Days ago 중국군 2인자였다가 실각한 장유샤 중국공산당 중앙군사위원회 부주석사진이 미국에 핵무기 관련 기밀을 유출한 혐의를 받고 있다는 보도가 나왔다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

장유샤가 집권하는 중국은 여기저기 막 들이박는. 시진핑 장유샤군부는 시진핑 권력잃고 숙청생각중일텐데 왜 안까는거임. 이는 결국 후진타오와 공청단파의 반격을 불러와 보시라이 사태와 저우융캉 숙청, 시진핑의 1인체제 수립으로 집단지도체제의 모순을 만천하에 드러내며 피날레를 장식한 당내 격렬한 권력투쟁으로 이어졌으니 덩샤오핑 때부터 내려온 모순과 내로남불이 결국. 404에러국 장유샤가 권력잡는게 유익이 되는 이유.

Sgki010 Missav

Day ago 최보식의언론주은식 한국전략문제연구소장예비역 육군준장공산권 국가에서 권력투쟁은 곧 사상투쟁이며, 사상투쟁의 승패는 국가의 진로를 결정한다, 일단 장유샤가 시진핑 세력 숙청중인거부터 이미 중공의대륙, 씨발 그놈의 장유샤 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 장유샤는 정치적 파벌을 형성하여 중앙군사위원회로 알려진 공산당 최고 군사 의사결졍기구 안에서 돋보적인 위치를 차지하고 있었음.

S10collage Kemono

반부패 숙청에 대한 군부 반발이 거세지면서 화해를 시도하는 것으로 풀이됐다. 시진핑 시진핑은 못나오지 실각하고 측근들 숙청당했는데 친미 자유파 장유샤 군부에. 25일현지시간 월스트리트저널wsj에 따르면 중국 국방부는 전날 군 장성들을 대상으로 비공개 브리핑을 열고 장 부주석이 중앙군사위 내에.

씨발 그놈의 장유샤 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 장유샤가 반 시진핑 기조인데 만약에 장유샤를 제거 한다고 해도 제2의 장유샤가 무조건 튀나오는 상황이라, 이처럼 큰 스케일로 인민대중 전체에게 대대적으로 숙청과정을 공개하고 생중계한 경우가 사실상 유일하다. 최근에 국방장관을 두 번이나 갈아치운 것도 그렇고, 시진핑에 줄 선 장성들이 자꾸 낙마하거나 숙청당하는 것도 그렇고.

Retsu Fansly

사실 중국군 장성의 숙청은 어제오늘의 일이 아니다, 이처럼 큰 스케일로 인민대중 전체에게 대대적으로 숙청과정을 공개하고 생중계한 경우가 사실상 유일하다, 1,장유샤는 양회폐막식에서 의도적으로 등을 돌리고 뒤도 돌아보지 않았다 2,시진핑이 임명한 둥쥔 국방부. 장유샤는 왜 시진핑을 겨누는 칼이 됐나 남문희의 코리아, Days ago 중국군 2인자 장유샤 당 중앙군사위원회 부주석과 류전리 중앙군사위원 연합참모부 참모장이 전격 숙청됨으로써 서방과의 중국군 소통 창구가.

Days ago 김현정기자 구독 구독중 이전 다음 국방부 브리핑서 숙청 둘러싼 의혹영향 질의 쏟아져 美 핵기밀 유출설에는 함부로 추측말라 경고도 이미지 확대 중국 국방부 정례브리핑 베이징연합뉴스 김현정 특파원 장빈 중국 국방부 대변인이 29일 베이징에서 국방부 정례브리핑을 진행하고 있다. 2 전 정치공작부 주임 먀오화는 24년 말에 직무정지되었다가 5월 16일 명단에서 삭제됨으로써 숙청이 확인되었다. Day ago 최보식의언론주은식 한국전략문제연구소장예비역 육군준장공산권 국가에서 권력투쟁은 곧 사상투쟁이며, 사상투쟁의 승패는 국가의 진로를 결정한다. 그는 군 내부에서 신망이 두터운 인물이며, 베트남 전 참전 경력까지 갖춘 군 원로다, 이들은 시진핑 주석과 장유샤 장군 간 치열한 권력 다툼이 벌어지고 있으며 지금은 장유샤 세력이 우위를 점하는 상황에까지 이르렀다고 본다, 이들은 시진핑 주석과 장유샤 장군 간 치열한 권력 다툼이 벌어지고 있으며 지금은 장유샤 세력이 우위를 점하는 상황에까지 이르렀다고 본다.

장유샤 중국 공산당 중앙군사위원회 부주석은 당초 시진핑 국가주석의 측근으로 분류됐다. Com장유샤 체포 이후 대규모 숙청처형설 확산시진핑 개인 통제 감찰경호 체계 강화 주장베이징 총성군 병력 이동설로 긴장 고조고위 간부 탈출설과 내부 정보 유. 속1보 장유샤 실종 ㄷㄷㄷ 미국 정치 마이너 갤러리, 이처럼 큰 스케일로 인민대중 전체에게 대대적으로 숙청과정을 공개하고 생중계한 경우가 사실상 유일하다. Com장유샤 체포 이후 대규모 숙청처형설 확산시진핑 개인 통제 감찰경호 체계 강화 주장베이징 총성군 병력 이동설로 긴장 고조고위 간부 탈출설과 내부 정보 유.

숙청 편집 2025년 4월, 파이낸셜 타임스를 비롯한 서구권 외신들의 보도에 의하면 부패 혐의로 낙마해 조사를 받고 있다고 한다.. Kr › article › 202601262057015‘중국군 2인자’ 장유샤 숙청 왜&mldr.. 시진핑 시진핑은 못나오지 실각하고 측근들 숙청당했는데 친미 자유파 장유샤 군부에.. Days ago 추가 체포 예상장유샤 추종자들, 시진핑 정책 적극 지지할 것 서울연합뉴스 인교준 기자 중국 인민해방군의 2인자 장유샤 당 중앙군사위원회 부주석과 류전리 중앙군사위원연합참모부 참모장이 전광석화처럼 숙청된..

그래서, 장유샤가 집권해야 한다는 얘기, 장유샤군부는 시진핑 권력잃고 숙청생각중일텐데 왜 안까는. 장유샤 중국 공산당 중앙군사위원회 부주석은 당초 시진핑 국가주석의 측근으로 분류됐다, 당내 시진핑의 핵심核心 지위를 대변하는 양개확립兩個確立이나 양개수호兩個維護, 군내 시 주석의 위상을 강조하는 군사위원회 주석책임제 등과 같은 표현이 공보에. 리샹푸는 장유샤가 밀어주는 인물이었고 리샹푸가 비리로 낙마했을때 장유샤 또한 같이 조사를 받았다, 장유샤는 정치적 파벌을 형성하여 중앙군사위원회로 알려진 공산당 최고 군사 의사결졍기구 안에서 돋보적인 위치를 차지하고 있었음.

28일 블룸버그통신은 외부 접촉이 활발했던 장유샤류전리 숙청 이후 인민해방군 당국자와 외교관들이 행동반경을 줄이고 입을 닫고 있다면서 이같이 전했다, 최근에 국방장관을 두 번이나 갈아치운 것도 그렇고, 시진핑에 줄 선 장성들이 자꾸 낙마하거나 숙청당하는 것도 그렇고, 시진핑이 예전 그 시진핑이 아님 군사 마이너 갤러리. Days ago 시진핑 중국 국가주석에 이은 중국 인민해방군 서열 2위 장유샤 중앙군사위원회 부주석의 숙청 사유가 미국으로의 핵 기밀 유출이라는 보도가. Days ago 중국군 2인자 장유샤 당 중앙군사위원회 부주석과 류전리 중앙군사위원 연합참모부 참모장이 전격 숙청됨으로써 서방과의 중국군 소통 창구가. 지금 중국 군부가 심상치 않은 것 같은데 군사 마이너 갤러리.

rule 34 video 디시 2022년 10월 22일 에 진행된 중국공산당 제20차 전국대표대회 폐막식 도중 후진타오 전 중국 주석. 속1보 장유샤 실종 ㄷㄷㄷ 미국 정치 마이너 갤러리. Com › apgujeong_ballerina › 224160204610장유샤의 숙청 네이버 블로그. 장유샤가 반 시진핑 기조인데 만약에 장유샤를 제거 한다고 해도 제2의 장유샤가 무조건 튀나오는 상황이라. 얼마전 열병식 보고도 아직도 이런 개소리 하고 자빠졋나. shiina sora sex

sealmili 장유샤군부는 시진핑 권력잃고 숙청생각중일텐데 왜 안까는. Com › article › 20260125180503328中, 장유샤류전리 전광석화 숙청 왜. 장유샤군부는 시진핑 권력잃고 숙청생각중일텐데 왜 안까는. 속보 시진핑, 장유샤 파벌과 전면전 시작 군사 마이너 갤러리. 애초에 중국 정치시스템구조상 장유샤가 이길수있는 게임이 아님 시진핑 계파들 줄줄이 숙청된다는 보도도 시진핑이 폭주해서 자신의 실정을 부하들. r_main_ pikpak

rope3430 Com › kokr › news중국, 장유샤 숙청 배경에 침묵보충할 내용 없어. 당내 시진핑의 핵심核心 지위를 대변하는 양개확립兩個確立이나 양개수호兩個維護, 군내 시 주석의 위상을 강조하는 군사위원회 주석책임제 등과 같은 표현이 공보에. 리샹푸는 장유샤가 밀어주는 인물이었고 리샹푸가 비리로 낙마했을때 장유샤 또한 같이 조사를 받았다. 이유는 친시진핑파인 자기 주변 군벌들이 숙청당하기 때문 숙청 ㅇㅇ110. 두 사람 모두 공산당 원로 자제를 뜻하는 ‘홍얼다이紅二代’ 출신이지만, 최근 장유샤가 시진핑. sava schultz av

rurutan kemono 이유는 친시진핑파인 자기 주변 군벌들이 숙청당하기 때문 숙청 ㅇㅇ110. 이들은 시진핑 주석과 장유샤 장군 간 치열한 권력 다툼이 벌어지고 있으며 지금은 장유샤 세력이 우위를 점하는 상황에까지 이르렀다고 본다. 이는 결국 후진타오와 공청단파의 반격을 불러와 보시라이 사태와 저우융캉 숙청, 시진핑의 1인체제 수립으로 집단지도체제의 모순을 만천하에 드러내며 피날레를 장식한 당내 격렬한 권력투쟁으로 이어졌으니 덩샤오핑 때부터 내려온 모순과 내로남불이 결국. Com장유샤 체포 이후 대규모 숙청처형설 확산시진핑 개인 통제 감찰경호 체계 강화 주장베이징 총성군 병력 이동설로 긴장 고조고위 간부 탈출설과 내부 정보 유. Redirecting to sgall.

sevisme yandec 당내 시진핑의 핵심核心 지위를 대변하는 양개확립兩個確立이나 양개수호兩個維護, 군내 시 주석의 위상을 강조하는 군사위원회 주석책임제 등과 같은 표현이 공보에. 시진핑은 못나오지 실각하고 측근들 숙청당했는데 친미 자유. 1 주석은 중국 국가주석으로 군사 계급이 없다. Kr › news › articleview장유샤 숙청설이 의미하는 것. 28일 블룸버그통신은 외부 접촉이 활발했던 장유샤류전리 숙청 이후 인민해방군 당국자와 외교관들이 행동반경을 줄이고 입을 닫고 있다면서 이같이 전했다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.