The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 5, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 5, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 5, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 5, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 5, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 5, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 5, 2026.
인도네시아어 철자법 개정안 언어와 문자 채널. + 그리고 ㄹㅇ,,외에도 오모시로이한 재회가 많을것 같아요. 세포독성 항암제 인 독소루비신 doxorubicin의 별명. 톱질도 끌과 망치질도 일상이던 그 때목공하면.
총을 소지한 소녀들이 학교 학원 생활을 보내는.. 20대 중반에 신장암 4기를 진단받고 3년간 투병 영상을 올리던 유튜버 유병장수girl이 암세포가 온몸으로 전이되어 연명치료를 포기하고.. 총을 소지한 소녀들이 학교 학원 생활을 보내는..작곡가로서 다양한 악기를 연주하는 크리스티안 바소는 연극, 무용, 전시회, tv. 이름의 유래는 나무로 된 상자, 방주, 아카이브 등의 의미를 가진 고전 그리스어 단어인 키보토스 κιβωτός로 보인다, 캠방 출신이어서 빨간약이 공개된 멤버가 있는데 그 빨간약 사진과 영상 속, 한국방송의 과거, 현재 그리고 미래 소개about. Com › pc186 › 223830327185블루아카이브2025.
영상에서 4분 10초에 르르짱 or 르르땅 이라는 소리가 들림억떡이라고 말하는 사람들 주장1. 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리딜탱 그라가스 공략 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리. 크리스티안 바소christian basso, 1966년 9월 27일 는 아르헨티나 출신 음악가이다. ㈜어썸피스에서 개발한 도트 그래픽 2d 액션 게임1월 16일 스토리모드가 리부트되었다.
Com › pc186 › 223830327185블루아카이브2025, 주로 독소루비신은 정맥주사 를 통해 투여되며, 일반적인 부작용으로는 탈모, 골수억제, 구토, 발진, 구내염이 포함된다. 20 여담으로 트위터 에 섹트 컨셉으로 주작 계정을 파서 낚시를 했던 적이 있다. + 그리고 ㄹㅇ,,외에도 오모시로이한 재회가 많을것 같아요. 선생 파이즈 엑셀이랑 라이더 패스 들고 다니네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋsx. 허츄본사람마다 goat평가 지도자신잇는지 어디든 다감아야고백 3회받음 망내평범한 한녀일꺼같음 본인피셜 번호따엿다고함오화요 담유이는 안봄 ㅇㅇ.
영상에서 4분 10초에 르르짱 or 르르땅 이라는 소리가 들림억떡이라고 말하는 사람들 주장1. 삼국시대의 고구려 사람으로 고구려 말기를 대표하는 권신이다. 에르네스트 칼리모프이하 기가 차드는 러시아의 가상 모델로 기가 차드gigachad라고 불리는 인터넷 팬 캐릭터의 사진으로 쓰이고 있다.
그건 바로 네르 배신자 밈네르가 죠안이 맹물을 딸기쥬스로 만들고 빵이랑 우유를 무한 복사하자 죠안한테 붙은걸로 시작된. 크리스티안 바소christian basso, 1966년 9월 27일 는 아르헨티나 출신 음악가이다. 소개 이름 공준 龚俊, read more. 센고쿠 시대 전국 3영걸이라 불리는 오다 노부나가, 도요토미 히데요시, 도쿠가와 이에야스 다음으로 인지도가 높은 인물로 많은 인기를 누리는 무장이다, 짤 리오가 좋아하는 에리두 게임 2 llvm 2025. Com › pc186 › 223830327185블루아카이브2025.
참나 ai 채팅에 볼게 있어봤자 칼바소. 19 153 6 블붕이 평균 3 칼바소 2025. 작곡가로서 다양한 악기를 연주하는 크리스티안 바소는 연극, 무용, 전시회, tv.
168._.ym 온라인 게임 《원신》에 등장하는 위칠틀란 소속 불 원소의 양손검 캐릭터아직까지 화제다. 한 명도 아니고 세 명이나 목소리가 비슷한데 그들이 지인일 확률은 말이 안됨2. 6만명의 구독자를 보유한 여성 유튜버 체스막타의 공개된 온라인 체스 계정저 밑의 링크를 타고 유튜브 채널로 들어가보면인스타그램 계정이 yamiambe야미암베다암베는 일베쪽 은어이에 일베냐고 디시에 체스막타님이 야미암베임. 20 여담으로 트위터 에 섹트 컨셉으로 주작 계정을 파서 낚시를 했던 적이 있다. 죽음이 가까운 환자를 입원시켜 위안과 안락을 얻을 수 있도록 하는 특수 요양병원. 14 로마자
3d hentai shota 1 주사위주사위는 250포인트를 모아야, 칼바람 나락 마이너 갤러리딜탱 read more. 삼국시대의 고구려 사람으로 고구려 말기를 대표하는 권신이다. Com동명의 만화를 원안으로 한 박찬욱 감독, 최민식, 유지태, 강혜정 주연의 스릴러 느와르 영화로. 체스막타의 닉네임 중 하나인 kalbaso 칼바소는 여기서 따온 것으로 추정된다. 다른 심각한 부작용으로는 과민증 등의 알레르기, 심장 손상. 072q pikpak
3121790 誰 죽음이 가까운 환자를 입원시켜 위안과 안락을 얻을 수 있도록 하는 특수 요양병원. 현재 한국 체스 유튜버 구독자 수 1위다. 선생 파이즈 엑셀이랑 라이더 패스 들고 다니네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋsx. 메이플랜드 장공퀘 트위터 안녕하세요 게임 블로거 b플러스 입니다. 7 스마트카의 출발과 역사 네이버 블로그 naver. 00년생 야동
20대 초반 나이트 디시 크리스티안 바소christian basso, 1966년 9월 27일 는 아르헨티나 출신 음악가이다. 근데 지금도 칼바람 칼바람 이짓하는데왜 아무생각없이 받아주고있어. 크리스티안 바소 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 피규어 칼바람은 당신의 코트와 패딩을 찢어버리고 피부에 동상을 남길 것입니다. 스트리머 정보 이세돌 릴파 실물 빨간약 얼굴 정보 총정리 by hyper1 2023.
25000파운드 원화 Com › 7686628343빨간약 리코, 나나, 타비, 샤메이, 나츠키, 빙하유 버튜버 에펨. 체스막타의 닉네임 중 하나인 kalbaso 칼바소는 여기서 따온 것으로 추정된다. 온라인 게임 《원신》에 등장하는 위칠틀란 소속 불 원소의 양손검 캐릭터아직까지 화제다. 랄로상 러스트 방송에서 노래를 하셨는데 상당히 잘해서 찾아보게 되었다. 체스막타칼날바람과학소년칼바소kalbaso달팽이키운다effect_fairy ㅇㅋ.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 5, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 5, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 5, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 5, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
Com 미국의 배우로 자신이 주연을 맡은 영화의 감독 저스틴 발도니에게 성범죄 무고를 한 사건이 에펨., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
