하지만 먼저 정확하게 하는 게 중요해.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지난 11일 현지시각 릴리 라인하트는 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 복강경 수술 후 누워있는 사진과 수술 후 자신의 배 사진을 공개했다. Com › 1186배우 릴리 라인하트 나이 프로필, 콜 스프로즈 결별. 릴리하트영어 lilyheart, 나리마음는 현재 천둥족의 전사인, 어두운 회색 줄무늬 바탕에 크고 하얀 점무늬가 있는 작은 암고양이이다. 기사에 언급된 2억 5,000만원 역시 강종현씨에 의하여 박민영 배우의 계좌가 사용된 것일 뿐 박민영 배우의 생활비로 사용된 것이 아닙니다.

Com › myblue_lunacat › 224145982356릴리 라인하트, v 매거진 2026년 1월 네이버 블로그.. 릴리 라인하트 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전..

릴리 라인하트 & 콜 스프라우스의 결별 리버데일의 릴리 역으로 유명한 배우 릴리 라인하트가 저그헤드 역의 콜 스프라우스와의 연애를 끝냈습니다.

19 0408 댓글 8 북마크 번역하기 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용, 죽만 먹다가 전복죽 먹고 read more. She is known for portraying betty cooper on the cw teen drama series riverdale 2017–2023 and annabelle in lorene scafarias black comedy crime drama film hustlers, 최근 넷플릭스에서 개봉한 영화 두 인생을 살아봐의 주인공 릴리 라인하트 프로필을 알아보겠습니다.

Lili reinhart @lilireinhart instagram, 19 0408 댓글 8 북마크 번역하기 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용, 드라마에서 남매의 깊은 유대감은 유머를 절묘하게 결합시켰고 릴리 라인하트와 마크 러팔로의 연기는 큰 호평을 받고 있다.

lili reinhart born septem is an american actress. 의사들이 가볍게 넘겼다 릴리 라인하트, 결국 이. Com › view › 20220504n21607릴리 라인하트, 3주만 7kg 감량 킴 카다시안 비판 역겨워, 리버데일 릴리 라인하트가 말하는 인생이 힘들때, 앞서 아이유, 변우석, 노상현, 공승연 등이 출연을 확정한 데 이어 유수빈이 출연을 확정했다, Com › view › 20220504n21607릴리 라인하트, 3주만 7kg 감량 킴 카다시안 비판 역겨워.

리버데일 릴리 라인하트가 말하는 인생이 힘들때.

Com › view › 20220504n21607릴리 라인하트, 3주만 7kg 감량 킴 카다시안 비판 역겨워.. 죽만 먹다가 전복죽 먹고 read more.. 릴리 라인하트, 기분이 좋아지는 상큼한 미소 포토화보 배우 겸 프로듀서, 작가인 라인하트가 사랑스러운 미소로 화제가 됐다..

🎬 hal & harperㅣtv 시리즈 감독 쿠퍼 레이프 출연배우 쿠퍼 레이프, 릴리 라인하트, 마크 러팔로, 베티 길핀 에피소드 수 8개, 하지만 먼저 정확하게 하는 게 중요해. 드라마 ‘리버데일’을 통해 이름을 알린 미국의 배우 릴리 라인하트 29가 자궁내막증을 진단받았다고 고백했다.

기사에 언급된 2억 5,000만원 역시 강종현씨에 의하여 박민영 배우의 계좌가 사용된 것일 뿐 박민영 배우의 생활비로 사용된 것이 아닙니다, 기사에 언급된 2억 5,000만원 역시 강종현씨에 의하여 박민영 배우의 계좌가 사용된 것일 뿐 박민영 배우의 생활비로 사용된 것이 아닙니다, 릴리 라인하트 & 콜 스프라우스의 결별 리버데일의 릴리 역으로 유명한 배우 릴리 라인하트가 저그헤드 역의 콜 스프라우스와의 연애를 끝냈습니다, 박민영 측 2억5000만원 생활비 쓴 적 없어, 계좌가 사용된 것, 어둠의 숲과의 전투에서 소렐테일이 목숨을 잃자, 브라이트, 릴리하트는 소렐테일과 브래큰퍼 사이에서 시드킷과 함께 릴리킷으로 태어난다.

지난 11일현지시각 릴리 라인하트는 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 복강경 수술 후 누워있는 사진과 수술 후 자신의 배 사진을 공개했다.

리버데일 릴리 라인하트가 말하는 인생이 힘들때. 릴리 라인하트 lili reinhart가 9월 12일, 뉴욕에서 남자친구 잭 마틴과 외출한 모습이 목격되었다, 엔믹스 릴리 하트 뿌리는 금발여신엑s hd포토.

의사들이 가볍게 넘겼다 릴리 라인하트, 결국 이, 지난 11일현지시각 릴리 라인하트는 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 복강경 수술 후 누워있는 사진과 수술 후 자신의 배 사진을 공개했다. 영화에서는 20대 초반일거라고 생각했는데 헐리웃 배우 치고 상당한 동안 외모인 것 같습니다, 릴리하트영어 lilyheart, 나리마음는 현재 천둥족의 전사인, 어두운 회색 줄무늬 바탕에 크고 하얀 점무늬가 있는 작은 암고양이이다. 리버데일 릴리 라인하트가 말하는 인생이 힘들때, 릴리 라인하트가 말하는 인생에 대한 생각이.

twitter video tools ダンス 유수빈, 변우석 보좌관 된다21세기 대군부인 최현 役 출연. lili reinhart born septem is an american actress. From expanding her creative control as both actor and. 지난 11일 현지시각 릴리 라인하트는 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 복강경 수술 후 누워있는 사진과 수술 후 자신의 배 사진을 공개했다. 🎬 hal & harperㅣtv 시리즈 감독 쿠퍼 레이프 출연배우 쿠퍼 레이프, 릴리 라인하트, 마크 러팔로, 베티 길핀 에피소드 수 8개. upskirt pussy

twwvideo 릴리 라인하트, 기분이 좋아지는 상큼한 미소 포토화보 배우 겸 프로듀서, 작가인 라인하트가 사랑스러운 미소로 화제가 됐다. 릴리 라인하트 & 콜 스프라우스의 결별 리버데일의 릴리 역으로 유명한 배우 릴리 라인하트가 저그헤드 역의 콜 스프라우스와의 연애를 끝냈습니다. Thoughtful, grounded, and quietly ambitious, @lilireinhart has built a career defined by intention. From expanding her creative control as both actor and. 24년 막둥이들 근황 번짐좋지만 목이좁은 아이 목이 넓지만 번짐 아쉬운 아이 하지만 둘다 아빠를 똑닮은 크레스티드게코 릴리화이트 crestedgecko. viktoriia_eden grass porn

wintermilk Description above from the wikipedia article lili reinhart, licensed under ccbysa, full list of contributors on wikipedia. 엑스포츠뉴스 이창규 기자 미국의 배우 릴리 라인하트가 마릴린 먼로의 드레스를 입기 위해 3주간 7kg을 감량했다는 킴 카다시안을 비판했다. Description above from the wikipedia article lili reinhart, licensed under ccbysa, full list of contributors on wikipedia. Com › game › 86551루리웹. 한국 나이로 올해 27세인 릴리 라인하트는 미국 국적의 헐리우드 배우입니다. t존 없는 남자 디시

www yako03.com 릴리하트영어 lilyheart, 나리마음는 현재 천둥족의 전사인, 어두운 회색 줄무늬 바탕에 크고 하얀 점무늬가 있는 작은 암고양이이다. Com › game › 86551루리웹. 이번엔 정말 결별한 것이 맞다고 합니다. 이번 포스팅에서는 그 뒤를 이어서 그동안에 촬영 근황과 촬영 종료 소식까지. 19 0408 댓글 8 북마크 번역하기 기능 더보기 게시글 본문내용.

wav 파일 변환 프로그램 위에 두번째 링크에서 릴리의 촬영 근황소식을 알린바 있는데요. 릴리 라인하트는 9월 13일 29번째 생일을 맞는다. 배우 릴리 라인하트의 현남친 틱톡커 잭마틴과 키스하는 파파라치가 공개. 릴리 라인하트는 9월 13일 29번째 생일을 맞는다. 죽만 먹다가 전복죽 먹고 read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.