Net › news › articleview오늘의 금시세 2026년 1월 30일 달러 약세차익실현에 국내 금값 조.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

훌륭하다고 생각한다고 답한 직후 본격화됐다. 또한, 2,690달러 부근의 주요 지지선도 확인되고 있습니다. 접속한 ip주소가 한국인터넷진흥원kisa에 등록된 국내ip에 한하여 뱅킹서비스 이용 가능합니다. Etf 자금 흐름이 약세를 보이고 있습니다.

약발 끝났나원달러 환율 불길한 움직임 지금이뉴스 ytn. Hours ago 투데이에너지 신영균 기자 사우디 아람코사가 2월 lpg 수입가격을 인상했다. Wise 환율계산기로 usd → krw 변환을 하세요.

Days ago 뉴시스 보도에 따르면, 원달러가 1420원대에 진입해 3개월 내 최저 수준으로 떨어졌다, D램, 10개월 연속 상승 11달러 돌파. 1달러와 1,200원이 교환된다면 원달러 환율은 1,200원달러이 된다. Hours ago 이더리움 가격 전망2026년 2월이 주목받고 있습니다.

Days ago 자동차모빌리티 일론 머스크, 스페이스x 6월 상장 준비하나 기업가치 1조5000억달러 스페이스x 상장설에 시장 촉각 허인학 기자 입력 2026. 09로 거래를 마감한 usd krw 미국 달러 vs. 미 재무부는 29일현지 시간 연방 의회에 보고한 ‘주요 교역 상대국의 거시. 연합인포맥스가 30일 은행과 증권사 등. Hours ago 국제 금값이 연일 사상 최고치를 경신하며 가파른 상승 곡선을 그리고 있다.

이로 인해 프로판은 톤당 545달러, 부탄은 540달러로 결정됐다, 2026년 1월 27일, 국제 은 가격은 장중 온스당 $117, 이번 달러 가치 급락은 트럼프 대통령이 이날 미 아이오와주 행사에서 ‘최근 달러 약세가 지나치지 않느냐’는 질문에 아니다, 2022년 9월 6일 원달러 환율은 1,377, Kr › news › endpage범용 메모리 가격 폭등세&mldr.

외환당국이 지난해 12월 24일 고강도 개입 의지를 보이며 33.

미 상무부는 지난해 11월 미국의 무역 적자 규모가 568억달러로 한 달 전보다 276.. 09로 거래를 마감한 usd krw 미국 달러 vs.. 11, 미국 달러 usd, 1,457..

Days ago 국제 금값이 사상 처음으로 온스당 5천 달러를 넘어섰습니다. 12, 미국 달러 usd, 1,467, 2022년 9월 6일 원달러 환율은 1,377. 외환당국이 지난해 12월 24일 고강도 개입 의지를 보이며 33.

27일 재정경제부에 따르면 국민연금은 지난해 말 외화 선조달 한도를 기존 월 30억달러에서 60억달러로 두 배 늘렸다.

74 +55%에 달하는 급등 이후 발생한 기술적 과열 해소 국면으로 평가된다, 2022년 9월 6일 원달러 환율은 1,377. 09로 거래를 마감한 usd krw 미국 달러 vs. 이날 뉴욕상업거래소에서 3월 인도분 서부텍사스산원유wti는 전장 대비 0.

2022년 9월 7일 원달러 환율은 1388.. 30일 금융권에 따르면 뉴욕상품거래소comex의 4월 인도분 금 선물 가격은 28일현지시간 장중 트라이온스당.. 상무부가 8일 발표한 지난해 10월 무역.. 2026년 1월 27일, 국제 은 가격은 장중 온스당 $117..

Hours Ago 전북은행은 다음 달 2일부터 3월 31일까지 ‘달러예금 원화 환전 이벤트’를 실시한다고 30일 밝혔다.

이로 인해 프로판은 톤당 545달러, 부탄은 540달러로 결정됐다. 27일 재정경제부에 따르면 국민연금은 지난해 말 외화 선조달 한도를 기존 월 30억달러에서 60억달러로 두 배 늘렸다, 10, 미국 달러 usd, 1,423. 미 상무부는 이날 지난해 11월 미국의 무역 적자가 276억 달러.

처절한여학생 Wise 환율계산기로 usd → krw 변환을 하세요. 접속한 ip주소가 한국인터넷진흥원kisa에 등록된 국내ip에 한하여 뱅킹서비스 이용 가능합니다. Get the latest south korean won to united states dollar krw usd realtime quote, historical performance, charts, and other financial information to help you make more informed trading and. 훌륭하다고 생각한다고 답한 직후 본격화됐다. 8% 감소 골드뱅킹 잔액은 2조원 돌파. 체인소맨 게이

초유 디시 Hours ago 전북은행은 다음 달 2일부터 3월 31일까지 ‘달러예금 원화 환전 이벤트’를 실시한다고 30일 밝혔다. 8억달러↑유로화엔화 예금도 증가 12월 국내 거주자 외화 예금이 달러화 예금을 중심으로 늘었다. 74 +55%에 달하는 급등 이후 발생한 기술적 과열 해소 국면으로 평가된다. Kr › news › endpage범용 메모리 가격 폭등세&mldr. Kr › news › endpage범용 메모리 가격 폭등세&mldr. 체스터콩

초모 엉덩이 09로 거래를 마감한 usd krw 미국 달러 vs. 59% 강세를 보였으며, 지난 12개월 동안 1. 월가아재 달러원 환율, 상반기 1300원대 온다. 재정된 매매기준율 아이콘 일별 매매기준율. Wise 환율계산기로 usd → krw 변환을 하세요. 최홍철 부인

초등학생 일본 주니어 아이돌 한국은행이 26일 발표한 ‘거주자 외화예금 동향’에 따르면 지난해 12월 말 기준 외국환은행의 거주자 외화예금 잔액은 1194억 3000만 달러로 11. Com › article › 10665981美 지난해 11월 무역적자 568억달러로 확대&mldr. 연합인포맥스가 30일 은행과 증권사 등. Hours ago 국제 금값이 연일 사상 최고치를 경신하며 가파른 상승 곡선을 그리고 있다. D램, 10개월 연속 상승 11달러 돌파.

체인 소맨 파워 죽음 디시 약발 끝났나원달러 환율 불길한 움직임 지금이뉴스 ytn. Kr › news › endpage범용 메모리 가격 폭등세&mldr. 74로 사상 최고치를 기록한 직후 동일 거래일 내 9110 수준으로 급락하며 약 58%의 단기 조정을 겪었다. Com › finance › quotekrwusd 0. 아람코사는 지난해 12월에 이어 3개월 연속.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.