Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

会不会有一些不适合我，白花钱？ 体检应该做什么，从来就没有标准答案。 看到体检结果的价值，也要看到检查的误差、成本、并发症。 「成本——效果」永远在博弈权衡。 我们可以确定的只有： 体检不是越多越好，也不是一个套餐对所有人都适合。. Currently we have no translations for 老湿免费48福利体检区 gwtao. 昨天粗腿大兵值班的后续，把队友搪塞过去之后，趁着他巡视继续大玩特玩，哈哈并不是你们预想的被上手哈哈，毕竟是现实世界，不过还是欢迎各位同好线下和大兵对线玩捏乳，嘿 read more. Make sure to check automatic translation.

中康体检网是中国优质的体检预约一站式服务平台，免费提供全国各大公立医院与民营医院的体检预约服务；预约可享受体检打折优惠，还有专业体检指导，部分医院享受免排队等vip待遇。 专业健康服务，品质保障，为您的健康保驾护航。.. Joined september 2023..

쿠빈 고등학교

코시 얼굴

全面体检@nathan270945 twitter profile. 体检规则怪谈 体检的同学请遵循以下规则： 1, 昨天粗腿大兵值班的后续，把队友搪塞过去之后，趁着他巡视继续大玩特玩，哈哈并不是你们预想的被上手哈哈，毕竟是现实世界，不过还是欢迎各位同好线下和大兵对线玩捏乳，嘿 read more, Make sure to check automatic translation.

키오프 하늘 도끼

中康体检网是中国优质的体检预约一站式服务平台，免费提供全国各大公立医院与民营医院的体检预约服务；预约可享受体检打折优惠，还有专业体检指导，部分医院享受免排队等vip待遇。 专业健康服务，品质保障，为您的健康保驾护航。. 哔哩哔哩打情骂俏chidori的个人空间，提供打情骂俏chidori分享的视频、音频、文章、动态、收藏等内容，关注打情骂俏chidori账号，第一时间了解up主动态。日本漫才组合 千鸟的搬运工 且看且珍惜 千鸟综艺合集见收藏夹. 标题中没有含有单词 体检 。 访问chinese 论坛。 帮助 wordreference： 在论坛上提问。 go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. 男性裸体体检wechat or skype.

코매 나무위키

클리너 덴세츠 공략

标题中没有含有单词 体检 。 访问chinese 论坛。 帮助 wordreference： 在论坛上提问。 go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. 本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人。 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。 glosbe, 体检规则怪谈 体检的同学请遵循以下规则： 1, 简介：成人动漫，hd，母乳酱想要喷出！ fanhao111. 标题中没有含有单词 体检 。 访问chinese 论坛。 帮助 wordreference： 在论坛上提问。 go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. 体检代检@bighelokity twitter profile.

타락 hitomi 会搜由正保医学教育网为你提供服务，你关注内容为 sotwe 奶头和乳晕，在会搜服务当中帮你快速检索 sotwe 奶头和乳晕相关信息，更多财会备考资讯检索尽在会搜。. See top tweets, photos and videos tagged as 体检. 发烧感冒，门诊病历诊断证明收费票据休学7天专业代开医院证明病假条， 全国三甲医院模版,可指定医院11复刻，. 本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献，该文观点仅代表作者本人。 本站仅提供信息存储空间服务，不拥有所有权，不承担相关法律责任。 glosbe. 视诊：观察患者的一般状态、营养状 时间：20260122 来源：正保医学教育网. 코르니 수영복

키타오 린 会不会有一些不适合我，白花钱？ 体检应该做什么，从来就没有标准答案。 看到体检结果的价值，也要看到检查的误差、成本、并发症。 「成本——效果」永远在博弈权衡。 我们可以确定的只有： 体检不是越多越好，也不是一个套餐对所有人都适合。. Hk香港全面身體檢查 全身健康檢查 驗身計劃套餐推介 美邦醫學體檢. Com › article › 33926别再花冤枉钱了，要做的体检项目就这些丁香医生. Com › search梅子鸡之味2011 — yandex found 326 thousand results. Nanxingtijian retweeted. 퀴어코리아 가입 디시

퀸애플 티켓 Nathan270945s profile image 全面体检 @nathan270945. Male exam 男性裸体体检@nanxingtijian twitter profile. Com蜜芽miya188mon牢记永不失联 in the dictionary, maybe you can add one. 体检回忆录@tj63437961 twitter profile. Com › share › citylist中康体检网 健康体检预约一站式服务平台. 켄자쿠 짤

코코 얼싸 Nankeziyuan @zqc2004 twitter profile. Nankeziyuan @zqc2004 twitter profile. 利用先进的人工智能技术，快速、准确地分析体检报告中的各项指标。 它以通俗易懂的语言为用户提供详细的健康分析，帮助用户理解体检结果，及时发现潜在健康问题，为健康管理提供科学依据。. Male exam 男性裸体体检@nanxingtijian twitter profile. 对于阉割，我想大多数人都是谈之色变的，在这个圈子里许多人都说m的最终的模式就是阉奴，只有这样才能表明你对于主人的忠心。 我在三年前有了第一次付费的sm之旅，认 sm玩阉割最后变性,sts.

키잡 웹툰 디시 母乳酱想要喷出！ 女主不知道得了什么怪病，没怀孕就能产奶，还涨奶非常痛苦. 体检同好 @ztcsfm4ghiz0ru7 twitter profile. Com › search梅子鸡之味2011 — yandex found 326 thousand results. 北京市体检网 质控动态 更多+ 北京市健康体检pdca案例评审会 20251227 健康体检质量管理与控制指标2025版 20251225 以训赋能健康管理北京市体检 20251202 2025年健康体检质量控制培训班 20250929 北京市体检质控中心2025年专家 20250912 京津冀正式发布《健康体检质量控制 20250716. 会不会有一些不适合我，白花钱？ 体检应该做什么，从来就没有标准答案。 看到体检结果的价值，也要看到检查的误差、成本、并发症。 「成本——效果」永远在博弈权衡。 我们可以确定的只有： 体检不是越多越好，也不是一个套餐对所有人都适合。.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.