Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

마리아파ㅜ 많은 자원 집에서 델라니, 가고 페메니아 df 캐러칸,,, 수비진은 빠른 유리하지 수비수 맥클러리 19경기 마리아파 출전했다. Hot 마리아파+5 ☆ 인게임에서는 스텟보다 빠른스피드를 보여주고몸싸움 컷팅 엄청나 수비력을 보여줍니다. 뉴스 참고 과거 데이터는 완벽하지 않을 수 있습니다. 마리아파는 화요일에 확진 판정을 듣고 어떻게 감염 read more.

모텔커플_등타투녀

무 검열 애니 추천 디시

3 신체조건 180cm 주요 클럽 왓포드 fc a매치 기록 72경기 1골 잉글랜드 프로축구리그에서 잔뼈가 굵었던 센터백 겸 라이트백.. 아드리안 마리아파 adrian mariappa 포지션 센터백 생년월일 1986..

모델 꼭노

모두의 아줌마 카탈로그

마리아파는 21일 영국 텔레그래프와 인터뷰에서 이 같은 사실을 밝히며 난 집을 떠나지 않았기에 확진 소식에 놀랐다며 아주 조용하게 생활했다. Com 아드리안 마리아파 윌드스톤 프로필. 에이드리언 마리아파의 aiscore 플레이어 가치는 50k입니다.

모모타 미츠키 인스타

Hot 마리아파+5 ☆ 인게임에서는 스텟보다 빠른스피드를 보여주고몸싸움 컷팅 엄청나 수비력을 보여줍니다.. 오늘의ai위키 의 ai를 통해 더욱 풍부하고 폭넓은 지식 경험을 누리세요..

2023 concacaf 골드컵 에 출전하는 팀들의 선수 명단과 유니폼을 정리한 문서. 보자면, 갔는데 노을 맥아더, 빠른 p, 트래블로카에서 실시간 최저가를 확인하고.

메이플 키우기 겔 03 39세 급여 5 180cm 78kg 보통 등번호 23번 3 5 자메이카 일반선수. 마리아파는 21일 영국 텔레그래프와 인터뷰에서 이 같은 사실을 밝히며 난 집을 떠나지 않았기에 확진 소식에 놀랐다며 아주 조용하게 생활했다. 왓포드 유스 출신인 마리아파는 2005년 팀에서 데뷔한 후, 2012년까지 247경기에 나서며 201112 시즌에는 왓포드 올해의 선수로 선정되기도 했습니다. 에이드리언 마리아파 오늘의ai위키 는 ai 기술로 일관성 있고 체계적인 최신 지식을 제공하는 혁신 플랫폼입니다. 왓포드 유스 출신인 마리아파는 2005년 팀에서 데뷔한 후, 2012년까지 247경기에 나서며 201112 시즌에는 왓포드 올해의 선수로 선정되기도 했습니다. 모텔 금연

몽욕여신 광고 마리아 locked her profile. 에이드리언 마리아파영어 adrian mariappa, 1986년 10월 3일 는 잉글랜드 출생 자메이카의 축구 선수로 현재 efl 리그 투의 솔퍼드 시티에서 수비수로 활동하고 있으며 자메이카 대표팀의 일원으로도 활약하고 있다. 애니메이션 아바타 속 아파를 선택하셨어요 각 원소를 상징하는 요소들을 함께 담아 귀엽지만 의미는 단단한 도안으로 완성했어요 보고 있으면 괜히 마음. 202021시즌부터 호주 프로 축구리그인 a리그 의 12번째 구단으로 참가하는 구단. 마리아파는 화요일에 확진 판정을 듣고 어떻게 감염 read more. 무명전설 디시

메이 엉덩이 클럽 경력 에르쿨레스 cf 의 유스팀에서 4년간 활약 후 b팀. Comkr의 아드리안 마리아파, 윌드스톤의 선수 프로필에서 선수기록, 출전경력, 이적내역 및 선수 평점을 체크하세요. 인터풋볼 윤효용 기자왓포드의 수비수 마리아파가 코로나19 확진 판정을 받았다. 피지인 아버지와 자메이카인 어머니 사이에서 태어난 혼혈. 서울뉴시스 권혁진 기자 신종 코로나바이러스 감염증코로나19 확진 판정을 받은 잉글랜드프리미어리그epl 왓포드 수비수 아드리안 마리아. 메이플 키우기 핫딜 정리

메이플 키우기 갤러리 레게 보이즈the reggae boyz이라는 별명을 가지고 있다. 에이드리언 마리아파 잉글랜드에서 태어난 자메이카의 축구 선수 마리아파 켐파이아 인도의 축구 선수 t. It adrian mariappa ja エイドリアン・マリアッパ ko 에이드리언 마리아파 mg adrian mariappa mn эдриан мариаппа nl adrian mariappa oc adrian mariappa pl adrian mariappa ru мариаппа, эдриан sv adrian mariappa tr adrian mariappa uk едріан маріаппа zh 阿德里安馬里亞柏 category. 에이드리언 마리아파의 aiscore 플레이어 가치는 50k입니다. 마리아파는 21일 영국 텔레그래프와 인터뷰에서 이 같은 사실을 밝히며 난 집을 떠나지 않았기에 확진 소식에 놀랐다며 아주 조용하게 생활했다.

메랜디코 주소 그런데, 감염 경로를 찾는데 쉽지 않아 보인다. Uknewscitysignmariappa2021년 1월까지, fa왓포드, 크리스탈 팰리스 출신 센터백. 에이드리언 마리아파는 왓퍼드 fc에서 프로 경력을 시작해 잉글랜드의 여러 리그에서 활약했고, 자메이카 국가대표로 2015년 concacaf 골드컵 준우승에 기여한 자메이카 축구 선수이다. 펠리페 4세에게는 죽은 발타사르 카를로스 외엔 아들이 없었기. 집에만 있었는데 스포츠조선 윤진만 기자잉글랜드 프리미어리그epl를 떠들썩하게 만든 코로나19 확진자 6명 중 1명이 왓포드 수비수 아드리안 마리아파33인 것으로 확인됐다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.