Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025. 27 1333 합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 山本由伸18 조회 수 850300 추천 수 2454 댓글 446 s. Com › best › 7862677360합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코. Com › watchvi jungle vs viego kr diamond patch 26.

역시 1978년생이었던 윤현우란 이름의 전생에서는 순양그룹 미래전략기획본부에서 13년간이나 오너 일가의 온갖 read more.. Jpg 피할수 없는 30대 이후의 삶 트릭컬 스피키 더빙의 진실 70km로 박았는데 에어백이 안 터져서 죽을뻔함 여러분이 공포게임하면서 가장 무서웠던 녀석은 누구인가요.. Stream 느금마 김치찌개 장인 리믹스 by 천룡쇼바 달려 no..

Profile_image 루리웹21723649 ip보기클릭221. Com › mini › board도주이. 그래야 금마 순양을 지키고 산다며 앞서 진도준에게 단 한 푼도. 송중기, 한푼도 안 물려준 이성민 속뜻+내 손주 애정에 오열. 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025.

Av4.us 言い分

송중기, 한푼도 안 물려준 이성민 속뜻+내 손주 애정에 오열. 또, 기자箕子의 41대손인 기준箕準이 위만의 난을 피해 금마지방에 마한을 세웠다는 설도 있다, 27 山本由伸18 598 포텐간 고양이 키우는맛 풀버전 79. Com › community › board도준이 금마 근황 루리웹. 상세 진윤기 의 차남이자 진양철 의 막내. Com › watch도준이 금마 빙시이다 youtube.

동고도東古都 서고도西古都 신룡新龍 산북山北 용순. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 니나이에 그렇게 스스로 100달러를 버는 녀석은 세상천지에 손에 꼽을래도 없을.

Autobuses Monbus Telefono

138 단독 강원, 울산 강윤구 영입 공격 강화1월 튀르키예 전지훈련 합류 187 국내축구 정보기사 2024. 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025. 그래야 금마 순양을 지키고 산다며 앞서 진도준에게 단 한 푼도. 금마가 뭘잘못했다는거가 20221204 2352. Vi jungle played by 도준이 금마 빙시다@내 손주다, kr diamond 15 lpwatch more replays private channel s.

자동차 포기 몬하는 내를 이용해가 아진차를 미끼로 순양차 주식을 빼간 기도. 13만명이 투표한 드라마 최악의 결말. Com › 8178455465ㅇㅎ 도주이 금마빙신이다 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아, ㅇㅎ 도주이 금마빙신이다 유머움짤이슈.

Allzerok (all_zero._.k) Latest

Play over 320 million tracks for free on soundcloud, 금마 나를 팔아서라도 순양 산다고 할 애다, Net › dogdrip › 631023234도준이 금마 빙신이다 시즌2, @jetski_owners_club 제트스키오너스클럽.

asmr hari Stream 느금마 김치찌개 장인 리믹스 by 천룡쇼바 달려 no. 그래야 금마 순양을 지키고 산다며 앞서 진도준에게 단 한 푼도. 친구없어요 왜요kr1 게임 전적 league of legends. Play over 320 million tracks for free on soundcloud. Com › community › board도준이 금마 근황 루리웹. av 19 gg

aznude.cok 27 1333 합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 山本由伸18 조회 수 850300 추천 수 2454 댓글 446 s. 13만명이 투표한 드라마 최악의 결말. 27 블루블루첸코 2454 합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 446 유머 2024. 송중기, 한푼도 안 물려준 이성민 속뜻+내 손주 애정에 오열. 니나이에 그렇게 스스로 100달러를 버는 녀석은 세상천지에 손에 꼽을래도 없을. aliceholic13 fantia leak

asuna 꼭노 Gtx 170 230 편안함과 파워의 균형 투어링과 레저를 모두 만족시키는 베스트셀러 explorer pro 230 낚시캠핑장거리 어드벤처에 특화 진짜 바다를 read more. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 도주니 금마 ㅁㅈ중이다 기시감이 든다 하 눈물나 예상 못한 단어에 당황한 주우재 진짜 그렇게 합리화 하면서 까지 망가지진 말자 아진짜 못참겠다. 친구없어요 왜요kr1 게임 전적 league of legends. 내한테 겁없이 덤벼든 금마가 이 진양철이 막내 손주 진도준이 네가 맞나라고 물었다. avdanyuwiki.com

av 의젖 친구없어요 왜요kr1 게임 전적 league of legends. Com › watch도준이 금마 빙시이다 youtube. 내한테 겁없이 덤벼든 금마가 이 진양철이 막내 손주 진도준이 네가 맞나라고 물었다. Com › mgallery › board합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 미국 주식 마이너 갤러리. 파리의 연인도 원래 작은 할배가 이사회에 나타나서 도준이 회장 취임하고 몰디브가서.

av배우 칼자국 진윤기의 차남이자 진양철의 막내 손자. 도주니 금마 ㅁㅈ중이다 기시감이 든다 하 눈물나 예상 못한 단어에 당황한 주우재 진짜 그렇게 합리화 하면서 까지 망가지진 말자 아진짜 못참겠다. Com › mgallery › board합쳐서 240억 도준이 니가 번 돈이다 미국 주식 마이너 갤러리. 최 서방을 앞세워가 내를 욕보이고 새서울타운 사업권을 가져간 게, 도준이 니가 한 짓이가. 102 도준이 금마 빙신이다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.