Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김병주 국회의원🇰🇷 @withkimbyungjoo highlights x. 경기도 국민안전체험관은 지하 1층에 복합 안전 체험장, 어린이 안전 동화마을, 응급처치 전문. 경기도소방재난본부 @ugo1tyakybbk0pj posts 변화의 중심, 기회의 경기 안전한 경기도를 위해 든든한 119가 되도록 최선을 다하겠습니다. My 휴대폰 본인인증 후 대여예약 확인 및 취소, 연장이 가능합니다.

My 휴대폰 본인인증 후 대여예약 확인 및 취소, 연장이 가능합니다.. 김동연 경기도지사는 소방공무원의 초과근무는 도민의 생명과 안전을 지켜온 헌..

비주얼 커플 2v [얼공작]

사네기유ts

사정관리 썰

두 기관은 확률형아이템 게임이용자 피해 구제의 실효성을 높이기 위해, 게임위 산하 확률형아이템 피해구제센터와 콘텐츠분쟁조정위원회의 기능을 유기적.. 김동연 경기도지사는 소방공무원의 초과근무는 도민의 생명과 안전을 지켜온 헌..

경기 화성소방서 남양119안전센터 박영규 소방사 37가 그 주인공이다, 대구에서 소방관으로 근무, 호남차별과 열악한 환경에서 근무해야 하는 소방관의 어려움을 이겨내시고 퇴직하시면서 대통령국민포장을 받음. ‘로드fc 스카우터’는 원주 mma 스포츠 페스티벌을 알리는 프로그램이며, 로드fc 글로벌 토너먼트 시드 선발을 위해 제작됐다. Hour ago — 주요 재난안전 관리상황 △ 충북 음성군 공장화재 대처상황 ※ 소방대응 1단계1519 → 2단계1525 발생개요1, 1190부 몸짱 소방관 달력을 보내드립니다.

비비화보 사과 보예지

용혜인 @yong_hyein posts x. Days ago 수원뉴스핌 박승봉 기자 김동연 경기도지사가 경기도 소방공무원들의 16년 숙원이었던 미지급 초과근무수당 341억 원을 전액 지급하기로 했다. 강추위가 계속되면서 도민 여러분의 건강이 걱정입니다, 이번 조치로 경기도 전현직 소방공무원 8,245명의 숙원이 마침내 풀리게 됐다.

Days ago 경기도가 2010년부터 16년간 이어진 소방공무원 미지급 초과근무수당 문제를 해결하기 위해 총 341억 원을 지급하기로 결정했다. 경기도 국민안전체험관 김진영기자 경기도민들은 주목, 10월 25일금 오후 2시 드디어 시작합니다. 대응 3단계라 소방관 형 트위터 위험할지도 몰라라고 말했다. 섶골나루와 천둥고개에서의 소중한 기억, 노수웅, Com › news › view김동연, 소방관 숙원 초과수당 341억 전격 지급소송 여부 무관.

블루미 ai 후기 Com › default › index_view_page경기도, 소방공무원 미지급 초과근무수당 지급결정 포천신문. Comyeotop_10달력서울시 소방관경기광주오피평촌오피평촌키스방몸짱달력 만들어화상환자 돕는다. 우리동네 소방관②박영규 소방사 사람들에게 웃음과 행복을 주기 위해 밤낮으로 열정을 쏟았던 개그맨이 사람들의 목숨을 구하는 소방관으로 옷을 갈아입었다. 강추위가 계속되면서 도민 여러분의 건강이 걱정입니다. 김동연 @dy_future posts x. 빵디 뜻

사야마 레이코 Kr › view경기도, 16년간 미지급 소방공무원 초과근무수당 341억 원 지급. 대응 3단계라 가서 위험할지도 몰라라고 말했다. Kr › view경기도, 16년간 미지급 소방공무원 초과근무수당 341억 원 지급. Days ago 경기도가 2010년부터 16년간 이어진 소방공무원 미지급 초과근무수당 문제를 해결하기 위해 총 341억 원을 지급하기로 결정했다. 가해자에 대한 구속영장도, 피해자보호명령도 청구되지 않았습니다. 브컨 짤

빙그레 희망 퇴직 디시 경기 화성소방서 남양119안전센터 박영규 소방사 37가 그 주인공이다. 김병주 국회의원🇰🇷 @withkimbyungjoo highlights x. 경기도소방재난본부 @ugo1tyakybbk0pj posts 변화의 중심, 기회의 경기 안전한 경기도를 위해 든든한 119가 되도록 최선을 다하겠습니다. 경기도 국민안전체험관 김진영기자 경기도민들은 주목. Ufc 제 19, 21대 헤비급 챔피언이자 uf. 사이카 야동

블러비 방송사고 이번 조치로 경기도 전현직 소방공무원 8,245명의 숙원이 마침내 풀리게 됐다. 김동연 @dy_future posts x. 김동연 경기도지사는 소방공무원의 초과근무는 도민의 생명과 안전을 지켜온 헌. Days ago 경기도가 2010년부터 16년간 이어진 소방공무원 미지급 초과근무수당 문제를 해결하기 위해 총 341억 원을 지급하기로 결정했다. ‘소방관 파이터’ 신동국 43, 로드fc 충주이 신예에게 다운당하며 큰 충격을 주었다.

브훔 논란 Fpn소방방재신문 1월 31일 오늘의 안전 상황. Ufc 제 19, 21대 헤비급 챔피언이자 uf. Com › default › index_view_page경기도, 소방공무원 미지급 초과근무수당 지급결정 포천신문. 연장 대여 후 사용연장이 필요한 경우 1회에 한해 가능합니다. 약 3시간 뒤에 메시지를 확인한 동생은.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.