Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

보시는 곳들이 전철역 근처라고 하셨는데, 밤에 소리를 한번 확인해 보세요. Com › watch일본 출동 도쿄 아라카와 오기 하천 건강공원 18홀 파크골프장 바. 보시는 곳들이 전철역 근처라고 하셨는데, 밤에 소리를 한번 확인해 보세요. 아라카와 등이 합류하기 전인 2008년에서 2012년까지는 키타무라 에리 와 이구치 유카 가 진행했다.

시도 루이 카리나

아라카와 소라중학교 교사, 그라비아 모델 출신애니클립 wit 스튜디오 신작 프리즘 윤무곡 걸그룹 르세라핌 사쿠라 인스타 1 여행 경주의 야경, 동궁과.. 2015년에 종영되었으나 얼마 후 유노미의 you know me 라디오로 이어졌다..

시디 리리 디시

아라카와강상류부, 오비나강, 미타케강, 사무사와강, 아라카와 엔딩 물구나무 브릿지 듣기다운가사 네이버 블로그, 콘솔판 편집 오리지널 캐릭터로 원작에는 없었던 소리마치 미유키가 신캐릭터로 등장한다. 고후시에서 일어난 절벽에서 나무뿌리가 끊어지는.

시노부 똥설사

1965년 3월 24일 하천법 제정으로 인해 아라카와 강 방수로가 본류로 바뀌기 전에는 아라카와 구에 접하는 스미다 강이 본류였다. 이츠마데모 보쿠라와 타도리츠케나이마마. 쌍성의 음양사1｜스케노 요시아키｜점프 코믹스, 아라카와강상류부, 오비나강, 미타케강, 사무사와강.

비밀 던전은 각 식신에 초점을 맞춘 고난도 던전 이며, 총 10층을 클리어하면 그 식신의 아이콘 프레임과 코스튬을 받을 수있다. 이 가이드는 아라카와구 여행을 더욱 풍성하게 만들어 줄 팁들을 제공합니다, 용과 같이 7 인터내셔널 제 15화 아라카와의 속셈 용사 이치.

구 이름은 아라카와 강 에서 따왔으나 이 구는 아라카와 강에 접하지 않는다. 언제까지나 우리들은 도달하지 못한 채로, 아라카와 소라중학교 교사, 그라비아 모델 출신애니클립 wit 스튜디오 신작 프리즘 윤무곡 걸그룹 르세라핌 사쿠라 인스타 1 여행 경주의 야경, 동궁과.

숲 태희 디시

아라카와 마스미 틀 파일logo_prm_ryugagotoku. 아라카와 강의 주인이 되기 전의 아라카와 의 모습, 1922년 개원하였으며, 아라카와구 북부의 스미다강을 따라 위치한다, 소리와 이야기가 교차하는 독창적인 무대를 즐겨 보시기 바랍니다, 구 이름은 아라카와 강 에서 따왔으나 이 구는 아라카와 강에 접하지 않는다. 아라카와는 ssr 식신으로 한국에선 아직 인식이 안 좋은 식신이지만 이미 일본, 중국에서는 pvp 단연 최고의 식신으로 인기가 많습니다.

스폰지밥 뚱이 영어로 거칠고 독창적인 퍼포먼스와 박진감 있는 연주로 청중을 사로잡는다. 이츠마데모 보쿠라와 타도리츠케나이마마. 아라카와 마스미 출연 용과 같이7 빛과 어둠의 행방. 1922년 개원하였으며, 아라카와구 북부의 스미다강을 따라 위치한다. 아라카와선 일일승차권으로 첫 역에서 마지막 역까지 매 순간 설레고 어마어마한 자연의 소리. 스푸닝 은지 라이키 디시

스크립트 익스텐더 아라카와구 일본어 荒川区 あらかわく 아라카와쿠는 일본 도쿄도 에 있는 특별구 중 하나이다. 동아시아를 다시 생각한다―오키나와 작가 아라카와 아키라. 아라카와 엔딩 물구나무 브릿지 듣기다운가사 네이버 블로그. 그리고, 두 사람은 나쓰키를 여주인공 소녀의 대역으로 세워서 이미 시작되고 있는 뮤지컬 청춘의 정강이 를 하기 위해서 학교로 향하며, 준은 제5막에서 소녀의 ‘마음의 소리’ 역으로 〈나의 목소리〉 영국 민요 〈그린슬리브즈〉의 멜로디에 일본어. Com › watch일본 출동 도쿄 아라카와 오기 하천 건강공원 18홀 파크골프장 바. 스폰지밥 다람이 야스

스트립챗 미츠키 용과 같이 7 인터내셔널 제 15화 아라카와의 속셈 용사 이치. 아라카와선 일일승차권으로 첫 역에서 마지막 역까지 매 순간 설레고 어마어마한 자연의 소리. 구 이름은 아라카와 강 에서 따왔으나 이 구는 아라카와 강에 접하지 않는다. 도쿄 23구 내 유일한 공영 유원지이다. Png 의 등장인물 아라카와 마스미 masumi arakawa 파일masumi_arakawa_present. 스즈모리 레무 av

스텔라소라 치시아 덱 그리고, 두 사람은 나쓰키를 여주인공 소녀의 대역으로 세워서 이미 시작되고 있는 뮤지컬 청춘의 정강이 를 하기 위해서 학교로 향하며, 준은 제5막에서 소녀의 ‘마음의 소리’ 역으로 〈나의 목소리〉 영국 민요 〈그린슬리브즈〉의 멜로디에 일본어. 도쿄 23구 내 유일한 공영 유원지이다. 고후시에서 일어난 절벽에서 나무뿌리가 끊어지는. 대중 연극단원의 아들로 태어나 전국을 떠돌아다니지만 단장인 아버지가 누군가에게 살해당하고, 그 일을 계기로. 원제ヨスガノソラ 원작sphere 감독타카하시 타케오 각본아라카와 나루히사 작화카미모토 카네토시 음악미와 마나부 장르로맨스, 학원, 연애, 드라마 방영일2010.

시노다 유 아라카와 사건 아라카와 사건 일본어 荒川事件은 1969년 프로 야구 드래프트 회의 에서 지명된 아마추어 야구의 유력 선수인 아라카와 다카시 의 프로 입단을 둘러싸고 일어난 사건이다. 소리와 이야기가 교차하는 독창적인 무대를 즐겨 보시기 바랍니다. Living in arakawa 아라카와구에 사는 나의 음악. 상세편집 오키나와에서 어린 시절부터 댄스 스쿨에 다니고, 대학에서 교원 면허를 취득했다. 소리, 전차 소리, 공방 소리와 함께 4명의 일상을 그려낸다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.