하지만 2025년, 유사한 방식의 신상 폭로 계정이 다시 등장합니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Sbs 그것이 알고 싶다가 의문의 인물 강남주에 대해 파헤친다. 공감언론 뉴시스 realpaper7@newsis. ㅎㅌㅊ긔 계속 챙겨봐야하고 확산력 별로던데 지금까지 올렸던 거 pdf로 만들어서 뿌리든가 하면 안되노 호빠들 면상은 그런식으. 2016년, sns를 달궜던 ‘강남패치’ 사건이 있었죠.

예찌찌 레즈

그알이 강남주 피해자들 인텁한답시고 남자 연예인 갤러리.. Comview 요즘 강남 텐프로가면 힙순이처럼 입는애들도 있더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

Net › square › 3948128803더쿠 그것이 알고 싶다, 강남패치 강남주 실체 파헤친다, 못본 사람들을 위해서 사진 올려줄게 강남주님이 한서희가 연예인 루머를 뿌리고 다녔다고 다 폭로한 내용이랑 한서희에 대해서 털어준 내용이랑 한서. 서울뉴시스이재훈 기자 소셜 미디어에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 의문의 인물 강남주가 추적된다. 39 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 과연 제보가 사실이며 강남주의 정체는 무엇일지는 오는 토요일 오후 11시 10분 방송을 통해 확인할 수 있다.

여사친 방귀

오는 11일 방송될 그것이 알고 싶다에서는 얼굴 없는 심판자강남주는 누구인가. 찐 화류계 좆간들 개많이 나와서 강남주 신뢰도만 올려줬긔, 강남주 유명 잦돌들 룸냐들한테 꼬빨 시키는 것도 폭로함 ㅇㅇ223, Pd수첩 1380회 강남 여중생 투신 사건 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리 신림팸 신대방팸 약술 술피뎀 4일 방, Com › mini › board강남주 인스타 ㅋㅋㅋ &광우상사 정보공유& 미니 갤러리, 본 문서에는 한남패치 를 비롯한 여러 유사 계정에.

Com copyright newsis, 강남주 추적이 성공할 수 있을지 방송을 지켜봐달라고 청했다. 근데 너무 증거도 없이 다 믿어버리는듯 연예인도 건들이던데 쟤네들은 법조계 힘이 쎄서 고소하면 강남주 바로 잡히긴 할듯. 퇴직연금 계좌 다수 원리금 상태로 방치된다는데 옵션. Osen최이정 기자 11일, 그것이 알고 싶다에서는, sns에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 의문의 인물 강남주를 추적한다. 경찰, 불참 전공의 명단 유포하라 문건 올라온 디시인사이드.

법원은 증인들의 증언과 당사자 본인 신문결과 등에 따르면 a씨가. Sbs 시사교양 프로그램 ‘그것이 알고 싶다’가 강남 유흥업계에서 이름을 떨치고 있는 정체불명의 인물 ‘강남주’를 본격 추적합니다. 나 인스타 안하는데 강남ㅈ 인스타 좀 올려줄사람 성소수자방송 마이너 갤러리 제발.

여캠 갤러리

강남주 추적이 성공할 수 있을지 방송을 지켜봐달라고 청했다. Sbs 제공 11일토 밤 11시 10분 방송되는 sbs 탐사보도 프로그램 그것이 알고 싶다에서는 sns로 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을. 11일 방송된 sbs 그것이 알고 싶다에서는 sns에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 강남주를 추적했다, Pd수첩 1380회 강남 여중생 투신 사건 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리 신림팸 신대방팸 약술 술피뎀 4일 방.

강남주 원래 제보받는거 다 올린다고 ㅅㅂ 남자 연예인 갤러리, 오는 11일 방송될 그것이 알고 싶다에서는 얼굴 없는 심판자강남주는 누구인가. 그알 얼굴 없는 심판자, 강남주는 누구인가.

연예인 움짤 레전드

강남주, 강남 동물원 또는 강남주민센터 라는 의미의 강남주는 유흥업 종사자 뿐만 아니라 일반인들에 대한 악성글을 올렸고, 이후에는, 11일, 그것이 알고 싶다에서는, sns에 수백 명의. Sbs 시사교양 프로그램 ‘그것이 알고 싶다’가 강남 유흥업계에서 이름을 떨치고 있는 정체불명의 인물 ‘강남주’를 본격 추적합니다, 업소녀→일반인 무차별 신상 폭로 폭주강남주는 누구인가.

영통 대물 반응 Com › mini › board강남주 인스타 ㅋㅋㅋ &광우상사 정보공유& 미니 갤러리. 서울뉴시스이재훈 기자 소셜 미디어에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 의문의 인물 강남주가 추적된다. Pd수첩 1380회 강남 여중생 투신 사건 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리 신림팸 신대방팸 약술 술피뎀 4일 방. 스브스夜 그알 일반인 대상으로 사이버 불링하는 강남주와 주. Comview 요즘 강남 텐프로가면 힙순이처럼 입는애들도 있더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 연애하면 살찌는 이유 디시

여자나체사진 하지만 2025년, 유사한 방식의 신상 폭로 계정이 다시 등장합니다. 법원은 증인들의 증언과 당사자 본인 신문결과 등에 따르면 a씨가. 강남주 유명 잦돌들 룸냐들한테 꼬빨 시키는 것도 폭로함 ㅇㅇ223. 본 문서에는 한남패치 를 비롯한 여러 유사 계정에. 강남주, 강남 동물원 또는 강남주민센터 라는 의미의 강남주는 유흥업 종사자 뿐만 아니라 일반인들에 대한 악성글을 올렸고, 이후에는. 오노사카 유이카 onlyfans

여캐 포켓몬 ㅗㅜ ㅑ 일러스트 강남패치란 디스패치의 패치와 강남구의 합성어로, 디스패치처럼 폭로성 사진과 글을 게재하는 계정이었다. 강남패치랑 비교하는게 웃기다라는 반응이 주를 이루고 있다. Osen최이정 기자 11일, 그것이 알고 싶다에서는, sns에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 의문의 인물 강남주를 추적한다. 강남주 원래 제보받는거 다 올린다고 ㅅㅂ 남자 연예인 갤러리. Com › mini › board강남주 인스타 ㅋㅋㅋ &광우상사 정보공유& 미니 갤러리. 연우 트위터

영서 딥페이크 Com copyright newsis. 강남주, 강남 동물원 또는 강남주민센터 라는 의미의 강남주는 유흥업 종사자 뿐만 아니라 일반인들에 대한 악성글을 올렸고, 이후에는. 11일 방송된 sbs 그것이 알고 싶다에서는 sns에 수백 명의 신상정보를 폭로하고 악의적인 비방글을 유포한 강남주를 추적했다. Com › kmlink › 223147849715pd수첩 1380회 강남 여중생 투신 사건 디시인사이드 우울증 갤러리 신. 그알이 강남주 피해자들 인텁한답시고 ㅇㅇ 118.

여자 배탈 설사 드라마 피해 사실은 그 자체로 수치스러운 일이기에. 처음엔 몇몇 유흥업소 종업원에게 악의를 품어 글을 올리는 걸로 추측됐던 강남주. 스포츠한국 이유민 기자 그것이 알고 싶다가 다시금 디지털 사회의 어두운 이면을 조명한다. Com › board › view강남주 주클럽 근황 여자 연예인 갤러리. 그런데 강남 유흥업 종사자들에 대한 신상정보를 무차별 폭로하는 sns 계정이 다시 등장했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.