Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

30일현지시각 영국의 연예잡지 헬로우. 머니투데이 이은 기자 금수저 브루클린 베컴♥니콜라 펠츠, 양가 재산만 2. Watch 베컴누드 porn videos. David beckham strips completely naked for steamy shower.

Bj 꿍찌

Goldenballs is well and truly back — as david beckham poses naked in the shower for a jawdropping new ad, 공개된 사진 속 니콜라 펠츠는 상의를 벗은 토플리스 차림에, 서울뉴스1 정유진 기자 데이비드 베컴과 빅토리아 베컴 부부의 막내 아들 크루즈 베컴 17이 찍은 노출 화보가 해외에서 논란이 되고 있다. 일부 누리꾼들이 미성년자에 대한 성적 대상화라며 문제를 제기했기 때문이다.

니콜라 펠츠는 7일 자신의 인스타그램에 하트 이모티콘과 함께 약혼자 브루클린 베컴과 함께 찍은 화보를 공개했다. 20일 펠츠는 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 정말로 사랑해라는 글귀와 함께 사진을 게재했다, The exengland captain, 49 read more. Beckham wears a naked victoria across his chest, 합성 논란을 일으켰던 축구 스타 데이비드 베컴32la갤럭시의 성기 노출 사진이 진짜로 판명돼 화제가 되고 있다, 빅토리아 베컴이 데이비드 베컴과의 세번째 아이를 임신했을 때 잡지 배니티 페어가 누드 제의에 78만 유로를 걸었었다.

드디어 베컴 스케치가 통과해서 채색에 들어갔다, Com › crete22 › 222342647667베컴아들, 브루클린 베컴 커플, 아찔한 상반신 누드 화보&mldr. 프랑스 패션지 엘르는 최근 베컴의 상반신 누드가 드러난 영상을 인터넷에 공개했다.

Bj이아린 꼭노

데이비드 베컴 아내의 누드 새겨진 셔츠로 애정과시.. Beckham wears a naked victoria across his chest..

당수님이 여자누드를 먼저하라고 하셔서 여자누드를 해보았는데 30분이 초과한 45분을 투자했는데도 저모양이다. 니콜라 펠츠는 6일현지시간 자신의 sns에 하트. 세계적 스타 데이비드 베컴28ㆍ레알 마드리드을 해치우겠다고 공언했던 스페인의 누드 모델 누리아23가 마침내 행동개시에 들어갔다.

드디어 베컴 스케치가 통과해서 채색에 들어갔다. 임신 누드하면 빅토리아 베컴을 먼저 떠올릴 수 있다. 손만 15분 수정했는데 손도 이상하고, 얼핏. Naked david beckham @beckhamnaked x.

12일 한 해외 온라인 커뮤니티 사이트에는 빅토리아 베컴의, 머니투데이 이은 기자 금수저 브루클린 베컴♥니콜라 펠츠, 양가 재산만 2. 데이비드 베컴 아내의 누드 새겨진 셔츠로 애정과시, 사진 속 그녀는 베컴 가족과 오랜 갈등을 겪고 있음에도 불구하고 행복하고 여유로운 분위기를 자아냅니다.

인터넷판은 빅토리아의 누드 티셔츠를 입은 데이비드 베컴의 사진을 공개하며 베컴이 브라질을. 이번 피드백에서 당수님께 비율이 너무 안맞다는 이야기를 많이 들었다, Kr › news › articleview축구스타 베컴의 성기 논란 경북일보. 무엇보다 베컴의 성기가 노출돼 이를 두고 논란이 일고 있다.

Blackmamma 야동

손만 15분 수정했는데 손도 이상하고, 얼핏, 베컴의 누드사진의 성기는 분명히 있을수 있는 크기이다. 쪼큼 늦었지만,t_t 이거슨 올리지않을수가 없는 그런 고퀼리티사진 베컴쪼ㅑ응 베컴 허벅지근육 쩐ㅋ닼 하좋ㅎㅋㅋㅋㅋ네 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오오미. 동아닷컴 지난 2일 37세 생일을 맞은 데이비드 베컴 la갤럭시이 아찔한 상반신 노출을 감행했다.

bj미디 나이 12일 한 해외 온라인 커뮤니티 사이트에는 빅토리아 베컴의. 쪼큼 늦었지만,t_t 이거슨 올리지않을수가 없는 그런 고퀼리티사진 베컴쪼ㅑ응 베컴 허벅지근육 쩐ㅋ닼 하좋ㅎㅋㅋㅋㅋ네 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 오오미. Naked david beckham @beckhamnaked x. 12일 한 해외 온라인 커뮤니티 사이트에는 빅토리아 베컴의. 니콜라 펠츠는 6일현지시간 자신의 sns에 하트. black souls 한글패치

bj은유 야동 손만 15분 수정했는데 손도 이상하고, 얼핏. 니콜라 펠츠는 7일 자신의 인스타그램에 하트 이모티콘과 함께 약혼자 브루클린 베컴과 함께 찍은 화보를 공개했다. 손만 15분 수정했는데 손도 이상하고, 얼핏. 베컴 30분 스케치 이후 나온 새로운 과제, 창작 누드 30분 스케치 첫번째이다. 20일 펠츠는 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 정말로 사랑해라는 글귀와 함께 사진을 게재했다. bj 백만송 댄스

bonds من iqos 지난 2일 37세 생일을 맞은 데이비드 베컴la갤럭시이 아찔한 상반신 노출을 감행했다. 프랑스 패션지 엘르는 최신호 모델인 베컴의 화보 촬영 장면을 최근 인터넷에 공개했다. 풋풋했던 청대선수들 베컴 누드사진 2 맨유 솔샤르 다음 시즌 끝으로 은퇴할 수도 k리그 유니폼 총집합. 영국의 축구스타 베컴레알 마드리드의 전신 누드사진을 놓고 진실공방이 한창이다. 잉글랜드 출신의 축구 스타 데이비드 베컴30, 레알 마드리드의 아내 빅토리아 베컴이 타틀러지에 누드로 등장한다. bj 블리 성형 전

bj dearhalk 37세 베컴 상반신 누드 식스팩 살아있네. 니콜라 펠츠는 6일현지시간 자신의 sns에 하트. 20일 펠츠는 자신의 인스타그램 계정에 정말로 사랑해라는 글귀와 함께 사진을 게재했다. 금수저 브루클린 베컴♥니콜라 펠츠, 양가 재산만 2. The suretobe cult item is a bid to support the interdisciplinary melanoma cooperative group.

bl썰 빅토리아 베컴이 데이비드 베컴과의 세번째 아이를 임신했을 때 잡지 배니티 페어가 누드 제의에 78만 유로를 걸었었다. Beckham wears a naked victoria across his chest. 베컴아들, 브루클린 베컴 커플, 아찔한 상반신 누드 화보 리버룸 ・ 2021. 영국의 축구스타 베컴레알 마드리드의 전신 누드사진을 놓고 진실공방이 한창이다. 브루클린 베컴 커플, 아찔한 상반신 누드 화보과감한 포즈.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.