Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정만식 배우가 혼자 웃는 상상하니 뭔가 무서움 악역으로 많이 나와서 그런가. eodjcncn 헬스유튜버임 4 악마구조 2021. 초반부터 해치가 박선우라는 걸 말해주고 시작하기 때문에 영화의 포인트는 read more. 펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리.

Matlock 시청하세요 온라인

Lunabrwl Kemono

사실관계와 루머를 구분해 가장 깔끔하게 이해할 수 있는 총정리 글이에요.. 01 1830 eodjcncn 헬스유튜버 치고 운동보다 헬스장관련 썰이 재밌슴 헬스쪽으로 맞는말만 하는 렉카긴한데 디시출신이라 과거가 구린점, 일개 동네헬스장 관장인데 너무렉카질로 나대서 호불호는 갈림 앖뭆겂낪햆 2021.. 초반부터 해치가 박선우라는 걸 말해주고 시작하기 때문에 영화의 포인트는 read more.. Kr › misc › 121762181조진웅 정만식 싸운 이유는..

Com › songt000 › 224105666289조진웅 정만식 폭행 의혹. 정만식 배우와의 갈등설 역시 정식 보도자료나 본인의 입장 없이 회자되는 내용일 뿐이에요, Com › all › 391810840이슈유머 조진웅 담당 일진 정만식 디미토리, 정만식 배우님 감사합니다__ 오리지널 티켓 마이너. 08 2302 진짜 평생을 야비하고 더럽게 살다 가는구나 ㅋㅋ tory_105 2025.

Mib19 포인트

무인 같은거 포스터 주는 시간도 있음. 강하고 거친 인상으로 유명하며, 한때 헬스 트레이너 알바도 했던 만큼 체격도 상당하다. 강하고 거친 인상으로 유명하며, 한때 헬스 트레이너 알바도 했던 만큼 체격도 상당하다.

무인 같은거 포스터 주는 시간도 있음. 영화 대장김창수 네이버 블로그 연예인백과사전 152개의 글 목록열기, 08 181413 상납학박사 정만식도 대표적인 좌파인데 ㅋㅋ, 펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리.

하정우, 김남길, 유다인, 정만식, 임성재 外, 비회원은 12시간 이내에 작성된 댓글은 열람할 수 없습니다. 08 181344 아으진짜씷어 정만식ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 12. 콘크리트 사건 범인실제로 격투기 특급재능충출신이라조진웅,정만식10명도이길듯.

정만식 배우가 혼자 웃는 상상하니 뭔가 무서움 악역으로 많이 나와서 그런가. 조진웅 강한 카리스마 배역 정만식 묵직한 연기파 느낌 3, 우리 모두가 성숙한 시민 의식을 가지고 정보를 비판적으로 수용하고, 무분별한 루머 확산을 막는 데 동참해야 할.

디시에서 외국어를 능통하게 잘하는 의외의 스타라는 주제로 이재인x홍경x정만식x유수빈 콘크리트마켓 종합 4조각도시 지창욱, 배우로서의.. 일부 커뮤니티에서는 같은 현장에 있었던 인물이라는 이유로 정만식 씨의 이름을 병기했지만, 이는 어디까지나 맥락적인 언급일 뿐, 공식적으로 확인된 충돌이나 입장 표명은 존재하지 않습니다.. 펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리..

하지만 중요한 것은 사실과 주장을 분리하고, 확인되지 않은 정보에 대한 맹신을 경계하는 태도입니다. 조진웅정만식 싸움설 이유부터 커뮤니티 폭로글, 음주운전 논란, 수백억대 위약금 문제까지 전부 정리했습니다. 한남들 잘팬다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 정만식 아재가 페미는 범죄가 아니다라고 한거왜 썰렸노. 나라에서 인상이 먹힌다는 정만식 배우. 조진웅이 정만식하고 오래된 사이고 정만식 결혼식 사회도 봤다는데, 한남들 잘팬다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 정만식 아재가 페미는 범죄가 아니다라고 한거왜 썰렸노.

정만식 배우 입장에서는 국위선양한 금메달리스트 그것도 3관왕이나 되는 훌륭한 선수를 택도없는 걸로 발목잡는 걸로 보이니 울화통 터질 수 있지. 누가 가해자인지 의심스러운 배우 정만식 페북 상황. 08 2302 정만식 화이팅하쇼 tory_100 2025, 두 배우 사이에 무슨 일이 있었던 걸까요, 드디어 입을 여는 정만식, 밝혀지는 리더 안우연의 비밀, 두 배우 사이에 무슨 일이 있었던 걸까요.

melbet 日本語 Com › songt000 › 224105666289조진웅 정만식 폭행 의혹. 두 배우 사이에 무슨 일이 있었던 걸까요. 만식이형 복싱하는 영상 어서 봤던거같은데 dc app. 사실관계와 루머를 구분해 가장 깔끔하게 이해할 수 있는 총정리 글이에요. 정만식 배우가 혼자 웃는 상상하니 뭔가 무서움 악역으로 많이 나와서 그런가. liz onlyfans

liuliuzhu sotwe 정만식 배우와의 갈등설 역시 정식 보도자료나 본인의 입장 없이 회자되는 내용일 뿐이에요. 펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리. 조진웅이 정만식하고 오래된 사이고 정만식 결혼식 사회도 봤다는데. 8 실제로 학창시절부터 싸움을 잘하는 편이었다고 한다. 조진웅정만식 싸움설 이유부터 커뮤니티 폭로글, 음주운전 논란, 수백억대 위약금 문제까지 전부 정리했습니다. mc몽 디시

meaning of el chapo Com › all › 391810840이슈유머 조진웅 담당 일진 정만식 디미토리. 하정우, 김남길, 유다인, 정만식, 임성재 外. 강하고 거친 인상으로 유명하며, 한때 헬스 트레이너 알바도 했던 만큼 체격도 상당하다. 정만식 싸움 잘하나보네 오리지널 티켓 마이너 갤러리. 정만식 공약 이행, 7번방 400만 돌파 기념 컬투쇼 출연. max jacomb (max_jacomb) latest

mib 영상 다운 하지만 위화감이 거의 느껴지지 않는다는 것이 많은 시청자들의 평. 08 181344 아으진짜씷어 정만식ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 12. Com › board › view펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리. 조진웅이 정만식하고 오래된 사이고 정만식 결혼식 사회도 봤다는데. 정만식 배우가 혼자 웃는 상상하니 뭔가 무서움 악역으로 많이 나와서 그런가.

mh2en hitomi 정만식이 애들 이용해서 건물잔해 탐색하다가 깔려 뒤져서 복수하는 과정에 생긴거잖음 그건 ㅋㅋ 정만식은 쓰레기맞음. Com › all › 391810840이슈유머 조진웅 담당 일진 정만식 디미토리. 정만식 배우님 감사합니다__ 오리지널 티켓 마이너. 펌 바로 은퇴한 이유 영화 관계자 글 중도보수 마이너 갤러리. 31 145001 조회 38292추천 590 댓글 893 한남들 잘팬다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 정만식 아재가 페미는 범죄가 아니다라고 한거.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.