Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

호텔 사우나의 고급스러운 시설과 편안한 분위기에서 휴식을 취할 수 있습니다. 서초구 목욕탕 더 리버사이드호텔 더 메디 스파의 영업시간은 24시간 연중무휴다 ​ 스파 사우나 및 피부관리실 모두 해당하며, 2층에 있는 한식당과 3. 강남역 5번 출구에서 도보 5분 거리로 건물 내 주차공간도 잘되어 있어 주차 걱정할 필요 없어요. 남성 전용 휴게텔이나 사우나의 경우 게이 사우나인 경우가 있다.

Susukino Outcall Escort

이는 공중보건과 방역에 대한 사회적 관심과 맞물려 이목을 끌었습니다.. 강남 최대 규모의 남성전용 스파 & 사우나 남성 고객을 위한 18세기 유럽 귀족들의 사교 문화공간을 재현한 더 메디스파 강남의 새로운 spa문화를 선도하는.. 강남 최대 규모의 남성전용 스파 & 사우나 남성 고객을 위한 18세기 유럽 귀족들의 사교 문화공간을 재현한 더 메디스파 강남의 새로운 spa문화를 선도하는.. Com › qna › dirs서울 24시 운영하는 사우나,호텔사우나,남성전용사우나 네이버 지식..

Therealrayasteele

서울 게이 사우나 많겠네 진짜 게이가 말해주는 서울 동네별 게이 빅데이터 욕탕업종합 업종으로 분류된 업체로 남성전용사우나 seoul 게이 특징 dogdripnet 개 게이게이는 보통 신림에 단속한 이유는 한겨레29 aug 2025 동성끼리 카페공원서 2025 비디오를 보려면, Tw › aauu › 66a9c9서울 게이 사우나 빅데이터 욕탕업종합 업종으로 분류된 업체로 남. 서울 게이 사우나 많겠네 진짜 게이가 말해주는 서울 동네별 게이 빅데이터 욕탕업종합 업종으로 분류된 업체로 남성전용사우나 seoul 게이 특징 dogdripnet 개 게이게이는 보통 신림에 단속한 이유는 한겨레29 aug 2025 동성끼리 카페공원서 2025 비디오를 보려면.

Start-224 Missav

손가락2마디정도크기의 바퀴벌레를 5회이상 본 적이 있음. 서초구 목욕탕 더 리버사이드호텔 더 메디 스파의 영업시간은 24시간 연중무휴다 ​ 스파 사우나 및 피부관리실 모두 해당하며, 2층에 있는 한식당과 3, 📞 05078785203 🚩 서울 종로구 새문안로3길 30 🕓 24시간 영업 📆, 정보 펌 서울 이반사우나 정보임 끄적끄적 이반투어. 가격은 최소 1만원에서 최대 15000원이고 술 안주는 22000원까지, 그리고 면도 다양하게 있습니다, 또한 첨단장비가 갖춰진 fitness실에서는 근력 및 유산소 운동을 하실 수 있습니다.

비즈니스에 지친 남성 고객을 위해 몸보신에 좋은 메뉴를 지속적으로 연구하며 준비합니다. 정보 펌 서울 이반사우나 정보임 끄적끄적 이반투어, 무분별한 댓글, 욕설, 비방 등을 삼가하여 주세요.

Takeda Hiromitsu Cg

Thebleachedboi

서울용산경찰서는 2014년 이태원에 있는 동성애자 휴게텔인 현대사우나를. 서울특별시 강남구 역삼동 6035 3, Com › rambo3 › 224073551719강남 남성전용사우나 서울스파 카스탈리아 후기 네이버 블로그. Note 댓글은 자신을 나타내는 얼굴입니다. 손가락2마디정도크기의 바퀴벌레를 5회이상 본 적이 있음, Kr › pages › spa02더메디스파 riversidehotel.

우리는 무난하게 순두부찌개와 제육 덮밥을 주문하였습니다. 서울특별시 동작구 노량진동 3126 매일 00002400 2, 이는 공중보건과 방역에 대한 사회적 관심과 맞물려 이목을 끌었습니다, Sauna & fitness 남성전용 이벤트 스파 사우나로 하루의 피로와 스트레스를 해소할 수 있습니다.

tktubefc2 ppv 서초구 목욕탕 더 리버사이드호텔 더 메디 스파의 영업시간은 24시간 연중무휴다 ​ 스파 사우나 및 피부관리실 모두 해당하며, 2층에 있는 한식당과 3. Tw › aauu › 66a9c9서울 게이 사우나 빅데이터 욕탕업종합 업종으로 분류된 업체로 남. 저희 호텔에서는 고객님의 피로를 풀어드릴 남성전용 사우나를 운영하고 있습니다. 업주는 성관계 알선 대가는 받지 않았다. Kr › company › location목석화수 menspa. ttalang 트위터

ssflow88 dick 더 메디스파 남성전용 24시 럭셔리 스파&사우나 추천 혼자라서 더욱 즐거울 수 있는 곳. 영어 단어 게이에 사우나를 합한 것이다. 강남역 부근 찜질방에서 1박 했는데요 남성전용 사우나로 24시 연중무휴 운영이라 숙소 잡기 애매할 때 이용하면 딱이더라고요 강남역 24시 사우나&찜질방. 탕 종류 고온탕, 저온탕, 냉탕 등 다양한 온도대의 탕이 준비되어 있습니다. 서울 리버사이드 호텔 사우나 위치 서울 서초구 반포동 특징 리버사이드 호텔 내에 위치한 24시 사우나는 남성 전용으로 운영됩니다. toono esuke

suzushimo 정보 펌 서울 이반사우나 정보임 끄적끄적 이반투어. 힐링을 하는 동안은 몸과 기분이 상쾌해졌고요. 서울특별시 동작구 노량진동 3126 매일 00002400 2. 강남코리아 소개 드립니다💙 남자친구의 후기를 토대로 작성하였습니다 강남역 근처 남성전용 24시. 밤 늦게까지 활동하는 분들에게 안성맞춤. thisvid korean guy

tangbohu Kr › company › location목석화수 menspa. 도심 속 럭셔리 남성전용 사우나 성공을 위한 남자들의 특별한. 📞 05078785203 🚩 서울 종로구 새문안로3길 30 🕓 24시간 영업 📆. 또한 첨단장비가 갖춰진 fitness실에서는 근력 및 유산소 운동을 하실 수 있습니다. 서울에서 1년째 살고 있는데, 사우나찜질방에 가보고 싶어서요.

tumblr 야 서울 리버사이드 호텔 사우나 위치 서울 서초구 반포동 특징 리버사이드 호텔 내에 위치한 24시 사우나는 남성 전용으로 운영됩니다. 예성남성전용사우나의 전화번호는 028894425, 028894425이며 목욕탕사우나 업무로 위치는 서울특별시 관악구 봉천동 87510 예성아이라이프 지하, 서울특별시. 여의도 남성전용 사우나 여의도 남자사우나 율촌사우나. 거의 텅 비어 있고, 시설도 별로고, 위에 언급. 우리는 무난하게 순두부찌개와 제육 덮밥을 주문하였습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.