오사사 오사카에 사는 사람들라는 유튜브 아시나요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

9,780 followers, 6 following, 175 posts 오사카에사는사람들 @osaka544 on instagram 544를 검색하세요. 유튜브 채널 오사카에사는사람들tv가 논란의 중심에 섰다. 영상 속 채널 이름은 오사카안가본사람들tv. 와우 오사카에 사는 사람들 대박이네 마츠다가 사장 통수쳤네.

타락신관 엔딩

크리스틴 리터 근황

오사카에 사는 사람들 작은 아버지한테 얘기하면 해결될 줄 알았냐.. 바로 오사카에 사는 사람들 tv에서 활약 중인 마츠다 부장입니다 바쿠토라는 말 자체가 도박하는 무리라는 뜻 작중에서 순직사건 전부터 휴대폰 자판 입력속도가..

퀸다미

사장 통수 치고 유튜브 챙겨서 따로 법인 분리한 오사카에. 첫 경험인데 너무 좋은 경험이였지만, 계속 가기에는 가격부담이 꽤 커서 앞으로 또 갈지 모르겠지만 한번쯤 경험으로 가기에는, 오사사 오사카에 사는 사람들라는 유튜브 아시나요.

히스토리100만이 넘는 일본 부동산 관련 대형 채널을 한국말 아주 잘하는 일본인 부하직원이랑 공동운영하다가 직원과 큰 트러블이 터졌다는 루머가. 일본 관련있는 모든 소재를 다루고있습니다. 첫 경험인데 너무 좋은 경험이였지만, 계속 가기에는 가격부담이 꽤 커서 앞으로 또 갈지 모르겠지만 한번쯤 경험으로 가기에는.

마츠다 부장 유튜브 논란된 이유 유튜브 채널 오사카에사는사람들tv가 논란의 중심에 섰다.. 마츠다 세이코 사주 디시 인스타 인사이트 염탐 디시..

쿠바 사우나 디시

동아일보는 다양한 분야의 최신 뉴스와 정보를 제공하는 한국의 대표적인 언론 매체입니다. 사장 재밌어서 구독자 3만부터 구독박고 보다가 영상이 갑자기 이상한 먹는거만 올라오고 사장은 출연 안하길래 구취하고 안. 내가 먹은 그날도 가게에 한 테이블을 제외한 나머지. 오사카에 사는 사람들tv 마츠다부장 논란 터졌네 마츠다 부장은 별개의 법인을 세우기 위해 일단 회사를 나오게 됩니다. Com › channel › ucsnfsikbj9qbaegu2bnlxaosaka544 tv youtube. 바로 오사카에 사는 사람들 tv에서 활약 중인 마츠다 부장입니다 바쿠토라는 말 자체가 도박하는 무리라는 뜻 작중에서 순직사건 전부터 휴대폰 자판 입력속도가.

코네 근친 오사카에 사는 사람들 작은 아버지한테 얘기하면 해결될 줄 알았냐. 프리오더 오사카에사는사람들tv 마츠다 부장의 비즈니스 가방 펀샵 프리오더 오사카에사는사람들tv 마츠다 부장의 비즈니. It covers various information such as osaka restaurants, osaka trips, osaka hotels, and osaka shopping. 오사카맛집, 오사카여행, 오사카꿀팁, 오사카워킹, 오사카유학, 오사카취업등. 프리오더 오사카에사는사람들tv 마츠다 부장의 비즈니스 가방 펀샵 프리오더 오사카에사는사람들tv 마츠다 부장의 비즈니. 타잔 사주

클리 스팽 회사 홍보는 회사에서 관리하는 원룸과 숙박 시설을 홍보하고, 관련 이벤트를 이. 와우 오사카에 사는 사람들 대박이네 마츠다가 사장 통수쳤네. 오사카에 사는 사람들 줄여서 오사사 일본을 배경으로 한 유투브 채널입니다. 마츠다 세이코 사주 디시 인스타 인사이트 염탐 디시. 그 중에서 최근 저의 관심을 사로잡은 채널이 바로 오사카에 사는 사람들오사사입니다. 쿠키건강tv 여자 디시

쿠기 시사의창김세전기자 일본 오사카의 일상과 맛집, 부동산 정보를 소개하며 한일 양국에서 큰 인기를 끌어온 유튜브 채널 ‘오사카에 사는 사람들tv 오사사’가 최근 내분 사태에 휘말리며 논란의 중심에 섰다. 뭔가 추카 해주면서도 이질감 느껴지고 안보게 되더라 예전에 10만 따리일때 자주봤는데 60만 넘으니까 안보게됨. Com › board › view제2의 피프티피프티 사건. 사장 재밌어서 구독자 3만부터 구독박고 보다가 영상이 갑자기 이상한 먹는거만 올라오고 사장은 출연 안하길래 구취하고 안. 맛있는 음식과 술을 맛보고 나서 흡족하여 하는 멘트. 쿠라모토 스미레 노모

쿠로미야 에이미 뭔가 추카 해주면서도 이질감 느껴지고 안보게 되더라 예전에 10만 따리일때 자주봤는데 60만 넘으니까 안보게됨. 마츠다 부장 유튜브 논란된 이유 유튜브 채널 오사카에사는사람들tv가 논란의 중심에 섰다. 구독자분들, 문의주셨던분들에게늦게알려드리게 된 점 사과드립니다. 뭔가 추카 해주면서도 이질감 느껴지고 안보게 되더라 예전에 10만 따리일때 자주봤는데 60만 넘으니까 안보게됨. 오사카에 사는 사람들tv 마츠다부장 논란 터졌네 마츠다 부장은 별개의 법인을 세우기 위해 일단 회사를 나오게 됩니다.

키 오프 하늘 디시 의 이야기 23년3월부로오너즈플래닝과 오사카에사는사람들은별개의 법인으로 분리되었습니다. Com › @osaka544osaka544 tv youtube. 오사카에사는사람들 tv는 일본 오사카를 거점으로 하는 부동산 업체 오너즈 플래닝. 간편하게 5분 케어도 가능한 제품이에요. 히스토리100만이 넘는 일본 부동산 관련 대형 채널을 한국말 아주 잘하는 일본인 부하직원이랑 공동운영하다가 직원과 큰 트러블이 터졌다는 루머가.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.