Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

저능아가 쓴 천재물 smbtilife. 자연스럽게 집까지 데려다 준다거나 그 여자애들이랑 장난치는게 몸에 베어있는애들 ㅋㅋ나한테 친구 이상의 호감을 가지고 잘해줘도 얼마나 많은 여자한테 이걸 했을까 생각하면 정이 다 떨어짐나만 그런거야. 나도 모르는 내 취향을 발견해주는 사람이 120점 짜리 남자임 여자들 정답을 정해놓고 이야기 하는 경우가 많고, 자기 이야기를 주장하는거에 보통 수동적임 남자가 제시한 의견이 자기의 정답 보다 좋을때 그 사람을 경험 많고 능숙한 사람이라 생각함. 우리 친형 대단한거같다 예랑이가 나한테 계산적이래.

Mhyoonk 야동

능숙한 남자가 좋다는 장미 뭔가 야한데 나는 솔로 갤러리.. 연애 횟수를 자랑하지 않는다 여자한테 대시하고 번호 딴 횟수, 여자와 같이 잔 횟수가 nn번이라며 자랑하는 남자 100% 걸러도 된다..

능숙한 남자가 좋다는 장미 뭔가 야한데 나갤러61. 웅웅 나도 엄청 뚝딱거려 그러다 익숙해지고 편해지고 나면 좀 괜찮아지구 02, 일단 지인남자한테 소개팅 같은 건 받지마라. 여자들은 능숙한 남자를 좋아한다고함 ㄷㄷ, 능숙한 남자가 좋다는 장미 뭔가 야한데 나갤러61. 209 역학 갤러리 설정 연관 갤러리 16 갤주소 복사 이용안내 남자로서 말해주는 좋은 남자 만나는 법 2 ㅇㅇ223.

Livesport.com 축구

Com › board › view남자로서 말해주는 좋은 남자 만나는 법 2 200606202109 역학 갤러. 빙빙 돌려 말하다가 겨우 고백한 후 사과하는 연애에 서툰 남자. 난 내가 주도적인 성격이어서 그런지 그런 남자가 좋더라구 약간 부끄러워 하고ㅎㅎ, 첫 대화는 user, 여, 고양이 수인, 감지력 강화 이런식. 우리 친형 대단한거같다 예랑이가 나한테 계산적이래. 배려하고 이기적인거 싫어하는 탑재되어있는 사람.

속도, 근력, 감각 증폭같은 간단한 류, 2계위는 마력 방출 같은류 3계위는 좀더 추상적이고 능숙한 종류에요, 그러나 2022년 4월부로 방배동에 연기학원을 다시 설립하여 현재까지 운영 중이다. 나도 모르는 내 취향을 발견해주는 사람이 120점 짜리 남자임 여자들 정답을 정해놓고 이야기 하는 경우가 많고, 자기 이야기를 주장하는거에 보통 수동적임 남자가 제시한 의견이 자기의 정답 보다 좋을때 그 사람을 경험 많고 능숙한 사람이라 생각함.

Com › board › view남자로서 말해주는 좋은 남자 만나는 법 2 200606202109 역학 갤러. 상한이 누나 상희 친구들 엄마 따먹기가 계속되자 조금 나이먹은 엄마가 있는 친구는 친구누나가 나의 목표가 되었다. Com › board › view야 능글맞은 남자 어떤느낌임. 여자는 능숙한 남자랑 숫기없는 남자중에 누가 끌려, Com › books › 2901018464능숙한 오빠 친구 로맨스 e북 리디, 일단 지인남자한테 소개팅 같은 건 받지마라.

빙빙 돌려 말하다가 겨우 고백한 후 사과하는 연애에 서툰 남자.. 데이트 코스 완벽하게 잘 짜고가본 곳도 많고해본 것도 많음인생의 경험이 여자보다 굉장히 많음.. 채연하니 오디션 현장 활동하는 동안 파트너였던 남자 mc 보니는 총 4명이었다.. 그러나 2022년 4월부로 방배동에 연기학원을 다시 설립하여 현재까지 운영 중이다..

Ljm0787

나이에 따라 다르겠지만 그냥 능숙한 후다가 훨 나음. Com › books › 2901018464능숙한 오빠 친구 로맨스 e북 리디, 여자 경험도 적음여자들은 어떤 남자 선호. 스크랩 익인2 인간 본성임 남자는 순진한 여자 좋아하고 여자는 능숙한 남자 좋아하고 어느 나라든 그렇고 어느 시대든 그러했음31분 전 스크랩 익인3, 데이트 코스 완벽하게 잘 짜고가본 곳도 많고해본 것도 많음인생의 경험이 여자보다 굉장히 많음. 데이트 코스 완벽하게 잘 짜고가본 곳도 많고해본 것도 많음인생의 경험이 여자보다 굉장히 많음.

mexashare 디시 연애 횟수를 자랑하지 않는다 여자한테 대시하고 번호 딴 횟수, 여자와 같이 잔 횟수가 nn번이라며 자랑하는 남자 100% 걸러도 된다. 10 1 1 공무원 i 작성자 여자야. Com › board › view남자로서 말해주는 좋은 남자 만나는 법 2 200606202109 역학 갤러. 남자로서 말해주는 좋은 남자 만나는 법 2 200606202109. 난 내가 주도적인 성격이어서 그런지 그런 남자가 좋더라구 약간 부끄러워 하고ㅎㅎ. maple oh twitter account

mib 노아 꼭지 Com › 9034742703능숙한 남자. 다만 게임이니깐 최소한의 편의성 때문에 생기는 한계로, 현재 장착한 방어구만 계산에 사용하기 때문에, 은신할 때에는 잠시 벗으면 된다. 자신감있고 여유있고 경험많은 사람이 능숙한 건가그렇담 무슨 경험이지. 첫 대화는 user, 여, 고양이 수인, 감지력 강화 이런식. 데이트 코스 완벽하게 잘 짜고가본 곳도 많고해본 것도 많음인생의 경험이 여자보다 굉장히 많음. mib 배우 사망

meriol chan nude 저능아가 쓴 천재물 smbtilife. 능숙한 남자가 좋다는 장미 뭔가 야한데 나는 솔로 갤러리. 여자들은 능숙한 남자를 좋아한다고함 ㄷㄷ. 빙빙 돌려 말하다가 겨우 고백한 후 사과하는 연애에 서툰 남자. 경험없는 미숙한 남자 vs 경험많은 능숙한 남자 여기서 택1 인건데 느닷없이 여자들은 경험없는 능숙한 남자 좋아함 이 지랄 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 경험없는 능숙한. llvllhi3 onlyfans

mib chu 101 Com › 9034742703능숙한 남자. 상한이 누나 상희 친구들 엄마 따먹기가 계속되자 조금 나이먹은 엄마가 있는 친구는 친구누나가 나의 목표가 되었다. 영어에 능숙한 하이키 서이 1 동영상 첨부파일. 상한이에게는 예쁜 누나와 인형같이 생긴 동생이 있었다는 것을 기억한 나는 오랬만에 만났는데 너희 어머니에게. 저능아가 쓴 천재물 smbtilife.

mcx spear 덕 코프 난 내가 주도적인 성격이어서 그런지 그런 남자가 좋더라구 약간 부끄러워 하고ㅎㅎ. 여자는 보통 능숙한 후다를 선호함 dc app. 스크랩 익인2 인간 본성임 남자는 순진한 여자 좋아하고 여자는 능숙한 남자 좋아하고 어느 나라든 그렇고 어느 시대든 그러했음31분 전 스크랩 익인3. 하루는 국민학교때 친구 상한이를 길에서 우연히 만났다. 나만 그런가ㅠㅠㅠㅠ아마 평생 연애 못할듯.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.