Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Apple 最新發表的 iphone 16 系列帶來了幾項顯著的升級，讓科技愛好者感到興奮不已。1. 我：「？？？？？不是 必勝客的訂單系統，非常有問題！ b21 241122 2148. 即時更新 duolingo的最新文章與社群討論，掌握duolingo的第一手資訊與觀點分享. The fastest ai for scanning cards, creating digital inventory, listing to marketplaces, and 10xing revenue.

히토미 엘렌 조

히토미 부녀

히토미 수학여행

히토미엔주

我：「？？？？？不是 必勝客的訂單系統，非常有問題！ b21 241122 2148. Instantly block new purchases and cash advances—while allowing recurring transactions, payments, balance transfers and credits to continue without disruption. Why cant i use midnight draw, Com › defaultciti® card benefits credit card benefits for citi customers. 達美樂披薩外送外帶 網路訂餐 dominos tw.

各位投資人大家好，我是板主「六月十一」。 歡迎來到本股票看板！這裡是給大家討論 股票 相關話題的地方，內容不限於台股，只要是跟股市有關的知識、觀點、經驗，都非常歡迎分享。不過還是要提醒大家，發文請盡量聚焦在股市主題，並遵守板規。如果有違規內容，我會透過後台處理，系統也.. Tw › search必勝客 的相關討論與真實心得｜dcard.. 好吃的sushi在爭鮮～歡迎大家蒞臨爭鮮迴轉壽司，（好險版上還沒有人介紹過），不管是吃過的也好沒吃過的也好，或是忠實顧客又或者是厭惡爭鮮的，都來一起窺探爭鮮的面貌吧！，下文會用主題方式講解，希望大家能更認識爭鮮 員工告訴你,餐飲店員告訴你..

히토미 스크롤 뷰어

網路購物板主要提供線上購物之經驗分享與網購教學討論。 或是在網購前中後遇到問題也能在此發文尋求卡友的幫忙。, 達美樂披薩外送外帶 網路訂餐 dominos tw. 搭好！ 直接進入主題，有人畢業後嘗試登入過教育部的健康體育護照嗎？裡面紀錄了 國小. New to the world of debit cards, 當您在必勝客中購買商品時，可以在取貨處檢查要使用的優惠代碼。 您也可以通過登錄個人帳戶查看帳戶擁有的優惠券。 折價券具有相應的使用規則和範圍，只要客戶的訂單滿足這些.

我：「所以呢？」 店員：「所以只能幫妳取消」, 網路購物板主要提供線上購物之經驗分享與網購教學討論。 或是在網購前中後遇到問題也能在此發文尋求卡友的幫忙。. 0614 for updates on your disputed transaction s, 小孩子不懂事，需要由家長以言教身教等 必勝客「個人餐」89元起 即日起至9月8日期間，「三商炸雞」針對中元普渡推出.

히토미 지하철 達美樂披薩外送外帶 網路訂餐 dominos tw. 如果爆單， 建議店家主動取消訂單， 暫時關閉接單吧， 午餐都要變下午茶了。 更新：14：16收到餐點了， 一共等了3小時又2分鐘。 ‍. 台灣pizza hut披薩外送外帶熱送到府！線上訂購多種豐富披薩口味，各式網路訂餐優惠超值套餐外送菜單dm和個人餐組合！. 平常突然想吃披薩的時候，因為必勝客就在我們家附近，我們家的第一首選就是必勝客！，我們家都是買外帶買大送大，然後配一點小點心這樣。昨天晚上我和家人的中秋餐，吃的就是必勝客！想順便分享一下這次吃的口味給大 必勝客,披薩,美食. 達美樂披薩外送外帶 網路訂餐 dominos tw. 히토미러

히토미 흑화 門號退租 門號退租係指使用的門號不再使用了，退租後門號號碼會被電信業者收回但不必回收sim卡。申請門號退租，要本人攜帶雙證件一定到電信業者的 read more. 更大的螢幕與更窄的邊框：iphone 16 pro 配備 6. 重要更新，jennie （雖然說測出infp， infj），真實人格已分析為 isfp。，這篇要介紹最紅的人格：infp，特點1：infp 是蠻內向，很安靜的人格。infp 是最容易刪 infp,mbti,infp,mbti. Dcard 議員 達比修有：我還不會退 vspo 銀城 ko 3. Apple 最新發表的 iphone 16 系列帶來了幾項顯著的升級，讓科技愛好者感到興奮不已。1. 히토미 언더테일

히토미 에토리 即時更新 取消訂單的最新文章與社群討論，掌握取消訂單的第一手資訊與觀點分享. 3 吋螢幕，而 pro ma iphone,apple,ios,手機,iphone. 謝謝大家熱烈回應啦，很多留言 有看到正面的、抒發的、心酸的、有做一年爽爽的（很想捏死）、也有4～5年做到心情很複雜的（b65看了好心酸），不管你們愛不愛麥當勞我就是不推啦xdd，但若真的愛這份工作就認真做下去吧 工作經驗,麥胞,餐飲業. How to become a dcard creator. 2024年6月必勝客pizza hut 優惠代碼總整理 聯盟行銷. 히토미 코드

히토미 사이트에 연결할 수 없음 디시 門號退租 門號退租係指使用的門號不再使用了，退租後門號號碼會被電信業者收回但不必回收sim卡。申請門號退租，要本人攜帶雙證件一定到電信業者的 read more. 訂單送出後，如欲更改、取消、確認或有其他需求，需麻煩您主動與外送／外帶的服務門市聯絡。 預約訂購送達或領取時間，依各門市執行狀況，若門市有需修改送達或領取時間，. 我目前經營蝦皮賣場5年多 有過很多次客人退換貨經驗，也有過客人東西退回來壞掉或是缺件，這邊給新手賣家一些建議避免各位被蝦皮安心退弄，首先要知道蝦皮安心退機制是非常非常非常偏袒買家的，只要買家隨便說商品 蝦皮,退貨. 平常突然想吃披薩的時候，因為必勝客就在我們家附近，我們家的第一首選就是必勝客！，我們家都是買外帶買大送大，然後配一點小點心這樣。昨天晚上我和家人的中秋餐，吃的就是必勝客！想順便分享一下這次吃的口味給大 必勝客,披薩,美食. Instantly block new purchases and cash advances—while allowing recurring transactions, payments, balance transfers and credits to continue without disruption.

히토미 북마크 디시 Make the most of everything your aaa visa signature card has to offer. 1,130,051 likes 14,691 talking about this. Make the most of everything your aaa visa signature card has to offer. Learn what a debit card is and why you might need one. Cc › bbs › fastfood問題 必勝客線上訂單填錯 送出後沒辦法改了嗎 看板 fastfood 批.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.