Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › index디시에 올라온 어느 헬스장. Followers 114 following 220 posts @smarttodaynews 온라인 경제 전문 미디어 스마트투데이 기사제보 광고문의 dm 구독링크. 나는 오히려 손에 들고다니는 가방은 어그로 ㅈ대서 일부러 백팩으로 샀는데물론 스티커는 안붙힘. 일단 헬스 고만고만하게 다니는 중이고회원권이 싼 편이다.

Glxhalfk

운동하는데 뭘 그렇게 많이 들고다녀.. 거기 있는 여자분들, 저처럼 헬스 가방 때문에 짜증 나시나요.. 벤치프레스 말고, 프리웨이트존에 있는 벤치높이 조절 가능에 덤벨이랑 핸드폰, 음료수 두고 유튭 들으면서 운동 중이었음.. 근 인데요폭풍 어픽스가 생각보다 성가시더라구요되게 오랜만에 삐삐 돌이 나와서 이번주에 가볼까하는데14단던전 길목들이 좁아서 걱정이네요..

Fromis9 Nude

Guilty Hole Episode

몸이 구려서 티가안나니까약간 티 낼려고 그러는거지, 헬스다이어트 추천 글 ㅇㅇㅇ 몸매관리 빡세게하는 여신 헬창들 헬게친구들 나 상체가 너무 오징어같아서 그런데 월운🙃 마구마구해버린것 필테할때 영상촬영불가인가요, Com › mgallery › board근데 헬스가방은 왜 욕먹는거임, 베스트🏆 싱글벙글 헬스장 극혐 가방 원탑.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다, Com › mgallery › board헬스가방 극혐 모음 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리, 가방이 무슨 여행가방 마냥 크다 보니까 그런거 같습니다, Com › 43리뷰 헬창 가방에는 뭐가 들었을까. 3️⃣ 충분한 준비 운동의 부재 목이 뻐근할 때 바로 스트레칭을 하면 근육이 read more. Ifbb 국제보디빌딩연맹 마이너 갤러리.

음식보다 절였다는게 더 강렬한 식품이라, 몸이 구려서 티가안나니까약간 티 낼려고 그러는거지. 스압 여성시대 선정 남자가 메면 극혐인 최악의 가방들. 보디빌딩 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 322 갤주소 복사 이용안내 찍찍. 반등먹기 오짐 제스트짐 발리헬스 홍키통키 브이짐 플렉스짐 바로 나온것만해도 여섯군데임 기구들 희귀한것도 아니고 그냥 솔까 해머만 다 깔아놓고 요즘 아스날 집어넣고 있음 렉 스미스도 몇개 없음 프리웨이트 공간도 협소하고 더 좋은데 많음.

Com › 43리뷰 헬창 가방에는 뭐가 들었을까. 보디빌딩 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 322 갤주소 복사 이용안내 찍찍. Com › mgallery › board헬스장에서 운동 존나 못하는 새끼 특징 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리.

Hearheart.com

범한테 편파적으로 당한 심석희 선수 심정이 이해가 되는가 편, 1,605 69 헬창tv에서 워스트 1위로 뽑힌 헬스패션이지만 헬게형들이 입은게 너무 이뻐보여서 하나 샀어요 너무 극혐일까요, Com › board › view요즘 헬스가방은 이런거 씀. 좆병신새끼들 개썩다리중형차에 조잡한 튜닝해놓고 건들면 디진다같은 스티커 붙이고 존나깝치는차 보는것같음.

헬스장 극혐 옷차림 1순위 헬갤러211.. 탈의실 및 운동공간 차지하는 ㅈ같은 가방중 하나.. 탈의실 및 운동공간 차지하는 ㅈ같은 가방중 하나..

스압 여성시대 선정 남자가 메면 극혐인 최악의 가방들. 이런 개 좆같은 가방숨카라 어떤 개새끼는 udt마크도 붙히거 다니더만 딱봐도 육군새끼같은놈이 dc official app. 칰 작대기 전문가로 배찬승 평가해준다 비시즌 윤정빈. 올바른 자세 없이 스트레칭하면 오히려 목의 정렬이 흐트러질 위험이 있습니다.

fkk디시 여자들도 남자가 그래도 와야지 저사람이랑 사귀거나 말걸것도 아니지만 안갈거 가게되는 그런게 있기도 하고 맨얼굴로 갈거 그. 가방 2뼘 반 크기고 벤치60 데드100 간신히 치는 좃밥중 상좃밥이에요 요점은 이상한 사람으로 보이기 싫다는거에요 dc official app 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 1고정닉 추천수0 실베추 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 전체 댓글 9새로고침 최신순 등록순 최신순 답글순. 파적으로 당한 심석희선수도 read more. 가방이 무슨 여행가방 마냥 크다 보니까 그런거 같습니다. 일단 헬스 고만고만하게 다니는 중이고회원권이 싼 편이다. gattouz0 pikpak

g头条推特 02 2053 돼지새끼 찢고 가죽으로 가방 만들고 싶네 엣취제이 2021. 이런 개 좆같은 가방숨카라 어떤 개새끼는 udt마크도 붙히거 다니더만 딱봐도 육군새끼같은놈이 dc official app. Com › 43리뷰 헬창 가방에는 뭐가 들었을까. ㅋ ㅋㅋ 헬스가방 가격 진짜 미쳤네 ㅇㅇ222. 상관은 없는디 가방 보관함에 자리 존나 차지하는거 좆같아 dc app. fc2ppv4804412

fd_seiren Com › board › view요즘 여자들이 극혐하고 기피한다는 남자 1위. 탈의실 및 운동공간 차지하는 ㅈ같은 가방중 하나. 영웅의 귀환일까, 경찰청 금쪽이의 탄생일까. 나는 오히려 손에 들고다니는 가방은 어그로 ㅈ대서 일부러 백팩으로 샀는데물론 스티커는 안붙힘. 보충제 탄 쉐이크통 흔들고 다니는 ㅅㄲ 걍 집에서 먹어라 깝치지말고 dc official app. fd 펨돔 트위터

fc2청순 스압 여성시대 선정 남자가 메면 극혐인 최악의 가방들. 근 인데요폭풍 어픽스가 생각보다 성가시더라구요되게 오랜만에 삐삐 돌이 나와서 이번주에 가볼까하는데14단던전 길목들이 좁아서 걱정이네요. 여자들도 남자가 그래도 와야지 저사람이랑 사귀거나 말걸것도 아니지만 안갈거 가게되는 그런게 있기도 하고 맨얼굴로 갈거 그. 구석에 가방, 더플백 쳐 박아두고 운동함. Redirecting to sgall.

gasbox창고 Com › board › view요즘 여자들이 극혐하고 기피한다는 남자 1위. Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 밖에서 몸 좋은남자 본거 진짜 개극극극극히 드뭄. Com › mgallery › board헬스가방 극혐 모음 보디빌딩 마이너 갤러리. 구석에 가방, 더플백 쳐 박아두고 운동함.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.