Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Character 치토チト, 유리ユーリ. Org › wiki › 우치다_마아야우치다 마아야 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Net › wiki › 미나세_이오리미나세 이오리 리브레 위키 librewiki. 유출 hnd021 사카노 유리 yuri sakano, 坂野由梨 여교사 진짜 질내사정 댓글 +10 조회 9.

대학생 Etf 디시

치토 미나세 이노리와 유리 쿠보 유리카가 부른 미발표.. 아카리 노노카츠바키 리카타키 유이나하루나 노아..

니아무라 아카리

Inori minase is a japanese actress, voice actress and singer who made her singing debut in december 2015 under king records label, Org › wiki › 타카하시_리에타카하시 리에 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 노래 유리색 금붕어와 꽃창포 瑠璃色金魚と花菖蒲 유닛 츠무기, 이오리 게임 아이돌마스터 스탈릿 시즌 해상도 3840 x 2160 내부 해상도. 유리가면 49 시력에 이상이 있는 히메카와 아유미는 폐허 상태인 시연장에 불안을 느낀다. 유리 선반에 있는 시계들을 좀 보다가, 예산 생각해서 기본 디비도 그레이랑, 1년 넘게 온라인으로 눈여겨봤던 사진 속 디비도 시보 우루시를 보여달라고, 유리 선반에 있는 시계들을 좀 보다가, 예산 생각해서 기본 디비도 그레이랑, 1년 넘게 온라인으로 눈여겨봤던 사진 속 디비도 시보 우루시를 보여달라고.

뒷배경이 화려한 만큼 아이돌 활동에서도 그걸 활용하면 편하겠지만, 미나세 이오리는 철저하게 자신의 힘만으로 인정받는다.. 미나세 이노리 2025 라이브 투어 개최 결정.. Com › menu › actoravdbs.. Ruriiro kingyo to hanashoubu iori minase..

달밤 대딸 야동

2주년을 통해 새롭게 시작하는 플레이어에게 재배포를 한 선례가 있지만, 앞으로 지속적으로 이벤트 복각과 유리 배포를 진행할지는 미지수다, 아마추어 때 유리나라는 이름으로 활동을 했었으며 당시에도 준수한 외모로 주목을 받았었다, 등산온천신사와 불각대자연 등 기호에 맞는 카테고리, 키워드로 방문하고 싶은 명소를 찾으십시오, 벌꿀에 첫사랑 4 세상에서 제일 좋아하는 소꿉친구 나츠키와 드디어 쌍방사랑이 된 코하루, 그라비아 아이돌 야시로 미나세 minase yashiro八代みなせ의, 너무 야한 수영 수영복의 거유 강사와 수영장에서 하렘 중출 레슨.

달맞이장의 아카리 Born decem2 is a japanese voice actress and singer affiliated with axl one. Org › person › 1325949水瀬いのり — the movie database tmdb. 쿠보 유리카 움직인다, 움직인다 소녀종말여행 少女終末旅行 girlslasttour 힐링애니 애니메이션 애니 애니노래. Ebod205 미나세 유카, 나루세 코코미, 카자마 유미 ebod246 아오야마 나나 fmes008 타치바나 나오 fmes037 아리무라 치카 hodv20666 아키야마 쇼코 ka001 타치바나 리코 ktsn003 니시나 모모카 love235 시이나 사라, 하쿠토 코코나 love348 스미카와 아유. 성우 미나세 이노리 씨와 쿠보 유리카 씨가 불러주신 소녀 종말 여행의 닫는 노래, 「more one night」입니다. 뉴진스 ㄸㄱ 디시

니나 쏭 후기 더쿠 중국에서 온 다이렉트 메일 미스터리 소녀 차밍 스페이스 애니메이션 양방향 수동 항공기 컵 미나세 유리 스타일, 브랜드：mizz zee, 남성 섹스 토이yami. 아카리는 슬랜더형 몸매에 미드는 조금 아쉽지만 전반적인 라인은 예쁜. 2011년 유루유리 휴나미 마리 2012년 중2병이라도 사랑이 하고 싶어. 아이마스 최초의 애니판인 아이돌 마스터 제노그라시아에서의 미나세 이오리제노그라시아는 원작의 이오리 이미지를 어느 정도 반영해서 그런지 솔직하지 못한 츤데레적. 그와 대조적으로 놀이로 생각하고 즐기려는 기타지마 마야. 다음중 화학물질 취급 안전수칙으로 옳지 않은 것은

놀쟈파라 아이마스 최초의 애니판인 아이돌 마스터 제노그라시아에서의 미나세 이오리제노그라시아는 원작의 이오리 이미지를 어느 정도 반영해서 그런지 솔직하지 못한 츤데레적. 유리 선반에 있는 시계들을 좀 보다가, 예산 생각해서 기본 디비도 그레이랑, 1년 넘게 온라인으로 눈여겨봤던 사진 속 디비도 시보 우루시를 보여달라고. 2 아이자와 유이치 의 어린 시절도 맡았다. 안쥬, 미사토와 함께 세인트포스 창설 멤버로서 현역일 때는 그린포스로 활동했다. 제주 추가 3,000원, 제주 외 도서지역 추가. 다음 중 금속부식성 물질의 특징으로 볼 수 없는 것은_

대물 통증 디시 Inori minase is a japanese actress, voice actress and singer who made her singing debut in december 2015 under king records label. 넓은 이마로 인해 마빡이4라는 별명을 갖고 있는 부잣집 아가씨. Ebod205 미나세 유카, 나루세 코코미, 카자마 유미 ebod246 아오야마 나나 fmes008 타치바나 나오 fmes037 아리무라 치카 hodv20666 아키야마 쇼코 ka001 타치바나 리코 ktsn003 니시나 모모카 love235 시이나 사라, 하쿠토 코코나 love348 스미카와 아유. Find information on japanese actor profiles and their works on avdbs. Inori minase is a japanese actress, voice actress and singer who made her singing debut in december 2015 under king records label.

니시노 에미 av Com › menu › actoravdbs. 넓은 이마로 인해 마빡이4라는 별명을 갖고 있는 부잣집 아가씨. Inori minase is a japanese actress, voice actress and singer who made her singing debut in december 2015 under king records label. 아이마스 최초의 애니판인 아이돌 마스터 제노그라시아에서의 미나세 이오리제노그라시아는 원작의 이오리 이미지를 어느 정도 반영해서 그런지 솔직하지 못한 츤데레적. Ruriiro kingyo to hanashoubu iori minase.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.