Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

杜牧（公元803－约852年），字牧之，号樊川居士，汉族，京兆万年（今陕西西安）人，唐代诗人。 杜牧人称小杜，以别于杜甫。 与李商隐并称小李杜。 因晚年居长安南樊川别墅，故后世称杜樊川，著有《樊川文集》。. 牧清人 また少ない小遣いで頑張ってレポします. 最终决战的战场上，辅元清的选择震惊了所有人。 当三尊跨界古神碾压己方阵营，连秦牧都束手无策时，这个一直被视为 反派 的角色，做出了最决绝的决定 —— 强修《无漏造化玄经》，以自身为容器，融合万种剧毒，重塑血肉骨骼。. Medicalonlinee provides medical professionals with comprehensive access to the largest fulltext database of medical journals in japan.

애니 레온하트 거인

안소희 야동

杜牧（公元803－约852年），字牧之，号樊川居士，汉族，京兆万年（今陕西西安）人，唐代诗人。 杜牧人称小杜，以别于杜甫。 与李商隐并称小李杜。 因晚年居长安南樊川别墅，故后世称杜樊川，著有《樊川文集》。.. 3710013 前橋市 西片貝町 12123.. Com › zhcn › articles牧野清人 wikiwand.. Jp › crid › 1390001204844458368突発性難聴のウイルス学的検討 cinii research..

앙밍망 구독자전용 디시

알렉사 데미 참여 영화 및 tv 프로그램 Jp › crid › 1390001204844458368突発性難聴のウイルス学的検討 cinii research. 00 three cases of central dysphagia given glottic choke technique toru wakabayashi, 牧清人, haruyo tsukada, yoshito yasuoka 1. Medicalonlinee provides medical professionals with comprehensive access to the largest fulltext database of medical journals in japan. 牧清人 日本語も達者で会話は楽しめて、優しく仕事で話してるといった感じもない 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！ 牧清人 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！. 「牧 清人」で探す新築一戸建て・中古一戸建て・中古マンション. 야마가타 유흥

야동 어린상사 2013年04月20日掲載牧 清 人前橋市医師会監修. 清极盛时除去對外戰爭暫時佔領的地區，實質控制下的領土達1310万平方公里，在中國歷史上僅次於 元朝，即使在清末也維持1130萬平方公里。 政局穩定、新作物傳入與賦稅制度的改變，使得中國人口突破以往的平均值，達到四億餘。. 戰國武將簡傳連載－（0470） 牧清冬（1545～1583） 統：84 武：87 智：78 政：41 三浦家臣，幸松，菅兵衛，尚春之孫，高田城攻略戰活躍，為家中軍事領袖，多田山之戰夜襲大破宇喜多軍，後擊破伊賀久隆的加茂眾，主家滅亡後侍奉宇喜多氏。. 2025年5月12日更新cinii dissertations及びcinii booksのcinii researchへの統合について cinii research自動翻訳機能（試行版）をcinii labsにて公開しました 日経bp社提供データの更新停止及び削除について 「研究データ」「根拠データ」の収録について. 3710013 前橋市 西片貝町 12123. 암웨이 트리플 다이아몬드

야동 hamster 民眾申請放租國有耕地需要檢附哪些證件？ 1140526. Org › wiki › 清朝清朝 维基百科，自由的百科全书. 其父名苏提婆，母名提婆吉。黑天降生于雅德夫族，肤色黝黑，像天上的乌云。幼时是顽皮出众的牧童，屡行神迹，灭除恶魔。青年时是风流的牧牛人，用迷人的笛声勾引 read more. Jp › crid › 1390001204844458368突発性難聴のウイルス学的検討 cinii research. 不滿日本統治的琉球人流亡清朝（被稱為脫 清人），以福州、天津、京師三地為據點，要求清朝進行交涉。 琉球士族聯合抵制日本的縣政，拒絕出任日本官職，平民也拒絕接受日本的賑災。 而在另一方面，不少琉球貧民前往日本謀生。 戰爭與人間 電影. 애니멀 딜도 디시

안젤리 캉 참여 영화 この作品 「牧清『人肌恋しい季節っす』」 は 「漫画」「牧清」 等のタグがつけられた「めるば」さんの漫画です。 「牧清（牧→←←←←清）です！. 2025年5月12日更新cinii dissertations及びcinii booksのcinii researchへの統合について cinii research自動翻訳機能（試行版）をcinii labsにて公開しました 日経bp社提供データの更新停止及び削除について 「研究データ」「根拠データ」の収録について. 不滿日本統治的琉球人流亡清朝（被稱為脫 清人），以福州、天津、京師三地為據點，要求清朝進行交涉。 琉球士族聯合抵制日本的縣政，拒絕出任日本官職，平民也拒絕接受日本的賑災。 而在另一方面，不少琉球貧民前往日本謀生。 戰爭與人間 電影. 仙清儿是一个引子，引发秦牧与佛像的交锋、矛盾爆发。 佛像固执地以一种似乎合乎自然的方式获取心中认为或佛经上所言的功德，但秦牧不以为然，他是在坚守内心，无关乎是否顺应自然万物，若自然形成冰潮，就劈开，这也是秦牧一直坚持的。. 牧清人 日本語も達者で会話は楽しめて、優しく仕事で話してるといった感じもない 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！ 牧清人 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！.

야구 여왕 갤러리 申請承租國有耕地者，應填具申請書，檢附身分證明文件、土地登記謄本、地籍圖謄本及每戶承租面積未逾國有耕地放租實施辦法第7條第1項規定面積上限（5公頃）切結書（位於山坡地 read more. 他也曾於1989年起兼任錦江紀念禮拜堂堂主任及2004年於梁發紀念禮拜堂事奉；2005年於香港基督教聯合醫院任院牧；2007年4月起，出任基督教文藝出版社社長，直至現在。 「我看見 read more. 牧清人 日本語も達者で会話は楽しめて、優しく仕事で話してるといった感じもない 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！ 牧清人 「タイ感」強で素朴でカワイイ！. 袁枚追求的不是人对自然的主宰，而是人与自然的和谐及由此产生的自然之趣、闲适之情。 他多用拟人手法，赋予自然景物以生命的灵性，寻觅自然中的生气与生趣。 这是袁枚为推动清代山水诗的发展所作出的重要贡献 19。. Com › zhcn › articles牧野清人 wikiwand.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.