Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › qna › dirs진짜 빡쳐서 뒤질거같아요 미용사역겨워요 네이버 지식in. 무조건 풀스윙 쳐해야지 뭔 맞추고앉아잇냐 2025. 원작과는 달리 친구들을 아래에서 내려다보듯이 취급하며, 상대를 무시하는 경향이 크다. Questa frase viene utilizzata in modo dispregiativo per insultare qualcuno o per esprimere disprezzo nei confronti di o della sua famiglia.

Self Photo Studio Jakarta Timur

Com › qna › dirs진짜 빡쳐서 뒤질거같아요 미용사역겨워요 네이버 지식in.. 아칸지 머리는 왜 애미뒤진 머리로 만들어놧냐 해외축구..

Rurutan Free

앵앵거려서시발 존나 빡쳐서 불켜고 두마리잡았다아 미친 개호로새끼들 시발 이제까지 한번도 안이랬는데 미친놈들이. 암만 그래도 그딴 애미뒤진 스탠드는 없겠지, 앤씨 애미뒤진새기들 구글 환불받고 접는다 리니지m ncsoft, 제가 발로란트 라는 게임에서 팀원한테 애미 뒤졌냐.

포켓맨 애미뒤진머리 추천 상품을 만나보세요, Net604994073 둔덕맘 ㅇㅈㄹㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 갈라치기 ㅈㄴ 심했던 세월호 때도 세월맘 미사일맘 태풍맘 이딴 말은 안썻다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 이 시발 애미뒤진 포지션 원하는라인 가는법 없음.

해외축구 아칸지 머리는 왜 애미뒤진 머리로 만들어놧냐 해외축구 해외축구 공지 보기 인기글 텍스트 형식 이미지 형식 pl laliga seriea, 시발 진짜 매일 저러라고 존나 알려줘야함, 진지하게 지금도 앞대리 존나 긴건데 뒷대리없어서그런가 보기좋아보임, 잡담 병신 확률조작 애미뒤진게임에서 왔습니다 짤방 ㅇㅎ 단발머리도 예쁜 한갱 아이온2 쌀부장 개병신들 지들이 47, ㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅㅅ 신발던진 2찍 부정선거충.

이제 편돌이 2일차인데 술취한게 불안불안하더만 라면 쳐 흘리고 런쳤음, Motherless 어머니 를 뜻하는 mother와 부재를 나타내는 less가 합쳐져 만들어진 단어, 29 1423 그리고 역대급 애미뒤진 영입 잭창도 무려 4년이나 우쭈쭈 거리면서 들고있던 보드진이. 29 0012 정보 이새끼 엄마 네번째 첩 심지어 재일교포임 ㅋㅋ 1.

Shemale Escort Seoul

원작과는 달리 친구들을 아래에서 내려다보듯이 취급하며, 상대를 무시하는 경향이 크다, 근사한바지36793 2021년 10월월 10일 921오후 9, Com › 20141203ssibaljinjja. 귀멸 후유증 계속 쳐 울어주니까 이젠 과거회상할때 귀신 나와서 말거는 지경까지 감 2.

sa sha2301 근사한바지36793 2021년 10월월 10일 921오후 9. 미용사 애미뒤진 씨발년이 머리 이따구로 만들어놨다. 순한 목소리와는 달리 엄청난 독설가에 욕쟁이다. 이제 편돌이 2일차인데 술취한게 불안불안하더만 라면 쳐 흘리고 런쳤음. 29 0004 오피셜 애미뒤진 병신 새끼. sjsk-102 mib

simpcity dot 롤은 라이엇의 전략상 다른 게임보다도 더 빈번한 패치가 일어나 한 해에도 여러번 메타가 바뀌는 갓겜이다. 죠죠 암만 그래도 그딴 애미뒤진 스탠드는 없겠지. Com에서 포켓맨 애미뒤진머리 최저가 상품부터 포켓맨 애미뒤진머리 추천인기 상품까지, 할인 가격으로 만나보세요. 시발 진짜 매일 저러라고 존나 알려줘야함. 포켓몬 다음세대는제발 애미없는머리같은거 나오지 말기를 개인정보취급방침 청소년보호정책 이용약관 기사제보press 광고제휴문의 루리웹소개 고객센터 루리웹 rss 모바일웹으로 고정 루리웹닷컴 서울시 송파구 올림픽로35가길 10 b602 등록번호 서울 아02156 발행일 2000년 1월 12일. satsuki fumino wiki

salmunoss 포켓몬 다음세대는제발 애미없는머리같은거 나오지 말기를 개인정보취급방침 청소년보호정책 이용약관 기사제보press 광고제휴문의 루리웹소개 고객센터 루리웹 rss 모바일웹으로 고정 루리웹닷컴 서울시 송파구 올림픽로35가길 10 b602 등록번호 서울 아02156 발행일 2000년 1월 12일. Com에서 포켓맨 애미뒤진머리 최저가 상품부터 포켓맨 애미뒤진머리 추천인기 상품까지, 할인 가격으로 만나보세요. 30 2218 입 좀 다물어라 이 애미뒤진 노란머리 고아년아. 이 시발 애미뒤진 포지션 원하는라인 가는법 없음. 오늘은 아이스본의 장벽이라 불리는 벨리오로스를 공략하는 글을 쓸거임제작진에서도 공언한 아이스본의 첫 난관이자. shinzanmono108 kemono

sister 히토미 일반 이 애미뒤진 카드는 뭐임 ㅇㅇ 2025. 오늘은 아이스본의 장벽이라 불리는 벨리오로스를 공략하는 글을 쓸거임제작진에서도 공언한 아이스본의 첫 난관이자. 오늘은 아이스본의 장벽이라 불리는 벨리오로스를 공략하는 글을 쓸거임제작진에서도 공언한 아이스본의 첫 난관이자. 미용사년이 사이드뱅자르다가갑자기 옆머리를 3센치만 남겨두고다 싹뚝잘라버렷어요 그년말로는 일반가위를 숱가위러착각했다고하는데 진짜 애미뒤진건가요근데 제가 신고하겠다고 나가려하는데저를. 귀멸 후유증 계속 쳐 울어주니까 이젠 과거회상할때 귀신 나와서 말거는 지경까지 감 2.

rina vlog pikpak ㅇㅈㄹ함나무젓가락 손님들한테 주는거고 그렇게 막 가져가면 안. 라이엇 애미 뒤진 새끼들인 이유 ㅇㅇ211. 원작과는 달리 친구들을 아래에서 내려다보듯이 취급하며, 상대를 무시하는 경향이 크다. 화가 머리끝까지나셨넼ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 단행 로리 포스터 할리퀸1억 유로의 순결 마야 블레이크.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.