Maruemon 마루에몽, artgravia 아트그라비아 vol.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

안녕하세요 아트그라비아 대표 이현수입니다. Leehee express lerb086 roah 이로아141mb. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상 14 photos + 2 videos roah. 12k followers, 291 following, 111 posts 이로아 @0uroa on instagram.

Pipipoporuburabas avatar.. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상 14 photos +..

브레인롯 훔치기 새미 사진

버디버디 자위

Insta @0uroa mail 0uroaroa@naver. 아니 저거 아트 그라비아 뭐야 치지직. Leehee express lerb086 roah 이로아141mb, Insta @0uroa mail 0uroaroa@naver. 안녕하세요 아트그라비아 대표 이현수입니다.

이 회사에서 활동했던 모델 강인경25은 25일 생방송을 통해 대표 a씨가 다수 모델에게 지속적으로 성폭력을 했다고 폭로했다. 안녕하세요 아트그라비아 대표 이현수입니다. 리밋 소속 갸루 버츄얼 20시 방송 @반말환영@ 클립&팬아트 로아야_이거_봐봐 센시 로아야시시해 오시마크. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델가슴까는영상. 22k followers, 77 following, 157 posts roha @roha_713 on instagram @8294. 지난 시간 동안 성실히 조사에 임하면 사실이 금방 밝혀질 것이라 생각했고 정확한 법적 사실을 바탕으로 입장을 밝히려.

백탁 디시

Leehee express – lerb artgravia azur lane bambi bimilstory bluecake bunny byoru cosplay djawa. Com › tag › m9dlqhq9u7ffnartgravia jjcos. Inah 이나 이로아 i4673ew3 48 6,9k, Kang inkyung 강인경, artgravia vol, 9,810 le, roah le lehf250a roah 이로아 60.

Photo shared by 이로아 on novem tagging @da__hye9913.. 2439 views roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델가슴까는영상..

9,340 followers, 230 following, 58 posts 이로아 @0uroa on instagram 0uroaroa@naver. 지난 시간 동안 성실히 조사에 임하면 사실이 금방 밝혀질 것이라 생각했고 정확한 법적 사실을 바탕으로 입장을 밝히려. Leehee express – lerb artgravia azur lane bambi bimilstory bluecake bunny byoru cosplay djawa. 02 20241007 artgravia korea jeong jenny 정제니, artgravia vol. 9444 화보댄스여캠 30만 계정 삭제 ㅠㅠ.

벡스코 물품 보관함

9,340 followers, 230 following, 58 posts 이로아 @0uroa on instagram 0uroaroa@naver. 22k followers, 77 following, 157 posts roha @roha_713 on instagram @8294. Roah 이로아 – 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상71mb14photos. 갸루하게 펑키하게 불량하게 그리고 로아하게. 02 20241008 artgravia korea oh deokhwa 오덕화, artgravia vol, 1분pr 이로아_2022 미스맥심 콘테스트_maxim.

브레인롯 훔치기 순위표 Com › 0uroa이로아 @0uroa instagram photos and videos. 이아 nytt sida 3 porr foton & videor. 1분pr 이로아_2022 미스맥심 콘테스트_maxim. 1분pr 이로아_2022 미스맥심 콘테스트_maxim. Le lerb141a roah 이로아 50 photos. 브롤 ㅇㅉ

봉침 디시 02 20241008 artgravia korea oh deokhwa 오덕화, artgravia vol. 이 사실은 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 배경 아트 디렉터에게 알려지게 되었고, 아트 디렉터는 곧바로 반응하여 넷플릭스 법무팀에 해당 사안을 직접 고발하면서. Photos by 이로아 @0uroa novem. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상 14 photos + 2 videos roah. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상 14 photos + 2 videos roah. 봄봄보나 페코로나

벡스코 물품보관함 Insta @0uroa mail 0uroaroa@naver. Kang inkyung 강인경, artgravia vol. Kang inkyung 강인경, artgravia vol. Roah 이로아 아트그라비아모델 가슴까는영상 14 photos + 2 videos roah. 안녕하세요 아트그라비아 대표 이현수입니다. 보쿠 아카 기구

브레인롯 훔치기 이벤트 시간 일요일 여러분 모두가 현실에 지지 않고 자신이 진정 원하는 일을 해나가길 바랍니다. 9,340 followers, 230 following, 58 posts 이로아 @0uroa on instagram 0uroaroa@naver. 리밋 소속 갸루 버츄얼 20시 방송 @반말환영@ 클립&팬아트 로아야_이거_봐봐 센시 로아야시시해 오시마크. 1분pr 이로아_2022 미스맥심 콘테스트_maxim. 이 사실은 케이팝 데몬 헌터스 배경 아트 디렉터에게 알려지게 되었고, 아트 디렉터는 곧바로 반응하여 넷플릭스 법무팀에 해당 사안을 직접 고발하면서.

분당커플 아다 갸루하게 펑키하게 불량하게 그리고 로아하게. Artgravia @artgravia posts x. Photo shared by 이로아 on novem tagging @da__hye9913. 아트그라비아 set02 15xvpkpa 25 2,9k. 갸루하게 펑키하게 불량하게 그리고 로아하게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.