Com › view엔씨 신더시티, 멋진 겉모습 뒤 부실한 슈팅게임 기본기.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

신더시티는 화려한 그래픽과 전투 기술도 훌륭했지만 주인공의 과거와 현재를 잇는 감정을 오픈월드 속에서 추적해가는 게 특히 흥미로웠다. Com › kki2427 › 223584687989네이버 블로그. 엔씨소프트 의 자회사인 빅파이어게임즈에서 개발 중인 3인칭 오픈월드 mmo 슈팅 게임. 6점분위기, 타격감, 전투 삼박자 모두 만족엔씨소프트.

엔씨 신더시티 해보니엔비디아 협업 기술력 돋보여.

신더시티는 엔씨소프트가 프로젝트 혼 이후 10년 만에 트라우마를 극복하고 내는 슈팅게임이다.. Kr › news › articleview리뷰 전장이 된 서울엔씨의 차세대 택티컬 슈터 신더시티 . 강남판교가 게임에엔씨소프트 신더시티, 글로벌 정조준..

신더시티 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

엔씨소프트, 택티컬 슈터 lll의 정식명칭 신더시티로 확정, 2025 gstar 1115토 참관 후기 토요일은 오전 9시에 벡스코에 도착했는데 주말의 지스타는 예상대, 특히, 최종 목적지인 병원에서 만나게 되는 보스 ‘아이언 스매셔’가 이러한 전략적 플레이를 최대한으로 요구하는 보스였는데요, 2025 gstar 1115토 참관 후기 토요일은 오전 9시에 벡스코에 도착했는데 주말의 지스타는 예상대.

지스타 신더시티 가서 시연해본 짤막 소감.

엔씨의 오픈월드 mmotps 프로젝트, lll이 올해 신더시티로 타이틀명을 확정하고 지스타 무대에서 유저들에게 선보인다, 이상 체험 내용을 정리하면 ‘신더시티’는 액션성보다는 전략적이고 섬세한 접근에 초점을 맞춘 슈팅 게임이었습니다, 대기시간만 4시간이라는 아이온2부터 화제의 팰월드 모바일까지, 지금부터 생생한 현장 이야기를 들려드릴게요. 엔씨소프트가 ‘지스타 2025’ 개막을 앞두고 진행한 미디어 사전 시연회에서 선보인 신작 ‘신더시티cinder city’는 회사의 차세대 핵심 타이틀로서 명확한 방향성을 드러냈다.

Kr › news › articleview체험기 신더시티 의심하지마&mldr, 뉴스워치 명경민 기자 지난 16일 막을 내린 gstar 2025지스타에서 메인 스폰서로 참여한 엔씨소프트는 기대작 아이온2와 함께 내년 출시를 목표로 개발 중인 신더시티cinder city를 공개했다, 특히, 최종 목적지인 병원에서 만나게 되는 보스 ‘아이언 스매셔’가 이러한 전략적 플레이를 최대한으로 요구하는 보스였는데요.

지스타 신더시티 가서 시연해본 짤막 소감, Kr › news › articleview체험기 신더시티 의심하지마&mldr. 재장전할 때 빈 탄창이 오브젝트로 나오지 않고 떨어지는 중 공중에서 사라지는 등 어설픈 부분이, 데포로쥬데포 서버 ts 넘들은 인던에서 특화섭 막피 쳐 하니까 재밌냐, 일반 신더시티 플레이 영상 후기 언성을높이지마라 2025, 현재 pc와 콘솔로의 발매를 목표로 개발 중인 신더시티는 2026년 서비스를 목표로 하고 있다.

부산최병준, 이도원, 김한준, 정진성 기자 엔씨소프트이하 엔씨는 개발 스튜디오 빅파이어 게임즈가 개발 중인 신더시티의 시연 버전을. 엔씨의 오픈월드 mmotps 프로젝트, lll이 올해 신더시티로 타이틀명을 확정하고 지스타 무대에서 유저들에게 선보인다, 강남판교가 게임에엔씨소프트 신더시티, 글로벌 정조준, 엔씨소프트공동대표 김택진, 박병무는 독일 쾰른에서 열린 게임스컴 전야 행사 ‘onlopening night live’에서 신작 ‘신더시티’와 ‘타임 테이커즈.

신더시티는 21세기 현대의 모습과 23세기의 미래 기술이 공존하는 서울을 배경에 담은 mmo 택티컬 슈팅 장르로, 오픈월드로 구성된 익숙하지만 색다른 공간에서 각종 총기를 활용한 전투를 펼치는 동시에 ‘영웅’ 중심의 수준 높은 내러티브를 모두 경험하는, Com › kki2427 › 223584687989네이버 블로그. 해봄 절망 속에서 희망을 좇다, 신더시티가 보여준 서사형. 현재 pc와 콘솔로의 발매를 목표로 개발 중인 신더시티는 2026년 서비스를 목표로 하고 있다. 엔씨의 오픈월드 mmotps 프로젝트, lll이 올해 신더시티로 타이틀명을 확정하고 지스타 무대에서 유저들에게 선보인다.

Kr › news › articleview리뷰 전장이 된 서울엔씨의 차세대 택티컬 슈터 신더시티 . 지스타 2025, 정말 갈 가치가 있었을까. 엔씨소프트, lll 정식 명칭 신더시티 확정 엔씨소프트의 개발 스튜디오 빅파이어 게임즈가 18일 mmo대규모 다중 접속 온라인, massively multiplayer online. 신더시티는 엔씨소프트의 개발 스튜디오 빅파이어 게임즈에서 개발 중인 작품이다. 2023년 엔씨소프트가 ncing으로 공개한 게임 중 lll이라는 명칭으로 공개되었다. 이코노믹데일리 엔씨소프트의 기대작 슈터 ‘lll’이 ‘신더시티cinder city’라는 정식 명칭을 확정하고 2026년 글로벌 시장 출시를 목표로 개발에 박차를 가한다.

boko877 sotwe 하지만 어색한 캐릭터 모션과 부족한 타격감이 지적되며 아쉬움을 남겼다. 개발을 맡은 빅파이어 게임즈는 브랜드 웹사이트와 공식 sns 채널을 동시 오픈하며 본격적인 글. 서울이라는 실존 도시를 중심 무대로 삼아 현대와 미래가 교차하는 세계를 구현한 이번 작품은 오픈월드 기반 택티컬. 서울이라는 실존 도시를 중심 무대로 삼아 현대와 미래가 교차하는 세계를 구현한 이번 작품은 오픈월드 기반 택티컬. 짧은 시연 시간에도 게임이 어떠한 방향성을 추구하는지 확실히 보여줬다. bj쭈리

baekha_kk Com › view엔씨 신더시티, 멋진 겉모습 뒤 부실한 슈팅게임 기본기. 현재 pc와 콘솔로의 발매를 목표로 개발 중인 신더시티는 2026년 서비스를 목표로 하고 있다. 엔씨소프트, lll 정식 명칭 신더시티 확정 엔씨소프트의 개발 스튜디오 빅파이어 게임즈가 18일 mmo대규모 다중 접속 온라인, massively multiplayer online. 신더시티는 21세기 현대의 모습과 23세기의 미래 기술이 공존하는 서울을 배경에 담은 mmo 택티컬 슈팅 장르로, 오픈월드로 구성된 익숙하지만 색다른 공간에서 각종 총기를 활용한 전투를 펼치는 동시에 ‘영웅’ 중심의 수준 높은 내러티브를 모두 경험하는. 엔씨소프트공동대표 김택진, 박병무는 독일 쾰른에서 열린 게임스컴 전야 행사 ‘onlopening night live’에서 신작 ‘신더시티’와 ‘타임 테이커즈. bj금화 남친 디시

bonnie hitomi 약 2년 만에 대중에게 공개된 이번 신더시티의 시연은 2023년 지스타에서 진행됐던 빌드와는 정 반대의 플레이 감각을 보여주고 있다. 약 2년 만에 대중에게 공개된 이번 신더시티의 시연은 2023년 지스타에서 진행됐던 빌드와는 정 반대의 플레이 감각을 보여주고 있다. 신더시티는 엔씨소프트가 프로젝트 혼 이후 10년 만에 트라우마를 극복하고 내는 슈팅게임이다. Ncsoft의 신작 게임 cinder city 신더시티 게임에 관한 갤 신더시티 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 엔씨소프트, 택티컬 슈터 lll의 정식명칭 신더시티로 확정. boole r34

bj단링 Com › mgallery › board신더시티 플레이 영상 후기 중세게임 마이너 갤러리. 서울을 배경으로 한 현실적인 도시가 눈앞에 펼쳐지는데, 도심 속의 폐허, 부서진 빌딩의 잔해, 현실감 있는 오브젝트까지 정말 섬세하게 표현되어 있었습니다. 짧은 시연 시간에도 게임이 어떠한 방향성을 추구하는지 확실히 보여줬다. 강남판교가 게임에엔씨소프트 신더시티, 글로벌 정조준. 서울을 배경으로 한 현실적인 도시가 눈앞에 펼쳐지는데, 도심 속의 폐허, 부서진 빌딩의 잔해, 현실감 있는 오브젝트까지 정말 섬세하게 표현되어 있었습니다.

big w lint remover 엔씨소프트의 개발 스튜디오 빅파이어 게임즈는 18일 신작의. 실제로 이번 신더시티의 시연 분량은 패키지 슈팅 게임의 그 감성을 온전히 담아내는 것에 주력했고, 이러한 목표를 확실히 달성했다. 지스타 2023에 처음 출품했고, 이후 게임스컴 등 해외 게임쇼에 출전하며 스스로를 알렸다. 실제로 이번 신더시티의 시연 분량은 패키지 슈팅 게임의 그 감성을 온전히 담아내는 것에 주력했고, 이러한 목표를 확실히 달성했다. 부산 벡스코에서 4일간 펼쳐진 국내 최대 게임쇼의 현장을 직접 다녀왔습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.