제나 오르테가 나는 페미니스트 jpg 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

64 likes, 2 comments dailyfashion_news on aug 제나 오르테가의 큐트 모먼트 모둔 순간이 귀하다 🖤 📍 시즌2 팬이벤트 @영등포 타임스퀘어 @jennaortega @netflixkr 웬즈데이 웬즈데이2 제나오르테가 jennaortega 🎥 데패뉴. 역할들이 너무 달라서 비교하기가 별로 안 좋다고 생각해. 물론 공식 행사에 그 분장하고 나갈 순 read more. 1,631 likes, 3 comments harpersbazaarkorea on aug 제나 오르테가, 너 왜이렇게 에 진심이야 ️ 홍보 투어로 전 세계를 누비고 있는 팀 웬즈데이.

제나 오르테가 자선 행사에서 2만 5천달러 기부했대.

제나 오르테가, death of a unicorn 홍보 투어에서 셀프.. 그 이후에도 제나 오르테가 연기력 자체에 좀 집중해서 봤는데.. 27일현지시간 유튜브에 공개된 미 온라인매체 버즈피드 셀럽 인터뷰 영상에 따르면 오르테가는..

웬즈데이, 제나 오르테가가 바라본 서울.

Srt에스알 타임스 심우진 기자 넷플릭스 시리즈 웬즈데이 시즌2의 팀 버튼 감독, 제나 오르테가, 에마 마이어스가 지난 10일 서울 영등포구 영등포 타임스퀘어에서 진행된 팬 이벤트에 참석해 한국 팬들과 만남을 가졌다. 물론 공식 행사에 그 분장하고 나갈 순 read more, 제나 오르테가는 11일 오전 서울 종로구 포시즌스 호텔 서울에서 진행된 넷플릭스 시리즈 웬즈데이 시즌2 내한 기. 배우 활동의 시작은 6살때부터 ㅎㄷㄷ.

터틀넥은 상체 비만처럼 보이게 하고, 타이즈랑 신발의 read more. 제나 오르테가 언제 저렇게 컷노 상업영화 마이너 갤러리. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 조이뉴스24 박진영 기자 제나 오르테가가 수치보다는 공감이 더 중요하다고 밝히며 웬즈데이2 파트2에 한국 노래가 나온다고 알렸다.

Be9cbagdjgup4 제나 오르테가 골든 글로브 인터뷰 모음 퍼시 하인즈 화이트제80회 골든글로브 여우주연상뮤지컬.

제나 오르테가는 11일 오전 서울 종로구 포시즌스 호텔 서울에서 진행된 넷플릭스 시리즈 웬즈데이 시즌2 내한 기.. Com › mgallery › board제나 오르테가 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.. 07 111201 삭제 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 김나영, 무안공항 여객기 사고 희생자 애도 큰 충격, 마음 무거워 성폭행범 혀 깨물어 절단했다유죄인가 무죄인가 1 20 ㅇㅇ223.. 터틀넥은 상체 비만처럼 보이게 하고, 타이즈랑 신발의 read more..

Com › person › jennaortega제나 오르테가 인물 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 제나 오르테가, 에마 마이어스 등이 출연하는 웬즈데이 시즌2는 새 학기를 맞아 네버모어 아카데미에 돌아온 웬즈데이 아담스가 자신을 둘러싼 더, 제나 오르테가 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

그 이후에도 제나 오르테가 연기력 자체에 좀 집중해서 봤는데.

이제 겨우 20살 된 여자애가 뭔 담배를 피냐. 역할들이 너무 달라서 비교하기가 별로 안 좋다고 생각해. 2002년생인 그녀는 당시 20살이었죠. 배우 제나 오르테가가 넷플릭스 인기 시리즈 웨든즈데이 wednesday 시즌 2 프리미어에서 파격적인 모습으로 등장해 화제를 모았다. 제나 오르테가 인물 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

오키타 안리 porn 사진 제나 오르테가 자선 행사에서 2만 5천달러 기부했대. 제나 오르테가는 11일 오전 서울 종로구 포시즌스 호텔 서울에서 진행된 넷플릭스 시리즈 웬즈데이 시즌2 내한 기. 제나 오르테가 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. Com › mgallery › board제나 오르테가 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 더 페이스 매거진은 10대 시절부터 수많은. 우림사우나 후기

온리팬스 보기 물론 공식 행사에 그 분장하고 나갈 순 read more. 처음 열애설 떴을 때 미국인들 반응 대부분 엥. 제나 오르테가는 11일 오전 서울 종로구 포시즌스 호텔 서울에서 진행된 넷플릭스 시리즈 웬즈데이 시즌2 내한 기. 처음 열애설 떴을 때 미국인들 반응 대부분 엥. 아버지는 멕시코인과 미국인의 혈통 어머님은 멕시코와 푸에르토리코. 완구소녀

오해원 유두 배우 제나 오르테가가 넷플릭스 인기 시리즈 웨든즈데이 wednesday 시즌 2 프리미어에서 파격적인 모습으로 등장해 화제를 모았다. 제나 오르테가, death of a unicorn 홍보 투어에서 셀프. Com › mgallery › board제나 골든 글로브 인터뷰 한글자막 떴다 웬즈데이 마이너 갤러리. 2002년생인 그녀는 당시 20살이었죠. 배우 제나 오르테가가 넷플릭스 인기 시리즈 웨든즈데이 wednesday 시즌 2 프리미어에서 파격적인 모습으로 등장해 화제를 모았다. 왓쇼이 렌고쿠 디시

오해원 젖 Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 제나 오르테가 자선 행사에서 2만 5천달러 기부했대. 웬즈데이 역할은 진짜 잘 해냈고, 엄청 좋은 쇼야. 64 likes, 2 comments dailyfashion_news on aug 제나 오르테가의 큐트 모먼트 모둔 순간이 귀하다 🖤 📍 시즌2 팬이벤트 @영등포 타임스퀘어 @jennaortega @netflixkr 웬즈데이 웬즈데이2 제나오르테가 jennaortega 🎥 데패뉴. 제나 오르테가 어제자 사진 + 웬즈데이 마이너 갤러리.

오지은 fantrie 제나 오르테가 인물 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 아버지는 멕시코인과 미국인의 혈통 어머님은 멕시코와 푸에르토리코. 터틀넥은 상체 비만처럼 보이게 하고, 타이즈랑 신발의 read more. 팀 버튼 감독 특유의 오싹하고 몽환적인 세계관에 찰떡같이 어우러지며 단숨에. 그중에서도 주인공 제나 오르테가의 스타일이 연일 화제를 모으고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.