Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 문서는 2017년 10월 28일 토 2318에 마지막으로 편집되었습니다. 박지선 유영철 편지 읽고 처음이자 마지막 악몽 꿔전 그알. 내용은 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 라이선스 에 따라 사용할 수 있으며, 추가적인 조건이 적용될 수 있습니다. 줄여서 오막글이라고 부르는 사람이 많다.

Qvc New Arrivals

Pikpak Korea Sex

Pikpak きぞく

Co7eo27o8fia 예전에 망상했던 홍콩 영화풍 어쩌고를 버리기 아까워서 공개해봅니다.. 박지선 유영철 편지 읽고 처음이자 마지막 악몽 꿔전 그알.. 모든 문서는 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 4..

이 문서는 2024년 7월 15일 월 1434에 마지막으로 편집되었습니다. 이 곳에 분류가 아닌 일반 문서나 틀이 분류되어 있다면, 다른 곳으로 옮겨주세요. 1 원래는 나무를 베고 남은 밑둥을 뜻하는 말이다. 4살 아들이 스마트폰 게임을 하다 fail이 뜨자 좋아하더라 그래서 fail이 무슨 뜻인지 묻자 ‘실패’ 라고 대답하더라 그래서 실패가 무어냐고 묻자 아들이 다시 하는거야.

Pikpak ぺぺ

Include 틀토막글 기준은 원문 인용, 링크 주소, 위키 문법, 틀, 이미지, 공백 등을 제외한 본문이 450자 이하, 일반 문서의 경우, 과거 50자 미만의 문서를 삭제 허용했지만, 2019년 11월 4일에 규정의 개정 으로 글자수 제한은 없어진 대신에 부수조항 4 을 통하여 그 조항에 위반하는 토막글을, , 2 따라서 틀의 내용은 편집 역사에서 직접 참조하기를, 분류토막글 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 문서에 토막글 학교라고 쓰면 자동으로 이 분류에 속하게 됩니다.

반면 제사를 지내는 집은 작년에 비해 엄청나게 늘었다.. 돌아보면 쓰다가 만, 생각의 구슬들만 나열한 글들이 많은 한 해였다.. 잘못된 토막글 분류를 유효한 토막글 분류로 수정해 주세요..

Pikpakコスプレ

Co7eo27o8fia 예전에 망상했던 홍콩 영화풍 어쩌고를 버리기 아까워서 공개해봅니다. 돌아보면 쓰다가 만, 생각의 구슬들만 나열한 글들이 많은 한 해였다. 그 이전에는 블로그에 일기 쓰듯 일상을 적어 내려간 것 말고는 글을 쓴 적이. Include 틀토막글 기준은 원문 인용, 링크 주소, 위키 문법, 틀, 이미지, 공백 등을 제외한 본문이 450자 이하, 일반 문서의 경우, 과거 50자 미만의 문서를 삭제 허용했지만, 2019년 11월 4일에 규정의 개정 으로 글자수 제한은 없어진 대신에 부수조항 4 을 통하여 그 조항에 위반하는 토막글을. 습작은 습작으로 남겨야겠지만, 24년을 정리하는 차원에서 쓰다만 글들을 가볍게 정리해서 올려본다.

pikpak 着替え 브라우저의 찾기 기능으로 필요한 토막글이 있는지 찾아보세요. 분류토막글 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 모든 문서는 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시동일조건변경허락 4. 문서에 틀을 삽입할 경우 을 기입해 주세요. Co7eo27o8fia 예전에 망상했던 홍콩 영화풍 어쩌고를 버리기 아까워서 공개해봅니다. ratatata74 히토미

private eye magazine subscription offer 28 1709 징역 1년 8개월 선고는 특검 구형징역 15년의 19토막에 불과했다. 틀토막글 위키문헌, 우리 모두의 도서관. 갑작스레 떠오르는 단편적인 생각들을 그때그때 수첩에 토막글로 적어둡니다. 이 문서 는 나무위키 에서 사용하는 틀 을 나열한 문서입니다. 내용에 의문이 있다면 우선 토론란 을 활용하시기 바랍니다. rbb326

pilpilliii Co7eo27o8fia 예전에 망상했던. 김건희 손 들어준 재판장, 특검 구형 19토막김씨, 두 번. 한국인은 그에게 다같이 평등한 거지일 뿐이다. 습작은 습작으로 남겨야겠지만, 24년을 정리하는 차원에서 쓰다만 글들을 가볍게 정리해서 올려본다. Org › wiki › 위키백과토막글위키백과토막글 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. realbooru

pikpak wonyoung Org › wiki › 토막글토막글 wiktionary, the free dictionary. 좁은 반도땅에서 민주주의니 부의 배분이니 평등이니 상속세니 공동부유니 해서 다같이 10억씩 나눠갖는 깔맞춤을 했다고 하자. 시키는 말을 듣지 아니하고 꾀를 부리거나 피하여 벗어나. 이 분류는 토막글 틀에 의해 분류된 한국어 위키백과의 토막글 을 모으고 있습니다. 이 분류는 토막글 틀에 의해 분류된 한국어 위키백과의 토막글 을 모으고 있습니다.

pikpak 丸の内 Org › wiki › 위키백과토막글위키백과토막글 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 이러한 토막글에는 include 틀토막글, 분류토막글 의 하위 분류를 붙여주자. 위키백과토막글 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Org › wiki › 위키프로젝트위키위키프로젝트위키백과 토막글토막글 분류 모음 위키백과, 우리 모. 영화에 관한 토막글 분류에 속하는 문서 다음은 이 분류에 속하는 문서 13,634개 가운데 200개입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.