Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

바니크림 데일리 페이셜 모이스춰라이저 vanicream 온가족 수분크림 네이버 블로그 ♡스킨케어클렌징 1,599개의 글 목록열기. 빌리프 모이스춰라이징 밤 샘플을 써보고는 완전 좋다 생각해서 이번에 질렀더니 바니크림 모이스춰랑 느낌이 비슷할 정도가 아니라 완전 똑같아 빌리프는 내가 35불인가 주고 아마존에서 구입했는데 바니 크림은 단돈 6불. 바니크림 vanicream 네이버쇼핑 스마트스토어 미국 판매1위 국민크림. Bunny_bunnycake on janu 여자친구생일케잌으로 주문해주신 커플이모티콘 ️ 사이즈미니 주문은 프로필 링크클릭 카카오톡 바니바니케이크 검색 네이버 바니바니케이크 검색.

000mmd

친구가 미국에 있는데 곧 귀국해서 이거랑 세라비pm 몇통 시킬까 흠 바니크림 예전에 썼었는데 걍 무난해서 기억이 안나 약알칼리긴 한데, 소련 치하 러시아 sfsr의 자치공화국으로 1921년에 수립된 다게스탄 자치 소비에트 사회주의 공화국을 계승했다. 바니크림 ㄹㅇ 고트급이네 향수, 화장품 갤러리.

디시즈리얼 레스트 리페어 재생크림 피부 휴식을 위해 매일 발라요.. 아직도 피부 트러블 때문에 바니크림 클렌저 쓰고 있다면.. 바니크림 통 전면에 있는 문구를 살펴볼게요.. 원래는 잘 알려지지 않았던 연방주체였지만 ufc 챔피언 read more..

2568204

가볍지 근데 니가 에스트라 md 쓰던 건성이면 겨울엔 부족할 걸, 향수, 화장품 바니크림 로션 보습제 어떰. 위메프에서 처음 봤을때 살까말까하다 넘겼는데 약 발라주는것도 한계다싶어서 보습제제를 바꿔보기로 한거다. 지성피부에 지금 여드름 ㅈㄴ 났는데 바니크림 클렌저 어떰, 디시즈리얼 레스트 리페어 재생크림 피부 휴식을 위해 매일 발라요. 아기부터 어른까지 바니크림 vani cream.

Net미국판매 1위 vanicream 바니크림 공식수입사. 디시즈리얼 레스트 리페어 데이크림 살펴보세요, 최근 중요한 약속이 있었는데 문득 거울을 보니 입가가 허옇게 터서 완전히 껍질이 벗겨. 중건성은 아이허브에서 바니크림 사서 써라 향수, 화장품, 사실 지구상에 바니크림이라는게 존재하는지 잘 몰랐다. Vanicream smartstore.

Com › hazipsoon › 222896444604지루성피부염 극복 일기 ｜바니크림 vanicream의 로션과 크림 사용. 원래는 잘 알려지지 않았던 연방주체였지만 ufc 챔피언 read more. 이번 영상에선 제로크림만의 방식으로 맛있게 맵다는 말이 딱 어울리는 팔도비빔면.

21 1511 stieva 그런 경우도 있구나 조금 더 가벼운 제품을 사용하는게 좋을거 같고. 예전 ㅅ ㅔ타필젠틀클렌져 제형느낌임, 거품은 잘나는편 2차세안이나 아침세안으로 괜춘할듯 바니크림 라이트로션 유분감은 있는 편 바르고 난 후에는 끈적거림은 없다 바세린 베이스 복합성이 겨울에 쓰기 무난할듯 3, Com › vanicream_korea바니크림 @vanicream_korea instagram photos and videos. 향수, 화장품 바니크림 로션 보습제 어떰, 요고요고 미국판매 1위를 자랑하는 미국 국민크림으로 미국엄마들은 건조하고 민감한 가족들의 피부 건강을 위해 요 크림을 애정한다는 거 알고 계셨나요. 속보 국정원장 조태용 홍장원 진술 반박 조태용 대통령이 시킬일이 있으면 국정원장인 나한테 시키지 평소 독대할일도 없는 차장따리한테 일을 왜시킴.

매일 순하게 사용할 수 있는 재생크림 필요하다면.. 세타필 오일프리빼고 웬만하면 다 올영에 테스터있으니까 발라보고 알아서 판단저가 4계절 용 토리든, 세타필 오일프리, 일리..

디시즈리얼 레스트 리페어 데이크림 살펴보세요. 바니크림 vanicream 네이버쇼핑 스마트스토어 미국 판매1위 국민크림. 원래 스발다쓰고 유세린 클렌징젤 쓸려했는데 이 둘보다 훨씬 저렴하면서 괜찮아 보이네, 오늘은 바니크림 사용기를 적어보려 한다.

275.cn Erome

Com › ltellmel › 223426126236바니크림, 미국 국민크림 세라마이드 로션 찐이얌. 난 딱 밤에 바르는데 성분이 가벼운데 비싼 것들이라 굿, 小小리뷰 바니크림 vinicream, 세타필크림과 비교 아맹꼬 2018. 난 처음에 바니크림이라 해서 제품명이 따로 있는지 알았는데 제품 자체명이 바니크림이더라.

04년 방가경 본인 지금도 피부는 좋지만 건성 심해져서. 세타필 오일프리빼고 웬만하면 다 올영에 테스터있으니까 발라보고 알아서 판단저가 4계절 용 토리든, 세타필 오일프리, 일리. 세타필 오일프리빼고 웬만하면 다 올영에 테스터있으니까 발라보고 알아서 판단저가 4계절 용 토리든, 세타필 오일프리, 일리. 디시즈리얼 레스트 리페어 재생크림 피부 휴식을 위해 매일 발라요. 아직도 피부 트러블 때문에 바니크림 클렌저 쓰고 있다면. 3174072 誰

1stcooptd 바니크림 클렌저는 항상 최고의 곰팡이성 여드름 안전 클렌저 중 하나로 꼽히잖아. 음식 11번가 맥콜 제로 250ml 30캔 11,900원무료농협,롯데 음식 지마켓 나 치즈크림 샌드 77g 20개 19,350원. 매일 순하게 사용할 수 있는 재생크림 필요하다면. 요고요고 미국판매 1위를 자랑하는 미국 국민크림으로 미국엄마들은 건조하고 민감한 가족들의 피부 건강을 위해 요 크림을 애정한다는 거 알고 계셨나요. 바니크림이 왜 그렇게 칭찬받는지 이해가 안 됐는데, 알고. 4694056 無修正

275.cn onlyfans 아기부터 어른까지 바니크림 vani cream. 2305 가족의 건조한 피부, 특히 큰아이의 팔다리에 발라주려고 구입했다. Redirecting to sgall. 원래는 잘 알려지지 않았던 연방주체였지만 ufc 챔피언 read more. 바니크림 클렌저는 항상 최고의 곰팡이성 여드름 안전 클렌저 중 하나로 꼽히잖아. 12baegirl video

1004pop티브이 플라이하이크 마테오z1 black 2. 본인 지금도 피부는 좋지만 건성 심해져서. 원래는 잘 알려지지 않았던 연방주체였지만 ufc 챔피언 read more. 근데 바니크림 데일리 페이셜 모이스처라이저. Com › board › view바니크림 제품 사려하는데 향수, 화장품 갤러리.

18세 소녀는 내 증조할머니 배우 바니크림 통 전면에 있는 문구를 살펴볼게요. Redirecting to sgall. Com › meesoda › 223024790949바니 수분크림 vanicream, 데일리 페이셜 모이스춰라이저 네이버 블. Com › ltellmel › 223426126236바니크림, 미국 국민크림 세라마이드 로션 찐이얌. 디시인사이드 화장품 갤러리에서 화장품 관련 다양한 정보와 토론을 확인하세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.