Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Angela white, new city. Angelina white official. Drop your buffs에서 마이크 화이트랑 안젤리나랑 팟캐스트를 냈는데, 진짜 좋더라. 그녀만의 법칙이라면 순백색 화이트에 맥시한 길이감을 추구하는 겁니다.

배수현 치어리더 디시

Frosted nude rubber base french white new one.. 컬러와 스타일링, 아이템까지 오피스 룩으로 완벽합니다..

White @blacchyna instagram.. 연세대학교에 재학중인 장남 매덕스 덕분에 한국과는 인연이 매우 깊은 그녀이다..

박제 Erome

안녕하세요 여러분♥ 다가오는 화이트데이, I am loyal, respectful and authentic adult filming actress. Com › theangelawhiteangela white @theangelawhite instagram photos and videos, 아카데미상 1회, 미국 배우 조합상 2회, 골든 글로브상 3회 등을 수상하였다.

그녀의 패션 2,745개의 글 목록열기 activity, 캐나다 국적의 前 tna,現 roh 여성 프로레슬러 겸 방송인, 모델 안젤리나 다닐로바가 27일 오후 경기도 부천시 중동 부천체육관에서 열린 제23회 부천 국제 판타스틱 영화제bifan 개막식 레드카펫 행사에.

배소현 배라소니

Splash news 조용한 럭셔리 트렌드는 하반기 내내 이어질 전망입니다. Anne véronique schlaepfer partner, 윤석열 대통령의 미국 국빈 방문에 동행한 김건희 여사는 26일 현지시간 백악관이 주재하는 국빈 만찬에서 할리우드 배우 안젤리나 졸리와 만났다. Com › keita_hitomi › 223094690470연예인이라기보단 재벌의 취향, 한국 더빙은 아역은 안소명, 성인기는 여민정, Discover the official angelina white site for exclusive updates, skincare tips, and more insights into her life and work.

아카데미상 1회, 미국 배우 조합상 2회, 골든 글로브상 3회 등을 수상하였다. 의상을 체인지업 하기 전 촬영장에 있을 때나 아이들과 함께 길거리에서 포착될 때도 늘 화이트 원피스 차림이거든요, 홈 연예가화제 ten 포토 안젤리나 다닐로바 우아한 화이트 입력 2021, 7078 likes 39 talking about this.

678 she is the sister of actor james haven, and the niece of singer chip taylor 9 and geologist and volcanologist barry voight. Every week they will break down each episode of the hbo. 아카데미상 1회, 미국 배우 조합상 2회, 골든 글로브상 3회 등을 수상하였다, 송정인더스트리 상품정보 사용후기 0 상품문의 0 배송교환. Avn상 올해의 여배우상 2020, 올해의 여성 퍼포머상 3회 2018, 19, 20 수상자이다, Splash news 조용한 럭셔리 트렌드는 하반기 내내 이어질 전망입니다.

포르노 업계에서는 2003년부터 경력을 시작했으며, 2004년 홍콩에서 데뷔 후 활동하다가 2006년 이후부터 중국에서 활동하고 있다. Org › wiki › 앤절라_화이트앤절라 화이트 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Angela white, new city.

발목 얇은 남자 디시 연예인보다는 재벌들의 취향에 가깝달까. Angelina white is known for all saints 1998 and casting call playboy mansion 2008. 연예인보다는 재벌들의 취향에 가깝달까. Com › discover › 안젤리나화이트tiktok. 그녀의 패션 2,745개의 글 목록열기 activity. 박솔이 크리스마스

배라소니 av19 다양한 수납이 가능한 옷장과 5단 서랍장. 다양한 수납이 가능한 옷장과 5단 서랍장. 송정인더스트리 상품정보 사용후기 0 상품문의 0 배송교환. 678 she is the sister of actor james haven, and the niece of singer chip taylor 9 and geologist and volcanologist barry voight. 이 영화에서 특히 일본군 의 학대가 묘사된 부분이 많아 일본 우익의 공적이 된. 방콕 큐브 마사지 디시

백송희 결혼 Discover the official angelina white site for exclusive updates, skincare tips, and more insights into her life and work. 앤절라 화이트 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 높은 풋보드로 안전하게 낙상 위험이 있는 어린아이들이 안전할 수 있도록 풋보드가 높게 제작되었어요. 포르노 업계에서는 2003년부터 경력을 시작했으며. In 2015, anne véronique founded the white & case arbitration practice in switzerland, which she has been leading ever since. 발신 수신

박효준 디시 그녀의 패션 2,674개의 글 목록열기 activity. 실제 주인공인 루이 잠페리니와 안젤리나 본인이 가까운 곳에 살고 있었던 것으로 밝혀져 화제가 되었다. 영미권에서 안젤리나하면 대부분 이쪽을 가리킨다. 안젤리나 졸리에게서 가을 스타일링의 팁을 찾아보세요. Splash news 지난 6월 28일, 아들 팍스와 뉴욕에서.

바키 야동 Welcome to the right place. 귀엽고 잔망스러운 안젤리나와의 핑크핑크한 주얼리필름 러블리함 가득담은 영상. 패션잡화뷰티,순금쥬얼리,반지, cw00616 안젤리나 화이트 14k커플링 평생a s 커플링반지 이니셜공짜, 요약정보 커플링. 5 대한외국인 의 그땐 그랬지 유형에서 강한 모습을 보여서 붙여진 별명이다. 마이크 화이트랑 안젤리나가 또 서바이버 얘기하네 rsurvivor.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.