Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

팬사 is short for fan sign event the korean word 팬사 comes from 팬사인회 paensainhoe, which literally means fan sign meeting. What is the difference between 팬사인회 and 팬싸인회. 제가 마지막으로 오프라인 팬사인회에 다녀온게 2019년 12월이니 벌써 4년이 다 된 셈이지요. Cette épingle a été découverte par jj.

Bj 백만송

Babymonster Deepfake

안녕하세요 ＊ρω 어제 인기가요 어땠어요.. 메인보컬을 노리는 것이 거짓이 아님을 증명했던 순간이라고 할 수도..

Bj 나탈리

이 때문에 기획사는 초동발매 일주일간의 판매량 기록을 위해 앨범 구매자 대상 쇼케이스와 팬사인회를 발매 첫 주말에 몰아 잡는다. Com › hopejoyagdol › photos희망조약돌 치어리더 박혜인, 팬 슈퍼데지의 새해맞이 팬기부 소. 오늘은 영상통화 팬사인회가 어떻게 진행되는지 설명하려고 해요, 팬들 사이에서 특정 그룹아티스트의 팬사인회 컷에 대해 공개적으로 언급하는 것은 금기사항에 해당한다, 하나 온리원 하잇 오랜만에 대면팬사하고 온리원을 만나서 행복한 시간이였어요 ‍❄️♥️엘바 케이크 귀엽당 냥옹이 아일리원 ily1 hana.

김선호 팬 소통 플랫폼 오픈 이사통으로 2026년 열일 우리나라 뿐만 아니라 전 세계 여심을 뒤흔들고 있는. Honeyworks ファンサ팬서비스 일본어 가사 독음 한국어, 팬들 사이에서 특정 그룹아티스트의 팬사인회 컷에 대해 공개적으로 언급하는 것은 금기사항에 해당한다. Cette épingle a été découverte par jj. 팬과의 교감과 최신 소식으로 가득 찬 팬싸의 매력을 느껴보세요. Days ago 헤럴드경제민상식 기자 가수 비본명 정지훈가 대만 콘서트 도중 청각장애가 있는 팬에게 범한 결례에 대해 공식 사과했다.

bks1004 soop 팬들은 당첨 확률을 조금이라도 높이기 위해 음반을 많이 살 수밖에 없다. ペンサ ノム キデハゴ イッソ！ 「ペンサ」にはもうひとつの意味が 実は、韓国やkpop好きの方々の間で「ペンサ」という言葉にはもうひとつの意味があります。 それはコンサートなどでアイドルが行う「ファンサービス」のこと. Days ago 26일 오후 4시 글로벌 팬 커뮤니케이션 플랫폼 ‘프롬’ 커뮤니티 채널과 프롬 메시지를 공식 오픈, 김선호는 팬들과 본격적인 소통에 나설 예정이다. 카메라 화면 녹화하고 음성녹음하고 그걸 또 합쳐야하는 게 귀찮은 사람들은 노트북처럼 캠이 달린 컴퓨터로 하면 되는데 pc카톡 내 얼굴이 정말 별로로 나온다 물론 꼭 노트북 탓은 아닌데 그래서. 팬사 is short for fan sign event the korean word 팬사 comes from 팬사인회 paensainhoe, which literally means fan sign meeting. bj 노아 섹스

bj 노아 벗방 Kr › article › 25108643앨범 100장 사도 팬사인회 못 가는데&mldr. 투어스 과사, 투어스 증사 만들기, 투어스 팬 애칭. 투표, 아이돌 사진, 포토카드, 커뮤니티 활동, 방송 일정, 광고, 랭킹 정보를 한곳에서 만나보세요. 특히 아티스트와 11 실시간 대화가 가능한 ‘프롬 메시지’ 오픈으로 김선호와의. Honeyworks ファンサ팬서비스 일본어 가사 독음 한국어. bj 짱아신

bondage rpg game 맑고 청량한 목소리의 고세구님과 너무나도 잘 어울린 나머지 현재 기준으로 업로드 10개월 만에 663만회의 조회수를 달성했죠. 팬사 매출액, 영업이익, 투자정보, 당기순이익, 자본금, 신용등급, 공시 주팬사재무정보. Sign can be pronounced both 사 and 싸. 맑고 청량한 목소리의 고세구님과 너무나도 잘 어울린 나머지 현재 기준으로 업로드 10개월 만에 663만회의 조회수를 달성했죠. 유명인1이 본인의 팬들을 대상으로 사인을 해주고 소통을 하는 이벤트. bj가애 섹스

bj 노아 porn Days ago 배우 김선호가 팬들과 한층 더 특별한 만남을 시작한다. Com › index강등 당했을때 대구사는 전북팬 친구가 술 사줘서 마시고 또 집 가서. 18 unis 유니스 dreamofgirls 꿈의소녀 elisia 엘리시아 kpop fyp fyppppppppppppppppppppppp 추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추. Comcandy_0728_15 덕후몰이 제대로인 팬싸 질문 리스트 포잇, 드립 포함팬싸인회 팬싸 팬사 팬사인회 질문. January 9 kku_kka_1004s profile picture.

bj오리 노출 ペンサ ノム キデハゴ イッソ！ 「ペンサ」にはもうひとつの意味が 実は、韓国やkpop好きの方々の間で「ペンサ」という言葉にはもうひとつの意味があります。 それはコンサートなどでアイドルが行う「ファンサービス」のこと. ペンサ ノム キデハゴ イッソ！ 「ペンサ」にはもうひとつの意味が 実は、韓国やkpop好きの方々の間で「ペンサ」という言葉にはもうひとつの意味があります。 それはコンサートなどでアイドルが行う「ファンサービス」のこと. What is the difference between 팬사인회 and 팬싸인회. 250802 비윗유 웃다가 의자뒤로 예대여신이랑 손잡고 뒤로 넘어감 250301 c factory 11 junhee fansign. izone アイズワン 韓国語 팬싸（ペンサ）の意味と使い方を例文で解説 팬싸（ペンサ）とは、팬 싸인회の略語でファンサイン会の意味です。 正しくは팬 사인회ですが、発音する際に「싸인」と読むので、팬싸が略語として広がっています。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.