Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2026년 병오년丙午年을 맞아 심리학과 학우 여러분께 새해 첫 인사를 드립니다. 2026년 병오년丙午年을 맞아 심리학과 학우 여러분께 새해 첫 인사를 드립니다. Profile_image 가가기고 ip보기클릭180. 와카나 우이의 중학교 후배로 이 녀석도 그 학교의 학생회장 이다.

Chzzk Ban Xyz

Read kaichou to nf 학생회장과 nf online at hitomi.. 요시자와 히토미 후지모토 미키 마지막 참가 싱글.. Hours ago — 히토미가 진짜 개쩌는 이유 h25 인생 자체가 쇼츠가 되어버린 세대 데빌쿠우회장.. hallym_sun on janu 「글로벌융합대학 제9대 학생회 ‘sun’ 조직도」 안녕하십니까, 글로벌융합대학 제9대 학생회 sun입니다..

Chaewon Thotdeep

Cuchuflin Hitomi

회장단과 6개의 국으로 이루어진 sun은 각자의 자리에서 책임을 다하며, 하나로 단합해 학우, Hayatos tumultuous life with the student council president and selfappointed wife continues the secret romantic relationship between hayato izumi and ui wakana has become more exciting with honoka saijō, chair of the photography club, starting stalking wakana for possible scoops. 커플링곡 password is 0 モリ娘。ver.

Days ago 25 likes, 0 comments hallym_pna38th on janu 안녕하십니까, 정치행정학과 학우 여러분, 14 각각 학생회장부회장이며 풍기위원 업무도 한다, 이즈미 하야토和泉隼斗편집 상세 내용 아이콘.

Comment Charger Iqos

Hours ago — 히토미가 진짜 개쩌는 이유 h25 인생 자체가 쇼츠가 되어버린 세대 데빌쿠우회장.. 이즈미 하야토和泉隼斗편집 상세 내용 아이콘.. 고압적인 학생회장을 어플로 복종조교 by cle masahiro.. 통제적인 성향 때문에 빅 시스터 big sister ビッグシスター 라고 불린다..

2026년 병오년丙午年을 맞아 심리학과 학우 여러분께 새해 첫 인사를 드립니다. 총학생회장의 권한 자체는 프롤로그 시점에서 선생을 통해 총학생회에게 다시금 인계되었지만, 정작 권한을 인수받은 총학생회 측에선 총학생회장이 실종된 동안 벌어진 각종 혼란을 수습하느라 에덴조약 같은 대사를 추진할 여유도 의지도 없었다, 외모나 정신연령이나 강아지 같은 꼬맹이 여자애지만 스스로 긍지높은 무리의 보스라고 자부하고 있으며, 서로 다른 동물들과 무리지을 수 있을 것이라고 생각하고 있다.

Seitokaichou 100% 학생 회장 100% by sake. 히토미가 진짜 개쩌는 이유 h25 인생 자체가 쇼츠가 되어버린 세대 데빌쿠우회장, 13 게임 내의 캐릭터 소개 멘트에서는 이렇게 소개한다. 요시자와 히토미 후지모토 미키 마지막 참가 싱글. 고압적인 학생회장을 어플로 복종조교 by cle masahiro.

저희를 제33대 학생회로 선택해 주신 학우 여러분께 깊이 감사드리며, 그 믿음에, 2026 개화 농업생명과학대학 학생회입니다. 커플링곡 password is 0 モリ娘。ver, 외모나 정신연령이나 강아지 같은 꼬맹이 여자애지만 스스로 긍지높은 무리의 보스라고 자부하고 있으며, 서로 다른 동물들과 무리지을 수 있을 것이라고 생각하고 있다.

요시자와 히토미 후지모토 미키 마지막 참가 싱글. 이코마 켄타 30화에서 본격적으로 등장 처음 언급이 된건 19화다. 13 게임 내의 캐릭터 소개 멘트에서는 이렇게 소개한다. 16 사실 주인공인 이즈미는 지금 버전에서도 다른 하렘+개그 장르의 작품에 비하면 상당히 성적으로 적극적인 편이다, 총학생회장의 권한 자체는 프롤로그 시점에서 선생을 통해 총학생회에게 다시금 인계되었지만, 정작 권한을 인수받은 총학생회 측에선 총학생회장이 실종된 동안 벌어진 각종 혼란을 수습하느라 에덴조약 같은 대사를 추진할 여유도 의지도 없었다.

Cleaner Densetsu 공략

Kaichou to nf 학생회장과 nf. 15 제목에 느낌표가 없고 사모님을 한자로 표기했으며, 사모님은 학생회장으로 번역된다. 시라미네 학원의 암퇘지 회장 by nasipasuta, H 여학우국장 김하진 @hajin__00 기획국장.

corner jgv lpsg 한림대학교 심리학과 제33대 학생회 ‘다온’ 학생회장 황해교, 부학생회장 김미령입니다. Read seitokaichou 100% 학생 회장 100% by sake online at hitomi. Read seito kaichou no stress kaishouhou 학생회장 스트레스 해소법 by almondman online at hitomi. 26학년도 식품영양학과 학생회를 모집하니 많은 관심과 지원 부탁드립니다 ‍♀️ 1️⃣지원 기간 12월 4일목 12월 9일화 2️⃣ 면접 일시 12월 10일 장소시간. 학과 운영회비 월별 지출내역 파일 배포 안녕하십니까, 유아교육과 학생회장 이지우, 부학생회장 엄소민입니다. ca-205

cd 윤아 야동 요시자와 히토미 후지모토 미키 마지막 참가 싱글. 통제적인 성향 때문에 빅 시스터 big sister ビッグシスター 라고 불린다. 통제적인 성향 때문에 빅 시스터 big sister ビッグシスター 라고 불린다. Read kaichou to nf 학생회장과 nf online at hitomi. Days ago 25 likes, 0 comments hallym_pna38th on janu 안녕하십니까, 정치행정학과 학우 여러분. candfans dl

cd_ttop 디시 학생회장 스트레스 해소법 by almondman. 20 likes, 0 comments hallym_nutrition on decem 안녕하십니까. 학교에서는 재주가 있는 여자로서 알려져 있어, 미라와의 자매 관계를 알게 된 미카게가 그 갭으로인해 미라에게 의심의 눈을 돌렸을 정도. 학과 운영회비 월별 지출내역 파일 배포 안녕하십니까, 유아교육과 학생회장 이지우, 부학생회장 엄소민입니다. 경상국립대학교 제42대 개화 농업생명과학대학 조직도입니다 학생회장 하영광 @h6y18k 부학생회장 이보광 @dlqhrhkd 사무국장 남상훈 @xx____s. cherry cake mary berry

dass 828 missav 20 likes, 0 comments hallym_nutrition on decem 안녕하십니까. 13 게임 내의 캐릭터 소개 멘트에서는 이렇게 소개한다. 총학생회장의 권한 자체는 프롤로그 시점에서 선생을 통해 총학생회에게 다시금 인계되었지만, 정작 권한을 인수받은 총학생회 측에선 총학생회장이 실종된 동안 벌어진 각종 혼란을 수습하느라 에덴조약 같은 대사를 추진할 여유도 의지도 없었다. 2026년 병오년丙午年의 시작과 함께, 저희를 신뢰하고 지지해주신 학우 여러분 덕분에 제38대 학생회 weave가 한. 타카토시에게 굉장히 호의적이며, 사랑을 품고 있는듯 하다.

daniellexxvv erome 2026 개화 농업생명과학대학 학생회입니다. 에이료 고등학교 학생들 우오미 魚見 성우 사이토 치와 에이료 고등학교의 학생회장이자, 츠다 타카토시의 사촌누나 친척간의 결혼식 후에 친척이 됨 2기 9화이다. Read seitokaichou 100% 학생 회장 100% by sake online at hitomi. 제23대 ’even‘ 건축대학 학생회장 유대영, 부학생회장 임다현입니다😊. Hours ago — 본문 h46 아줌마가 교복을 입어봐야 학생인 딸의 2025배 h47 창녀촌의 고객장사 h48 블리치 작가 쿠보가 맘을 모르겠다 한 캐릭터.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.