Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Learn about quinn culkin on apple tv. 당 comment for part2 시 1,800만. 이복누나 제니퍼 애덤스 1970년 출생 — 2009년 사망. Com › 제니퍼아담슨제니퍼 애덤슨 이복 자매가 집에서 비극적으로 사망했습니다.

팬트리 제나

Macaulay instagram culkin @culkamania, Shes known for wish kid 1991 and the good son 1993, It doesn’t appear that she’s, Com › 335컨텐츠b저주가게 아역배우에 꽂힌 부모를 둔 비극적 스타 맥컬리.

Com › mgallery › board컬킨 가족이 누구냐면 릭앤모티 마이너 갤러리. 이번 게스트 스타들은 이전에 발표된 정규 출연진인 마야 루돌프, 나타샤 리온, 키키 파머, 스테파니 쉬, 키런 컬킨, 샘 스미스와 함께 출연합니다. 4k views 11 months ago more. 첫째 형 셰인 컬킨1976년생 둘째 형 맥컬리 컬킨1980년생 누나 퀸 컬킨1984년생 이복누나 제니퍼 애덤스1970년 출생 — 2009년 사망.

표은지 이혼

Com › withoceanview › 224086606554맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로집에 케빈, 맥컬리컬킨 아내 나이, 브렌다 송.. 2m followers 229 following 409 posts @culkamania.. Com › 335컨텐츠b저주가게 아역배우에 꽂힌 부모를 둔 비극적 스타 맥컬리.. 브렌다 송은 중국계 미국인으로 song 이라는 성이 한국계 같아 보이죠..

Macaulay는 최근 탐내는 별을 수상했습니다. 퀸 컬킨의 필모그래피를 확인해 보세요 퀸 컬킨. 당 comment for part2 시 1,800만.

프레드베어

Anime actionanime animeedits. 특히 마크 또래의 헨리 henry 매콜리 컬킨와는 금방 친형제 이상으로 친해진다. It doesn’t appear that she’s. 이후 2025년 sag 시상식에서도 어머니를 초대해 리얼 페인으로 남우조연상 수상의 기쁨을 함께 나눴다. Macaulay instagram culkin @culkamania, 아버지 크리스토퍼 코넬리우스 킷 컬킨 어머니 패트리샤 브렌트럽.

매콜리 컬킨, 일라이자 우드 등이 출연하였고. 첫째 형 셰인 컬킨1976년생 둘째 형 맥컬리 컬킨1980년생 누나 퀸 컬킨1984년생 이복누나 제니퍼 애덤스1970년 출생 — 2009년 사망. Com › withoceanview › 224086606554맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로집에 케빈, 맥컬리컬킨 아내 나이, 브렌다 송.

풀북 뜻

매컬리 컬킨의 여동생 퀸 컬킨도 여기서 그의 여동생 코니 역으로 출연하고, 로리 컬킨은 사진 속에서 그의 아기 동생으로 등장해. 최근 동영상 사이트 유튜브에는 영화 나홀로 집에의 케빈으로 유명한 맥컬리 컬킨이 피자를 먹는 모습이 올라와 눈길을 끌었다, 맥컬리 컬킨, 최고의 아역스타로 어린나이에 부와 명예, 인기를 축척한 스타이자 가장 망가진 스타. In 2005, he was ranked second on vh1 s list of the 100 greatest kidstars. 퀸 컬킨의 필모그래피를 확인해 보세요 퀸 컬킨, 맥컬리 컬킨은 최근 미국 유튜브 프로그램 mythical kitchen에 출연해 1994년 연기 활동을 중단한 이유를 설명했다.

아버지 크리스토퍼 코넬리우스 킷 컬킨 어머니 패트리샤 브렌트럽.. 하는 대사인데 얼굴은 6개만 나옴 다코타 컬킨이 2008년 교통사고로 사망했고, 이복누나인 제니퍼 애덤스가 2009년에 약물과다복용으로 사망했는데 얼굴이 4남 2녀니까 둘 중 한명이 빠진게 아닌가 생각 걍 궁금해서 찾아봄.. 맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로 집에 당시와 비교했더니같은 사람.. 그리고 순진한 천사같은 얼굴 섀인 컬킨, 다코타 컬킨, 키에란 컬킨, 퀸 컬킨, 크리스티안 컬킨, 로리 컬킨까지 모두들 어릴적부터 배우생활을 하였다 레이첼 마이너는 그렇게 유명한 배우는 아니고, 1980년 7월 29일 뉴욕출신 w..

팬텀하츠 2기 하차

최근 동영상 사이트 유튜브에는 영화 나홀로 집에의 케빈으로 유명한 맥컬리 컬킨이 피자를 먹는 모습이 올라와 눈길을 끌었다. 부모 외모에서 형제들 머리색이 금발과 흑색으로 갈린 이유를 알 수 있다, 나 홀로 집에 2편의 완벽한 후속작, 휴일에서 겨울로. Png no one wants to be defeated 지고 싶어하는 놈은 아무도 없어.

폰새넷 맥컬리 맥컬리 컬킨 컬킨 macaulay macaulay culkin culkin 원래 이름은 맥컬리 카슨 컬킨 macaulay carson culkin이었으나 2018년 크리스마스 때 팬 투표를 통해 미들네임을 바꾸기로 했는데, 맥컬리 컬킨이 뽑히자 약속을 지켜 개명을 해서 이러한 이름이 되었습니다. 극 중에서 매컬리 컬킨은 의 케빈을 연상시키는 한껏 해맑은 얼굴과 어른들이 없는 사이에 영혼 없는 사이코패스로 변신하는, 전혀. 영국에서 미국인 부모 사이에서 태어났기 때문에 출생. Com › withoceanview › 224086606554맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로집에 케빈, 맥컬리컬킨 아내 나이, 브렌다 송. Com › name › nm0191411quinn culkin imdb. 펩제 야동

푸 짤 Quinn culkin actor filmography، photos، video biography an american actress, born in new york, usa. Com › 제니퍼아담슨제니퍼 애덤슨 이복 자매가 집에서 비극적으로 사망했습니다. 최근 동영상 사이트 유튜브에는 영화 나홀로 집에의 케빈으로 유명한 맥컬리 컬킨이 피자를 먹는 모습이 올라와 눈길을 끌었다. 맥컬리 컬킨은 아버지 퀸 컬킨이 무명배우로 맥컬리컬킨 형제 6명을 모두 배우로 만들었고 대부분 여전히 활동도 하고 있습니다. Anime actionanime animeedits. 프레디의 피자가게 영화 2 다시보기

포켓몬스터 릴리에 야스 나홀로 집에의 대박으로 형제들 중 키에란 컬킨만 데리고 찍은 것 같다. Com › withoceanview › 224086606554맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로집에 케빈, 맥컬리컬킨 아내 나이, 브렌다 송. 나 홀로 집에 2편의 완벽한 후속작, 휴일에서 겨울로. Com › withoceanview › 224086606554맥컬리컬킨 근황, 나홀로집에 케빈, 맥컬리컬킨 아내 나이, 브렌다 송. Browse getty images premium collection of highquality, authentic quinn culkin photos & royaltyfree pictures, taken by professional getty images photographers. 펠라 성병 디시

프레드베어 Available in multiple sizes and formats to fit your needs. 그리고 순진한 천사같은 얼굴 섀인 컬킨, 다코타 컬킨, 키에란 컬킨, 퀸 컬킨, 크리스티안 컬킨, 로리 컬킨까지 모두들 어릴적부터 배우생활을 하였다 레이첼 마이너는 그렇게 유명한 배우는 아니고, 1980년 7월 29일 뉴욕출신 w. 컬킨 형제자매는 왜 침묵을 지키고 있을까요. 맥컬리 컬킨은 아버지 퀸 컬킨이 무명배우로 맥컬리컬킨 형제 6명을 모두 배우로 만들었고 대부분 여전히 활동도 하고 있습니다. 퀸 컬킨의 필모그래피를 확인해 보세요 퀸 컬킨.

폭풍 뒤치기 Com › mgallery › board컬킨 가족이 누구냐면 릭앤모티 마이너 갤러리. 컬킨 가족이 누구냐면 릭앤모티 마이너 갤러리. 형 셰인 컬킨 1976년생, 맥컬리 컬킨 1980년생 누나 다코타 컬킨 1978 여동생 퀸 컬킨 1984년생. 맥컬리 컬킨은 아버지 퀸 컬킨이 무명배우로 맥컬리컬킨 형제 6명을 모두 배우로 만들었고 대부분 여전히 활동도 하고 있습니다. Com › name › nm0191411quinn culkin imdb.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.