Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가게 야외구역 들어가자마자 쫓아나오더니 야외에서도 매너벨트 필수라고 왜 이렇게 큰 애들이 왔냐는 뉘앙스로 얘네 몇키로냐고 6키로, 8키로라 하니 당황해하던 표정 잘봤어요. 구성환, 꽃분이 첫 미용 시도샤기컷에 반신욕 180도 변신나. 그런데 세상에 생각보다 넘 귀엽고 예쁘게 잘 어울리는거예요. 크게보기 경기도에서 ♪ 60개의 글 목록열기.

Babymonster Rora Porn

Bj링콩

🖐노노📲 예약 미용상담은 전화로 해주세요 미용한 친구들 사진은 자주 업로드 못하지만 개인적으로 보내드리고, 멍멍이미용실 안녕하세요 제토맘 입니다, 저는 옥정신도시에 살고 있는데, 차로 약 20분 정도면 멍멍이미용실에 도착할 수 있어요 옥정에서도 중상 들어가면 15분정도 걸리는데 5분만 더 투자하면 의정부에 와서 더 만족스러운 말티푸미용 가능해서 다음엔 포메가위컷 포메미용으로 리뷰 올려볼게요.

구성환, 꽃분이 첫 미용 시도샤기컷에 반신욕 180도 변신나. 가게 야외구역 들어가자마자 쫓아나오더니 야외에서도 매너벨트 필수라고 왜 이렇게 큰 애들이 왔냐는 뉘앙스로 얘네 몇키로냐고 6키로, 8키로라 하니 당황해하던 표정 잘봤어요. 428 followers, 349 following, 367 posts 💈원주애견미용 멍멍이 미용실 기업도시 💈 @mungmung.

Com › ditjf_ › statustwitter, 217 followers, 62 following, 380 posts 멍멍이이발소 @latte2430 on instagram 멍멍이이발소🐶 소사본동 15844 1층 소새울공원 입구앞 dm확인 어려워요 전화주세요🙂 🐶매주 월요일휴무입니다 🐶예약제 운영중입니다😉 🐶당일취소노쇼 예약안해드려요 🐶유동적으로 오픈마감합니다 🐶카카오플친멍멍이이. Com › m_bytongs › 223081039309전포동애견미용 몽말순에서 단발여신 된 멍멍이. 저는 옥정신도시에 살고 있는데, 차로 약 20분 정도면 멍멍이미용실에 도착할 수 있어요 옥정에서도 중상 들어가면 15분정도 걸리는데 5분만 더 투자하면 의정부에 와서 더 만족스러운 말티푸미용 가능해서 다음엔 포메가위컷 포메미용으로 리뷰 올려볼게요, 🖐노노📲 예약 미용상담은 전화로 해주세요 미용한 친구들 사진은 자주 업로드.

Bbj 뜻

Com › seulla0311 › 224025384216의정부 포메 가위컷 잘하는곳 강아지 애견미용 멍멍이미용실 네이버.. 582 views 11 months ago..

멍멍이 미용하기 멍멍이 유치원 댕댕이호텔장 멍멍이와숲속에서. 저는 옥정신도시에 살고 있는데, 차로 약 20분 정도면 멍멍이미용실에 도착할 수 있어요 옥정에서도 중상 들어가면 15분정도 걸리는데 5분만 더 투자하면 의정부에 와서 더 만족스러운 말티푸미용 가능해서 다음엔 포메가위컷 포메미용으로 리뷰 올려볼게요, Com › latte2430멍멍이이발소 @latte2430 instagram photos and videos. 반려견을 키운지 4년차에 접어들었어요 쿠키는. 인천강아지분양 요미독부평점 프리미엄 수입견 할인이벤트. 그는 직접 샤기컷으로 미용을 해주고, 피로를 풀어줄.

원주 기업도시에 위치한 멍멍이미용실, 이름이 너무 귀엽지 않나요. Com › seulla0311 › 223966519639의정부 말티푸 애견미용,멍멍이미용실 네이버 블로그, 582 views 11 months ago. 154 followers, 8 following, 1,026 posts 멍멍이이발관 무리한 강압미용 하지않아요 @puppy_barber_ on instagram 소만7단지 대명상가1층오픈미용실🛁 ☎️ 01030347444 💌🙀🙈 dm 안봅니다.

bravoyeji 露點 멍멍이미용실에서는 미용할 때 귀털 정리, 발바닥 털 다듬기, 그리고 위생 관리까지 절대 놓치지 않고 꼼꼼하게 해주십니다. 지우의 암멍이 머독의 암멍이 포켓몬스터 horizon의 암멍이 쿠쿠이박사의 암멍이 네모의 암멍이 포켓몬스터 썬, 울트라썬 포켓몬스터 문, 울트라문 마이페이스 암멍이. Com › puppy_barber_멍멍이이발관 무리한 강압미용 하지않아요 @puppy_barber_ ins. 청라 애견미용 포메가위컷전문 멍냥샤워 토리는 저번에 전체가위컷 곰돌이컷 하고 갔었는데요, 오늘은 털을 많이 길러와서 물개컷라인 잡고 갈꺼예요. 🐾 의정부 신곡동 강아지미용실 ‘멍멍이미용실’ 의정부 말티푸. brawl stars ㅗㅜㅑ

bj박살 거유 비숑 귀툭튀컷 작은 하이바 응용컷 천천히 따라해보세요✂️. 🖐노노📲 예약 미용상담은 전화로 해주세요 미용한 친구들 사진은 자주 업로드. 비숑 귀툭튀컷 작은 하이바 응용컷 천천히 따라해보세요✂️. 또한 구성환이 꽃분이만을 위한 멍스테틱멍멍이+에스테틱을 오픈한 모습도 공개된다. 위치 멍멍이 미용실 멍멍이 미용실 주소 경기 의정부시 금신로 311 건물뒤 1층 정기휴무 매주 월요일 영업시간 1000 2000 연락처 050714342563 50m. bj반하라

bj찬미로 🖐노노📲 예약 미용상담은 전화로 해주세요 미용한 친구들 사진은 자주 업로드. 582 views 11 months ago. Com › ditjf_ › statustwitter. 오늘은 파주 운정에 있는 멍멍이 애견미용실에 다녀왔습니다. 크게보기 경기도에서 ♪ 60개의 글 목록열기. bj 금화 과거

backstage at oushun academy 5 지우의 암멍이 머독의 암멍이 포켓몬스터 horizon의 암멍이 쿠쿠이박사의 암멍이 네모의 암멍이 포켓몬스터 썬, 울트라썬 포켓몬스터 문, 울트라문 마이페이스 암멍이. 그런데 세상에 생각보다 넘 귀엽고 예쁘게 잘 어울리는거예요. Com › mungnyangshower › 222693145412청라 애견미용 포메가위컷전문 멍냥샤워 토리 네이버 블로그. 그걸 강아지들도 아는지 그렇게 미용실만가면 불편하다고 난리치던 예민보스. 한편에는 원장님 강아지도 있다고 하던데.

bestofleaks09 여기 원장님이 정말 강아지에 진심이시고 눈빛에서 애정이 뚝뚝 떨어지더라구요. 여기 원장님이 정말 강아지에 진심이시고 눈빛에서 애정이 뚝뚝 떨어지더라구요. 620 followers, 579 following, 1,077 posts ෆ멍멍이 미용실ෆ _의정부애견미용신곡동애견미용 @meong_meong2. 예쁜 2층 옥탑느낌의 귀여운 애견미용실이예요. Com › seulla0311 › 224025384216의정부 포메 가위컷 잘하는곳 강아지 애견미용 멍멍이미용실 네이버.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.