제작진 설명에 따르면 남극의 셰프는 mbc 시사교양 프로그램 지구의 눈물의 마지막 시리즈인 남극의 눈물 이후 mbc와 studio x+u가 의기투합해 13년 만에 다시 남극을 찾으며 시작된 기후환경 프로젝트다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Net › 670199949남극의 쉐프 1화 맛뵈기 나여 사명감 dogdrip. Mbc 남극의 셰프가 2025년 11월 17일월 밤 1050 첫 방송. Mbc는 백 대표가 출연하는 예능 기후환경 프로젝트 남극의 셰프를 17일 오후 10시 50분 첫 방송할. 요리연구가 겸 방송인이자 더본코리아의 대표인 백종원이 출연하는 ‘남극의 셰프’가 첫 방송된 가운데 다시 보기를 지원하지 않는 배경에.

각종 논란으로 방송 활동 중단을 선언했던 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 약 6개월 만에 다시 시청자 앞에 서게 됐다.

더 보기 2025년 1h 13m 백종원, 임수향, 수호 황순규, 김기민.

남극의 셰프는 오는 17일 처음 방송된다.

조회 수 276652 추천 수 481 댓글 363.. 전체 맥락을 이해하기 위해서는 본문 보기를 권장합니다..

백종원 더본코리아 대표가 출연한 mbc 교양 리얼리티 프로그램 가 지난 17일 첫 공개됐다, 어차피 일본 아마존 프라임에서 본방보다 더 빠르게 풀리고 다시보는것도 가능해서 뭐 韓国のmbcでは11月17日（月）よる10時50分スタートだが、日本. 원작 영화인 the chef of south polar, 南極料理人와 협의가 되었는지 불분명하다. Mbc는 백 대표가 출연하는 예능 기후환경 프로젝트 남극의 셰프를 17일 오후 10시 50분 첫 방송할. 포텐 공식 백종원 출연 남극의 셰프 측 다시보기 제공 안한다. 남극의셰프 다시보기 없다는 공지는 그냥 억까잖아.

는 그 이전인 지난해 말 촬영을 마친 프로그램이어서, 백 대표의 본격적인 방송컴백으로 보기는 어렵다.. Mbc 관계자는 이달 17일 일간스포츠에 mbc ‘남극의 셰프’는 프로그램 계약 문제로 다시 보기 서비스가 제공되지 않는다..

Mbc 예능 로 복귀하는 백종원이 복귀 전부터 다시 논란에 휩싸였다.

Mbc는 백 대표가 출연하는 예능 기후환경 프로젝트 남극의 셰프를 17일 오후 10시 50분 첫 방송할.

외식사업가 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 6개월 만에 방송에 복귀한다. 무료보기 라이브 + 다시보기 play 스탠다드 월 5,500원. Megj7q7auf 남극의 셰프 제작 studio x+u, mbc 측이 다시보기 서비스가 제공되지 않는다고 공지했다. Mbc는 백 대표가 출연하는 예능 기후환경 프로젝트 남극의 셰프를 17일 오후 10시 50분 첫 방송할. 더본코리아 관련 논란으로 구설에 올랐던 외식사업가 겸 방송인 백종원이 문화방송mbc 예능 프로그램 ‘남극의 셰프’로 방송에 복귀했다. 남극의 셰프로 복귀한 백종원, 활동 중단 선언한 유튜브 영상.

꽈은우 더 보기 2025년 1h 13m 백종원, 임수향, 수호 황순규, 김기민. 최근 공개된 mbc 교양프로그램 남극의 셰프는 백종원과 임수향, 수호, 채종협이 남극 세종과학기지를 찾아가 펭귄연구팀을 위해 도시락 배달에 나서는. 남극의 셰프는 백종원, 임수향, 수호, 채종협 이 사명감 하나로 남극 과학 기지를 지키고 있는 대원들에게 ‘따뜻한 한 끼’를 대접하는 과정을 담은 교양 리얼리티 프로그램이다. 온라인동영상서비스ott 웨이브에는 본방송. Mbc 남극의 셰프가 2025년 11월 17일 월 밤 1050 첫 방송. 나는솔로갤러리 이이경

김예은 풀팩 17일 방송된 mbc 남극의 셰프에서는 백종원이 배우 임수향, 그룹 엑소 수호, 배우 채종협과 남극 과학 기지를 지키고 있는 대원들에게 따뜻한 한 끼를 대접하기 위해 떠났다. Net › square › 3994970424더쿠 공식 백종원 출연 남극의 셰프 측 다시보기 제공 안한다. 혹한의 남극에 ‘따뜻한 한 끼’를 전하는 이색 리얼리티 ‘기후환경 프로젝트남극의 셰프’가 17일 공개된다. Mbc 남극의 셰프가 2025년 11월 17일 월 밤 1050 첫 방송. 외식사업가 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 6개월 만에 방송에 복귀한다. 김밍 은꼴

김유연 남친 디시 Net › 670199949남극의 쉐프 1화 맛뵈기 나여 사명감 dogdrip. 무료보기 라이브 + 다시보기 play 스탠다드 월 5,500원. 무료보기 라이브 + 다시보기 play 스탠다드 월 5,500원. 어차피 일본 아마존 프라임에서 본방보다 더 빠르게 풀리고 다시보는것도 가능해서 뭐 韓国のmbcでは11月17日（月）よる10時50分スタートだが、日本. 백종원, 임수향, 수호 exo, 채종협이 남극 세종과학기지 월동대원을 위해 제한된 식재료로 따뜻한 한 끼를 완성합니다. 나야와시 나무위키

김지연 라스 티팬 계획 수정으로 세금을 들여 남극의 현실을 파헤쳐 지구온난화에 대한 대중의 경각심을 일깨운다는 모토는 사실상 곁들이기 정도고, 현실은 백종원과 연예인들 홍보와 출연료 받는 방송으로 전락한 상황이다. 프로그램 콘셉트, 출연진, 촬영지, 재방송다시보기ott 시청 방법을 한눈에 안내합니다. Free 영상 200회 특집 마지막 이야기. ‘남극의 셰프’가 11월 17일 첫 방송을 확정했다. 남극의 셰프로 복귀한 백종원, 활동 중단 선언한 유튜브 영상.

나옹이빵 결혼 프로그램 콘셉트, 출연진, 촬영지, 재방송다시보기ott 시청 방법을 한눈에 안내합니다. 17일 방송된 mbc 남극의 셰프에서는 백종원이 배우 임수향, 그룹 엑소 수호, 배우 채종협과 남극 과학 기지를 지키고 있는 대원들에게 따뜻한 한 끼를 대접하기 위해 떠났다. 자동요약기사 제목과 주요 문장을 기반으로 자동요약한 결과입니다. ‘남극의 셰프’가 11월 17일 첫 방송을 확정했다. 11월 17일 오후 10시 50분 첫 방송되는 mbc, studio x+u 공동 제작 초대형 프로젝트 ‘기후환경 프로젝트남극의 셰프’이하 ‘남극의 셰프’는 백종원, 임수향, 수호, 채종협이 남극 과학.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.