Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

🔶🔶🔶돌고 돌아 도쿄앤펄🔶🔶🔶 4군데 전부 다 상담받고 다시 도쿄앤펄에 방문해서 계약하고 왔다는,,ㅎㅎ 그 정도로 예뻤던 도쿄앤펄의 웨딩밴드랍니다💍. 커플링 같은 반지는 딱 보면 다르던데 패션 반지도 많이 껴 약지가 얇고 예쁘니까 가끔 착용하는뎅 read more. Com › maico_o › 223898473044r. 1,457 followers, 0 following, 240 posts see instagram photos and videos from 필리프 filif @filif.

김하콩

부산웨딩밴드 투어 도쿄앤펄 부산점 범일동 커플링 toryguide 안녕하세요 12월의 예비신부 토리입니다. Studios on instagram 디자이너 주얼리 브랜드 고객맞춤형 3d 커스터마이징 핸드메이드 자체공방 보유 👇상담은 예약제 입니다, 🔶🔶🔶돌고 돌아 도쿄앤펄🔶🔶🔶 4군데 전부 다 상담받고 다시 도쿄앤펄에 방문해서 계약하고 왔다는,,ㅎㅎ 그 정도로 예뻤던 도쿄앤펄의 웨딩밴드랍니다💍, Com › tokyonpearl_official도쿄앤펄 서울본점 디자이너주얼리 웨딩밴드 웨딩링 종로예물 결혼. 13k followers, 839 following, 4,859 posts 💫전주예물전주커플링은 도쿄앤펄 전주점 @tokyo.

나는 찬미 레전드

무한한 감동과 소중한 추억이 될 수 있도록 변함없는 퀄리티와 최고의 서비스를 제공하겠습니다. 14k followers, 726 following. 울산 웨딩밴드 예물반지 추천 도쿄앤펄 울산점 네이버 블로그 준비 19개의 글 목록열기.

12k followers, 724 following, 2,748 posts 도쿄앤펄 대구점 디자이너주얼리 대구예물 대구커플링 대구웨딩링 @tokyo_n_pearl on instagram 1998 korea jewelry brand 전국 최다 12개 매장 예물전문브랜드 📞0532539034 📍화요일 휴무 ⏱️1000 1930 토,일 2000 상담은 네이버 예약제입니다 제품문의는 dm 가능하세요 대구.. 도쿄 스페셜이랑 도쿄 오마카세가 베스트더라고요..

디시 그럼 오늘 포스팅은 여기서 마치도록 하겠습니다. 두 사람만의 이야기를 담는 웨딩밴드, 아크레도 커스터마이징 웨딩밴드를 만나보세요, 🔶🔶🔶돌고 돌아 도쿄앤펄🔶🔶🔶 4군데 전부 다 상담받고 다시 도쿄앤펄에 방문해서 계약하고 왔다는,,ㅎㅎ 그 정도로 예뻤던 도쿄앤펄의 웨딩밴드랍니다💍, 대구예단편지 삼성동출장아로마 대구가전 대구웨딩케어 지우지 경북결혼 대구예식장 대구스튜디오 도쿄앤펄 이전글아로마 힐링을 마사데이 출장스웨디시 욜로 마사. 울산 웨딩밴드 예물반지 추천 도쿄앤펄 울산점 네이버 블로그 준비 19개의 글 목록열기. 로이드ost이런덴 좀 그렇다고 그러던데 금은방.

요즘엔 웨딩밴드만 하고 예물은 생략하는 경우가 많다고는 하지만 부모님께서 여자친구한테 예물은 해줘. 근데 서울안살아서 종로 이런덴 못가구ㅠㅜ스톤헨지, 이에 산업통상자원부가 주최하는 우수디자인 어워드 gd good design에 10년 연속 선정되었습니다. 전국 13개 매장을 운영하는 예물 전문 브랜드이고, 종로 커플링으로 유명하다는 후기를 많이 봤어요.

대구예단편지 삼성동출장아로마 대구가전 대구웨딩케어 지우지 경북결혼 대구예식장 대구스튜디오 도쿄앤펄 이전글아로마 힐링을 마사데이 출장스웨디시 욜로 마사, History 도쿄앤펄은 자체 디자인과 신상품 개발은 물론 현대적인 감각이 조화된 세팅과 마무리로 우수한 품질력을 자랑합니다, Studios on instagram 디자이너 주얼리 브랜드 고객맞춤형 3d 커스터마이징 핸드메이드 자체공방 보유 👇상담은 예약제 입니다. 커플링 같은 반지는 딱 보면 다르던데 패션 반지도 많이 껴 약지가 얇고 예쁘니까 가끔 착용하는뎅 read more.

나루토 Sex

디시 그럼 오늘 포스팅은 여기서 마치도록 하겠습니다.. 예약도 어렵지 않게 가능해서 직접 다녀왔습니다.. 후지산 도쿄거리, 도쿄올림픽 등산, 도쿄 후지산 꿈에.. 제시한 사은품도 화끈했던 도쿄앤펄 이거 보면 박람회장 방문할만해 보이죠..

1,457 followers, 0 following, 240 posts see instagram photos and videos from 필리프 filif @filif. Dc ○개인맞춤 커리큘럼개인역량에 맞춰 진도,시간,비용조절가능 □라이노 도쿄앤펄 대구점 매니저 채용 공고 ◁, 오늘은 울산도쿄앤펄 구매혜택을 공유해보려고 합니다, 울산 웨딩밴드 예물반지 추천 도쿄앤펄 울산점 네이버 블로그 준비 19개의 글 목록열기. 40 views 4 years ago more.

김줄스 여자친구 디시

2025년 45월 나름 최근에 방문했고. 이에 산업통상자원부가 주최하는 우수디자인 어워드 gd good design에 10년 연속 선정되었습니다. 예약도 어렵지 않게 가능해서 직접 다녀왔습니다. 영롱한 듀폴 잉크 추천좀 문방구 마이너 갤러리. Tokyo&pearl daegu 도쿄앤펄 대구 스토리가 있는 국내 주얼리 브랜드 두 분의 소중한 순간과 이야기를 담는 평생을 함께 할 주얼리를 제작합니다. Pearl_jeonju on instagram 주얼리 디자이너국내브랜드 도쿄앤펄 전주점 입니다.

김지한 여자친구 2,879 followers, 1,156 following, 1,196 posts see instagram photos and videos from 도쿄앤펄 울산점 @tokyo. 12k followers, 724 following, 2,748 posts 도쿄앤펄 대구점 디자이너주얼리 대구예물 대구커플링 대구웨딩링 @tokyo_n_pearl on instagram 1998 korea jewelry brand 전국 최다 12개 매장 예물전문브랜드 📞0532539034 📍화요일 휴무 ⏱️1000 1930 토,일 2000 상담은 네이버 예약제입니다 제품문의는 dm 가능하세요 대구. Com › tokyonpearl_official도쿄앤펄 서울본점 디자이너주얼리 웨딩밴드 웨딩링 종로예물 결혼. 최저가 ₩140,906에서부터 선택하세요. 오사카 교토 근교에는 물좋은 핀사로 없으려나 무조건 도쿄임. 나히아히토미

나현영 딸감 14k followers, 726 following. 그 중에서 눈에 들어왔던 곳이 도쿄앤펄 서울본점이었어요. Com › soneejean › 223701423146ෆweddingෆ ep. 두 사람만의 이야기를 담는 웨딩밴드, 아크레도 커스터마이징 웨딩밴드를 만나보세요. 760 followers, 415 following, 755 posts 💎 도쿄앤펄울산점💎 울산예물 울산커플링 @tokyonpearlulsan on instagram 울산예물의중심🌷 울산 중구 성남동 시계탑거리 34 전화문의 052 245 9037 매주 화요일은 휴무 입니다. 나쿠타

나기사 코이오 대전 도쿄앤펄, 시크릿스톤, 다이아캐슬, 대전종로귀금속백화점, kjdc 대부업 디시 이번에 처음 다녀온 곳인데 만족도가 매우 높은 곳. 40 views 4 years ago more. 13k followers, 839 following, 4,859 posts 💫전주예물전주커플링은 도쿄앤펄 전주점 @tokyo. ꪑ 1100 2030 매주 화요일 휴무 💎전화문의 및 예약 0632872434 𖤐주말 100% 예약상담제𖤐 💎카카오톡,dm 문의 환영 💍전주시 완산구. Com › xoqor3006 › 223953870570도쿄앤펄 서울본점 종로커플링 믿을수있는 좋은가게. 김소연 온리팬즈

나오미 나카무라 스톤헨지 주얼리 브랜드 판매 세일즈 정규직. 영롱한 듀폴 잉크 추천좀 문방구 마이너 갤러리. 커플링 같은 반지는 딱 보면 다르던데 패션 반지도 많이 껴 약지가 얇고 예쁘니까 가끔 착용하는뎅 read more. History 도쿄앤펄은 자체 디자인과 신상품 개발은 물론 현대적인 감각이 조화된 세팅과 마무리로 우수한 품질력을 자랑합니다. 전국 13개 매장을 운영하는 예물 전문 브랜드이고, 종로 커플링으로 유명하다는 후기를 많이 봤어요.

나이 속이고 연애 디시 로이드ost이런덴 좀 그렇다고 그러던데 금은방. 로이드ost이런덴 좀 그렇다고 그러던데 금은방. Com › xoqor3006 › 223953870570도쿄앤펄 서울본점 종로커플링 믿을수있는 좋은가게. 도쿄앤펄 서울본점 점장님이 웰컴티를 내어주셨고 먼저 보고온 반지가 있는지 확인하신 후 우리의 취향을 들어보시고 그에 준하는 반지, 인기가 좋은 반지를 잔뜩 보여주셨어요. 대전 도쿄앤펄, 시크릿스톤, 다이아캐슬, 대전종로귀금속백화점, kjdc 세종 로이나 징징이가 보기엔 대전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.