사진 속 정다연은 아줌마라고 하기에 믿기 힘든 몸매를 뽐내고 있으며, 유연하게 스트레칭 하고 있다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정다연 님부터 양정원 님까지 운동녀몸짱녀 열풍. Official @barrel_spirit @sportsix. 정다연 님부터 양정원 님까지 운동녀몸짱녀 열풍. 감성 감성글귀 감동 명언 동기부여 성공 성공일기 piano music and bgm that.

감성 감성글귀 감동 명언 동기부여 성공 성공일기 piano music and bgm that.. 1165 ถูกใจ,วิดีโอ tiktok จาก กัน ที่แปลว่าปืนนน🔫 @users2547 วัยรุ่นจักราช🥰 พี่น้องโห่เกรียวbyเลวไม่ละ🅰️ รถตัด253🎋suara asli bongobarbar.. Enjoying my life nezzara.. Com › @ayuputrillnv_ › videoayuputri on tiktok..

314 Followers, 293 Following, 275 Posts 정다연 @dayeon_pilates On Instagram 대구 수성구 필라테스.

Com › dayeon_pilates정다연 @dayeon_pilates instagram photos and videos, 20190802 031936 이전글 다음글. 929 followers, 936 following, 148 posts 정다연&정토리 @tory_9217 on instagram 👩92년생 🐶17년생 말티푸 maltipoo.

93k followers, 972 following, 1,401 posts 정다연 민트우유 @dayoun08 on instagram 네이버 뷰스타 & 인플루언서 & 클립크리에이터 틱톡 로컬 인플루언서 & 포토 크리에이터 @genesisbbqgroup bambassador 📧 문의메일 dayoun08@naver.. 14k followers, 401 following, 60 posts 정다연_jung dayeon @da_yeoon_2 on instagram 🇰🇷team korea_diving🇰🇷 @getbarrel..

섹시화보집을 출간하며 인기몰이에 나서고 있는 인기 피트니스. 정다연의 남편 양승범씨는 이혼설을 묻는 mc에게 한번의 이혼 경력이 있는 부부다고 털어놨다. 정다연은 최근 브랜드메이커 임팩트크루가 제작 진행. 피트니스 강사 기구필라테스 11 21 매트필라테스 소그룹. 탄탄하고 멋진 몸매를 가진 그녀지만, 처음부터 그녀의 몸매가 탄탄했던 것은 아니었어요.

Com › @emilyyymccullar › videotiktok. 섹시화보집을 출간하며 인기몰이에 나서고 있는 인기 피트니스, 내 곁에 소중한 사람들과 다양한 경험을 통해 성장할 수. 그 결과, 12kg을 감량하고 멋진 몸매를 완성했어요.

내 곁에 소중한 사람들과 다양한 경험을 통해 성장할 수 있었던 2025년 ✨ 2026년도 사랑하는 사람들과 좋은 일만 가득하고read more. 몸짱 아줌마 정다연, 필라테스로 단련한 최고의 몸매. Com › @kayyyyybello › videokayla daniela @kayyyyybello’s videos with sonido original. 배우자 양승범 1961년 생, 1994년 결혼 아들 양주혁 1996년 생 딸 양은서 1997년 생. Tiktok video from arinda @arinda2887 capcut svargaresortlombok.

필라테스 정다연 Mlbpark와 탈아시아급심지어 얼굴도 이쁘심f컵 필라테스 강사 정다연 부문 톱10에 이름을 올렸다 현재 필라테스 센터 Silbecomview11181379428.

Com › @ayuputrillnv_ › videoayuputri on tiktok, 07 sbs 초고도비만 탈출기 2006. 피트니스 강사 기구필라테스 11 21 매트필라테스 소그룹.

방송 편집 좋은아침 고정게스트 1996, 현재 필라테스 강사로 일하고 있는 정다연 씨, 머슬마니아에서 정다연 씨를 기억하는 사람이 많다, 정다연의 남편 양승범씨는 이혼설을 묻는 mc에게 한번의 이혼 경력이 있는 부부다고 털어놨다, 734 followers, 6,153 following, 84 posts 제이블랑 필라테스 @jblanc_pilates on instagram everyday is a goodday to do pilates🧘🏻‍♀️ 11 private 21 duet 51 group 상담예약 010, les nounous saison 2 cest djinzin dès le 28 janvier 2026 à 15h00 sur a+ivoire nounou @herv.

남심저격 75f컵 402641의 초글래머 정다연, 머슬마니아에 출전한 필라테스 Ceo의 위엄.

14k followers, 401 following, 60 posts 정다연_jung dayeon @da_yeoon_2 on instagram 🇰🇷team korea_diving🇰🇷 @getbarrel. 필라테스 정다연 mlbpark와 탈아시아급심지어 얼굴도 이쁘심f컵 필라테스 강사 정다연 부문 톱10에 이름을 올렸다 현재 필라테스 센터 silbecomview11181379428, 개그맨 윤정수53가 12살 연하의 필라테스 강사와 혼인신고를 마치고 부부가 됐다. 75 f컵 피트니스 모델 겸 제이블랑 필라테스 센터 ceo 정다연 인스타그램입니다.

734 followers, 6,153 following, 84 posts 제이블랑 필라테스 @jblanc_pilates on instagram everyday is a goodday to do pilates🧘🏻‍♀️ 11 private 21 duet 51 group 상담예약 010. 28 활동지수 마력 12,560 작성글 게시글 203 댓글 894 쪽지 작성글보기 신고, ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 29 메이플 우리 길마 결혼했다 84 와우 이해가 잘 안 되시나본데, 위크오라는 핵이라고요ㅡㅡ 41 메이플 맑음 정보영상 안보는 이유, Original sound tr1n0x.

호시 못생김 디시 포토 f컵 글래머 정다연, 숨막히는 섹시미. Tiktok video from arinda @arinda2887 capcut svargaresortlombok. 734 followers, 6,153 following, 84 posts 제이블랑 필라테스 @jblanc_pilates on instagram everyday is a goodday to do pilates🧘🏻‍♀️ 11 private 21 duet 51 group 상담예약 010. 윤정수는 지난 18일 유튜브 채널 여의도 육퇴클럽을 통해 예비 신부와 혼인신고 하는 모습을 공개했다. 출처 정다연 사진제공 photo by 아트핏 우. 한남피플 후기 디시

헤그레 야동 75f컵을 자랑하는 피트니스 모델인 정다연은 사진 속에서 화이트 비키니를 입고 넘치는 볼륨감을 자랑했다. 내 곁에 소중한 사람들과 다양한 경험을 통해 성장할 수 있었던 2025년 ✨ 2026년도 사랑하는 사람들과 좋은 일만 가득하고read more. 09 sbs 스타 스페셜 다큐 몸짱 아줌마 정다연 2006. 93k followers, 972 following, 1,401 posts 정다연 민트우유 @dayoun08 on instagram 네이버 뷰스타 & 인플루언서 & 클립크리에이터 틱톡 로컬 인플루언서 & 포토 크리에이터 @genesisbbqgroup bambassador 📧 문의메일 dayoun08@naver. 윤정수의 결혼 소식을 접한 조혜련은 이동하는 차 안에서 여자친구에 대해 자세히 물어봤고, 윤정수는 12살 띠동갑 동생으로 현재는 필라테스. 협동 타워 디펜스 마신 티어

한나팔머 19 금 1435 글쓴이 가리개 가입일 2010. 정다연 님부터 양정원 님까지 운동녀몸짱녀 열풍. 사진 속 정다연은 아줌마라고 하기에 믿기 힘든 몸매를 뽐내고 있으며. Tiktok video from arinda @arinda2887 capcut svargaresortlombok. 필라테스 정다연 mlbpark와 탈아시아급심지어 얼굴도 이쁘심f컵 필라테스 강사 정다연 부문 톱10에 이름을 올렸다 현재 필라테스 센터 silbecomview11181379428. 헨타이계열

홍대 레제 팬티 19 금 1435 글쓴이 가리개 가입일 2010. 연예인 사진 123개의 글 목록열기 연예인 사진. 개그맨 윤정수53가 12살 연하의 필라테스 강사와 혼인신고를 마치고 부부가 됐다. 배우자 양승범 1961년 생, 1994년 결혼 아들 양주혁 1996년 생 딸 양은서 1997년 생. Com › @emilyyymccullar › videotiktok.

한국야동 홈캠 섹시화보집 브랜드메이커 임팩트크루에서 제작 진행하는 ‘임팩트화보집 정다연’을 발행한바도 있고 맥심모델 안정미, 화성인바이러스 v걸 한규리, 레이싱모델 이소영이 참여했다는데 어떻게 화보집이 나올지. 박민정 송형주 결혼 발표 박민정 송형주 결혼 발표 2. 올 하반기 머슬마니아를 준비 중인 정다연을 만나보았다. 내 곁에 소중한 사람들과 다양한 경험을 통해 성장할 수 있었던 2025년 ✨ 2026년도 사랑하는 사람들과 좋은 일만 가득하고read more. 섹시화보집을 출간하며 인기몰이에 나서고 있는 인기 피트니스.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.