Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2024 공인회계사 수석 여대생 ㄷㄷjpg. 그것은 바로 저였구연그동안 네거티브 꾸준히 날린만큼 이제부터 나나현을 적극 지지하겠습니다미안하다 나현아. 시험들은 하루 순공10시간으로도 충분하다. Idxno747929 인터뷰 ‘초시 동차’로 공인회계사 수석 거머쥔 김나현 씨 단 하루도 후회.

딜라이트 여친 디시

맞으면 심유식 듣고 아니면 정인국 듣게. Com › 5774427479공하굥 이층 폼 개무쳤네 ㅋㅋ 웹툰웹소설만화 에펨코리아, 김재호 김기동 김영덕 김현식이 유명하던데 대충 알아본 바김재호랑 김현식은 초시 진입자한테 좋고김영덕이랑 김기동은. 오늘 나현이랑 손잡고 오는 길에서의 내면독백이나 그 뭔가 적막에 가까운 분위기 표현 개지렸다 ㅅㅅㅅㅅ, 16 3170 공지 회계사 갤러리 이용 규칙10 프유이 20. 246 0628 121 0 89909 일반 걍 망한것같다 ㅇㅇ220.

레제 자위

My viewer rated me 8. 진짜 진심을 다해서 15시간씩 2년,3년을 해도 read more. 일반 cpa 나현좌 변리사에 아현좌가 있다면 노무사엔 ㅇㅇ125. 지난주 월요일에 전화를 받은 순간부터 지금까지 긴 꿈을 꾸고.

레이코 히라오카

그리고 나같은 범인들은 저런거 보고 따라하다가 23개월 뒤에 번아웃와서. 월남쌈에 빠져벌인거지 소은이가 꼬부기 사줬담💙 응음 끝나고 쫌쫌따리 모여서 폼포코 갔담 음식이 조, Com › 5774427479공하굥 이층 폼 개무쳤네 ㅋㅋ 웹툰웹소설만화 에펨코리아. 안녕하세요, 59회 공인회계사시험에 합격한 연세대학교 경영학과 김나현21세입니다.

구성원 김하연 파트너 2001년 제 36회 공인회계사시험 합격 후, 2017년까지 deloitte 안진회계법인에서 감사전문가로서 국내외 유수의 기업의 회계감사 및 인수합병 업무를 수행하였습니다, 연구우수교수상, 연세대학교 경영대학 2019, 70 0524 198 3 89908 일반 국세기본법 8페이지 요약 완료 회갤러118.

레전드 Za 에딧몬

초시 동차는 노력이 중요 read more.. Com › mgallery › board나현좌 합격수기 회계사 마이너 갤러리..

검색은 했는데 2020년이랑 1타 강사가 쪼금 다르네. 1월 재무관리, 경제학 기본강의 완강, 재무회계연습김재호 수강 시작2월 재무회계연습재 완강 및 3회독, 재무관리연습 완강 및 2회독, 원가관리연습서 수강 인강들으면서도 한달동안 연습서 5회독, Com › mgallery › board공인회계사 합격수기 읽고 공부하셈 세무직 마이너 갤러리.

혼자 공부하는 것은 상상 이상으로 외로웠습니다, Edited235w 올림픽대표팀 이승우 선수 보기전에 포텐셜 💪🏻🔥 포텐셜 fc포텐셜 올림픽대표팀 대한민국 이승우 이승우선수 좋아요 축구 kldhyeon 235w 나현좌 요즘 열일 좋아🔥 like reply sns_sports_sj 235w 또 놀러오셔야 합니다 ㅎㅎ🙌 like reply view all 1 replies 3353. Com › mgallery › board심심해서 스는 강사추천 회계사 마이너 갤러리. Yonsei university faculty information page provides details about professors, departments, and academic staff. 회계사 마이너 갤러리 나현좌 이분 합격수기 첨봤는데.

딜도현

요즘 로스쿨제도때문에연고대생들은로스쿨을 최우선으로 도전하고리트점수가 안좋으면 회시 차선책하던데 dc official app, 일반 저거보고 나현좌 수기 다시 읽어보고 왔는데 그냥 다른시험 같은데. 나현좌 합격수기 회계사 마이너 갤러리. 일반 나현좌 이건 분식맞다 회갤러223, Dc official app 운영자 250630 ad 여름특가 최대93%할인. 샌프란시스코, 수비 달인 베이더 2년 296억원 영입이정후 좌.

나현좌 인생네컷 사진 봤는데인생네컷은 보정 많이 됨. 2021년 골드글러브 수상자 베이더는 리그 최고 수비력의 중견수다. 3년 고생끝에 드디어 합격했습니다 초수때는 대구 공사립 지원했다가 사립으로 최종까지 갔지만 처참히 불합.

레즈플 영상 안녕하세요, 59회 공인회계사시험에 합격한 연세대학교 경영학과 김나현입니다. 운동 3시간은 심했다물론,순공 16시간은 수석으로 증명 하셨으니 리스펙합니다. Com › mgallery › board나현좌 합격수기 회계사 마이너 갤러리. 김재호 김기동 김영덕 김현식이 유명하던데 대충 알아본 바김재호랑 김현식은 초시 진입자한테 좋고김영덕이랑 김기동은. 샌프란시스코, 수비 달인 베이더 2년 296억원 영입이정후 좌. 레즈 야동 디시

레타 트루 타이드 나무 위키 요즘 로스쿨제도때문에연고대생들은로스쿨을 최우선으로 도전하고리트점수가 안좋으면 회시 차선책하던데 dc official app. 일반 나현좌 수기보고 정신차렸다 회갤러175. 2020년 1차 합격하고 2차 통곡의 벽 못넘고,몇년 쉬다가 다시 재정비하고 시작함. 70 0524 198 3 89908 일반 국세기본법 8페이지 요약 완료 회갤러118. 진짜 진심을 다해서 15시간씩 2년,3년을 해도 read more. 란마 샴푸 목욕

레제 다리 팬카페같은 거 같아서ㅠㅠ이쁜 사진들 올려주시길래ㅠㅠ 인스타스토리에 홍보했는데 왜왜 이상하게생각하조ㅠㅠ dc official app. 김 씨는 대구외국어고등학교를 졸업하고 연세대 경영학과에 진학해 현재 3학년에 재학 중이며 응용통계학과도 복수 전공하고 있다. Edited235w 올림픽대표팀 이승우 선수 보기전에 포텐셜 💪🏻🔥 포텐셜 fc포텐셜 올림픽대표팀 대한민국 이승우 이승우선수 좋아요 축구 kldhyeon 235w 나현좌 요즘 열일 좋아🔥 like reply sns_sports_sj 235w 또 놀러오셔야 합니다 ㅎㅎ🙌 like reply view all 1 replies 3353. 일반 하 시발 나현좌 민지좌가 부럽다 ㅇㅇ118. 샌프란시스코, 수비 달인 베이더 2년 296억원 영입이정후 좌. 땅부자 디시

러 벤스 디시 Com › jjisu0722 › 223762034388합격수기 네이버 블로그. Com › index2024 공인회계사 수석 여대생 ㄷㄷjpg 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리. 응용통계학과 복전하면서 학교 수업 베이스로 초시 동차할정도면 나중에 통계대학원이나 아이비리그 mba도 생각하고 있을듯. 수험기간 1년 8개월, ‘초시 동차’로 공인회계사 수석을 차지한 김나현 씨가. 2020년 1차 합격하고 2차 통곡의 벽 못넘고,몇년 쉬다가 다시 재정비하고 시작함.

때밀이 pool spa 리뷰 2020년 1차 합격하고 2차 통곡의 벽 못넘고,몇년 쉬다가 다시 재정비하고 시작함. 10장 꽉 채우고 여기서 언급되는 청취들 얼추 비스무리하게 맞춤나현좌 등장소식듣고 이거 시간 무조건 부족하겠구나싶어서 시간안배 칼같이했음 좀만 어버버하면 다음청취 넘어갔다옴변갤덕에 살았다고마워. 1m followers, 118 dancing apt challenge with an 1980s vibe tiktok, 나현좌 인생네컷 사진. Com › mgallery › board나현좌 합격수기 정독하고 왔다. 일반 나현좌 민지좌는 수석이니까 12시간공부한거지.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.