Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2017년 유머저장소가 개설하고 운영했던 유튜브 채널. 웹툰가이드 웹툰추천, 작가인터뷰, 무. More 페이스북 유머 계정인 유머저장소와 김윾머, 김정지의 소유주 x동 님의 컨텐츠를 읽어주는 채널moremore subscribe home videos. 한 계정 정지 당하면 다른 계정으로 혐오정서, 대안우파 담론 씨부리고 거기에 이루베 성향 년놈들과 노인들이 와서 빨아주고 좋아요 눌러줌.

Fc2video

사건사고정리 60만을 이끄는 유튜버의 몰락.. Com › @윾머읽어주는남자윾머 읽어주는 남자 youtube.. 김윾머 top twitch clips.. 김윾머 유머저장소 등 페이스북 페이지를 통해 이미 인기를 끌었고, 비결은 거침없는 혐오발언이었다..

이뿐만 아니라 자신의 페이스북 개인계정 김윾머를 통하여도 같은 성향의 글들을 올리고 있다. Com › hashtag › 김윾머youtube. 17 1659 진중권 vs 김윾머 실시간 키배중 ㄷㄷㄷ.

성별로는 남성 구독자가 91%대, 여성 구독자가 8%대인 것으로 윾튜브 본인이 공개한 바 있다, 유튜버 유정호가 투자단톡방 사기 피해를 주장하며 잠적해 구독자들의 안타까움을 자아내고 있는 가운데, 김윾머가 의문을 제기했다. Join facebook to connect with 김윾머 and others you may know, 유머저장소에는 주로 인터넷 상에서 화제가 되는 이슈에 대한 게시물들이. Funny, daily @마라탕 먹으러갈사람, 15년 동안 시사보도 프로그램을 만들던 방송작가가 가짜뉴스 도살자가 되어 왔다.

Hav Missav

More 페이스북 유머 계정인 유머저장소와 김윾머, 김정지의 소유주 x동 님의 컨텐츠를 읽어주는 채널moremore subscribe home videos. 유머저장소 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, 이름이 김윾머인 사람들의 프로필을 확인해보세요. 14k followers, 357 following, 356 posts 유머저장소 @humorstorage3 on instagram @humordongsani @humordori. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the.

Last live 4 years ago.. 유머저장소 디시위키 이 페이지에 관한 정보가 없습니다.. 이와 관련하여 윾박꼼 이라는 말이 있는데, 유머저장소의 관리자 김윾머 에게 한번 저격을 당하면 꼼짝 못한다는 뜻이다.. 유튜브 윾튜브 채널 김윾머 내게도 돈 빌리려 접근회피하려 입원했을 수도 그러나 유명 크리에이터 김윾머 본명 배유근는 이같은 상황에 대해 페이스북 글을 통해 의심이 간다고 반박했다..

Goodnight Mitsuki Xfans

유튜버 유정호가 투자단톡방 사기 피해를 주장하며 잠적해 구독자들의 안타까움을 자아내고 있는 가운데. 실제로 유정호가 해당 내용을 밝혔을 때 많은 네티즌들은 유정호의 최근 행적을 거론하며 의구심을 드러냈다. 23일 인사이트가 유튜브 채널 윾튜브를 확인한 결과 youtube 커뮤니티, X x 요즘 초등학생 직업손호도 1위가 유튜버라고 할.

폴리뉴스윤청신 기자유머저장소와 유튜버 윾튜브에 대한 네티즌들의 관심이 쏟아지고 있다. 유머저장소 는 극우 성향의 콘텐츠를 생산하는 페이스북 페이지이다. 유정호는 최근 자신의 페이스북에 마지막 인사. More 페이스북 유머 계정인 유머저장소와 김윾머, 김정지의 소유주 x동 님의 컨텐츠를 읽어주는 채널 more more subscribe home videos. 폴리뉴스윤청신 기자유머저장소와 유튜버 윾튜브에 대한 네티즌들의 관심이 쏟아지고 있다.

hanime flim13 유튜버 유정호가 투자단톡방 사기 피해를 주장하며 잠적해 구독자들의 안타까움을 자아내고 있는 가운데. 영상에 나온 오메기떡 좌표 0647471670. 김윾머 top twitch clips. 유머저장소는 대한민국의 김윾머본명 배유근라는 필명의 사용자가 운영하는 페이스북 페이지이다. Overview streams games subs statistics clips. femdom 예린

haja10 korean 유튜브 채널 ‘가로세로연구소이하 가세연’이 9번째 채널로 복귀한 윾튜브를 저격했다. 구독자 60만의 윾튜브는 하루 아침에 탄생한 것이 아니다. 열거하기에 너무 길어지므로 생략하지만 원래 반인륜적인 놈이다가 이런 면에서는 찬우보다 더한 새끼니까 동조하지 참고로 윾머가 흑자. 실제로 유정호가 해당 내용을 밝혔을 때 많은 네티즌들은 유정호의 최근 행적을 거론하며 의구심을 드러냈다. 17 1659 진중권 vs 김윾머 실시간 키배중 ㄷㄷㄷ. girl pooping sotwe

femdom 23 sotwe X x 요즘 초등학생 직업손호도 1위가 유튜버라고 할. 구독자 60만의 윾튜브는 하루 아침에 탄생한 것이 아니다. 어제 포텐 간 윾머저장소윾튜브의 만행들 유머움짤이슈. 영상에 나온 오메기떡 좌표 0647471670. 유정호는 최근 자신의 페이스북에 마지막 인사. haerin pikpak

fc2ppv4806909 이유 알아보기 유머저장소 디시위키 하지만, 일부는 일반적인 위키위키처럼 진지하게 쓰거나, 디시식 유머 코드를 삽입 일간베스트 저장소 디시인사이드다운 거친 어투로 작성되어 있어 그렇지 딱히 디시위키주요 문서 모음 정치, 유머. 좋아하는 사람 752823명 이야기하고 있는 사람들 28373명. 유튜브 채널 ‘가로세로연구소이하 가세연’이 9번째 채널로 복귀한 윾튜브를 저격했다. 유정호는 최근 자신의 페이스북에 마지막 인사. 포텐 터짐 최신순 유머움짤이슈 유머 2021.

haewon fap challenge 유튜버 유정호가 투자단톡방 사기 피해를 주장하며 잠적해 구독자들의 안타까움을 자아내고 있는 가운데. 그러나 2019년 1월 23일 경고 3회로 영구정지되어. 기존 게시글은 전부 삭제되었고 새로 시작할 예정이라고. 현재 활성화된 그의 개인 페이스북 계정은 김윾머, 김정지 가 있다. 일베저장소 4 유머저장소는 여러 커뮤니티에서 일베 2중대, 일베 멀티로 여겨진다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.