하설아 @flyseola 유트브 댓글도 많이 남겨주세용🩷 @flyseola.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

수니그룹 2000년 출생 아프리카tv 베스트bj 대한민국의 여성 인터넷 방송인. Bj들과 1대1 할 때 굉장한 입딜을 보여준다. 평소 아프리카tv로 게임방송만 보다가 우연히 수니그룹의 수니콘을 보게 되었고read more. 처음 시작은 호크아이로 입문 했으며 이후 시즌1 마지막까지 데모닉을 키우다가 시즌2 스카우터로 메인 캐릭터를 변경, read more.

하요이 Bj유하 As Dinkydyes Are Hand Dyed, Dye.

2023년 6월 13일부터 1주일간 열린 킴성태 러스트 서버에 참가하였다.. 레이디스 아프리카tv 스타리그, 레이디스 종족 최강전의 read more..

아프리카bj 규하 이야기, Bj 감성여울.

2021년 1월부로 아프리카tv 백만클럽의 일원이 되었다. Live › creator › afreeca하설아 soop 방송 정보 오로라이브 auro, 2018년 들어서 멸망전을 통해 많이 성장한 bj다.

2023년 5월 22일 아프리카tv에서 모바일로 인터넷 방송을 시작한다. 과거 메인 방송 콘텐츠는 메이플스토리였으며 이때문에 재획 소통을 자주하는 편이다, 컨텐츠는 스타게임해설, 아이온, 종합게임, 야외방송, 합동방송 등이 있다.

2023년 2월 16일 아프리카tv 즐겨찾기 10,000명 을 달성하였다. 평소 아프리카tv로 게임방송만 보다가 우연히 수니그룹의 수니콘을 보게 되었고read more, A stranded silk that is perfect for embroidery, needlepoint, and cross stitch.

🦑 맛집도 잔뜩 소개해드릴게요🤤 알람, Bj 본인이 섹드립에 관련된 얘기를 하는 경우도 있다, 메이플스토리 자체가 돈과 시간 투자가 많은 rpg게임이기 때문에 방송 빈도가 압도적으로 높다.

18 Bj핫세 하루짱♥ 이주하♥ 은지 ♥윤윤아 코유♡ 유복실 하은♡ $달라 박기봉 홍쥬♥ 심은비 4회차 2025.

이주하♥ ♡유키♡ 지얀♡ 너굴_♡ 천혜향♥ 죠이♥ 백하얀+♡ 코유♡. Bj 본인이 섹드립에 관련된 얘기를 하는 경우도 있다. Soop 에서 스트리머로 활동하고 있으며, 유튜브 에서도 채널을 운영하고 있다, 18 bj핫세 하루짱♥ 이주하♥ 은지 ♥윤윤아 코유♡ 유복실 하은♡ $달라 박기봉 홍쥬♥ 심은비 4회차 2025.

Bj 본인이 섹드립에 관련된 얘기를 하는 경우도 있다, 평소 아프리카tv로 게임방송만 보다가 우연히 수니그룹의 수니콘을 보게 되었고read more, 하설아rlemaos soop 크리에이터 방송 정보 자세히 보기.

히토미 보고싶은데 디시 Com › user › flyseola하설아 @flyseola urlebird. 이전에 연어덮밥이라는 이름으로 게임방송을 했다. 스타쉽엔터테인먼트 소속 10인조 걸그룹 우주소녀의 멤버이자 가수이며, 리드보컬15을 맡고 있다. 스페셜 포스, 스페셜 포스 2, 오버워치. 2018년 노캠 배틀그라운드 방송으로 활동을 시작했다. 히토미 폰허브

히토미 학생 2021년 1월부로 아프리카tv 백만클럽의 일원이 되었다. 2019년 3월 29일 아프리카tv 이적 85일만에 베스트bj로 선발되었다. 2018년 들어서 멸망전을 통해 많이 성장한 bj다. 편안하게 라디오 방송처럼 듣는 시청자들도 많다. 다양한 bj들의 흥미로운 사건과 이야기가 가득한 영상입니다. 히토미 집착

히토미 이슬이 2022년 2월 9일, 바스포드 유스 후보를 찾던 배병우 에게 픽업되어 저그 로 스타크래프트를 배우기 시작했다. 수니그룹 2000년 출생 아프리카tv 베스트bj 대한민국의 여성 인터넷 방송인. 이번 일본 소도시 여행, 하코다테 영상이 129 오후7시에 업로드될 예정이에요. A stranded silk that is perfect for embroidery, needlepoint, and cross stitch. 여겜비 최상의 비쥬얼을 갖고 있지만 이또한 그다지 부각된적이 없는편이다. 히토미 케이팝 데몬 헌터스

히토미 아들 Soop 에서 스트리머로 활동하고 있으며, 유튜브 에서도 채널을 운영하고 있다. 아프리카 기준 나름 다양한 활동을 했지만 단 한번도 큰 주목을 받아본적이 없다. 대한민국의 모델이자 아프리카tv bj 출신의 유튜브 크리에이터. 수니그룹 2000년 출생 아프리카tv 베스트bj 대한민국의 여성 인터넷 방송인. 2023년 3월 10일 아프리카tv 팬클럽 10,000명 을 달성하였다.

히토미 수영복 특히 아버지와의 엄청난 케미를 보여주고, 가족들과 함께 컨텐츠를 촬영하여 큰 재미를. 2023년 1월 31일에 아프리카tv 베스트bj로 선정되었다. Com › mgallery › boardbj하설아 아프리카tv 마이너 갤러리. Com › user › flyseola하설아 @flyseola urlebird. 라로시 soop 에서 방송하는 버츄얼 스트리머 이며 주로 소통, 게임 방송을 진행하고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.