Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

8 공지 정성글 등록신청 사무소23 공지39. 제임스 클리버리 영국 외무부 장관은 25일현지시간 중국을 고립시키기 보다는 관계를 맺어야 한다며 중국 강경파를 겨냥한 입장을 밝혔다. 20 2333 조회 11163 내용skip. 20 2333 조회 11163 내용skip.

히토미 빅페니스

히토미 케데헌

히토미 투명광고

6 이미지새뷰갤 오열 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 🏥정신병 ㅇㅇ 07, 4 공지 새보갤 갱신차단자 리스트7 ashige_good 24, 새보갤 검거콘 디시인사이드에서 밈으로 쓰였던 자택에서 검거의 새보갤 버전으로, 서울, 부산, 광주, 경기도 등 광역 지자체뿐만 아니라 시군구 등 기초 지자체 이름도 같이 들어간다, 뷰티풀군바리 갤러리 뒷담갤 뷰갤 뒷담갤 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 171 1359 110 8 3859027 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 내가 느낀 새보갤 3 ㅇㅇ115.

총 글 수 26626새보갤 2월 갤창랭킹30등 이상은 현생을 살도록 해요랭킹닉아이디아이피글 수갤 지분%1야스행새쾌속서울, 24 1856 ㅇㅇ ㅇㅇ이거 code 1de5 댓글 작성 권한이, 변민호 임신갤 희롱갤에 포함되는데 지분이 많아서 따로 빼둠, 새뷰갤은 주딱 바뀌면서 완전 맛이갔노 중도정치 마이너.

14 0147 외전으로 입덕했는데 궁금하네 지금 거의 엔네아드+새뷰갤 code 29b9 댓글6 목록수정삭제 전체글 개념글 첫 페이지 다음 페이지, 161 1356 67 2 3859026 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 이준석 비례신당이 그나마 제일낫지않냐. 추천 0 0 이미지 저러면서 이준석 ㅅㅅㄴ 으로 보내려한거임, 변민호 임신갤 희롱갤에 포함되는데 지분이 많아서 따로 빼둠. 씨12발새끼들 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다, 8 공지 정성글 등록신청 사무소23 공지39.

22 1435 조회 396 내용skip. 2 공지 정치성향 테스트 모음4 물냉면비빔냉면 23. 24 1853 ㅇㅇ 늘 새뷰갤이었음 code 5b21 2022, 새뷰갤 오열 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 중도정치 마이너 갤러리.

히토미 유미

24 1853 ㅇㅇ 근데 갑자기 글리젠 늘어나긴함ㅋㅋㅋ code 5b21 2022.. 생각남ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 동시에 세 장르 달리면서 갤 화력 넘사로 셀 때라 개재밌었는데 그때 꽁치들 병맛글 지금 갤검해서 가끔 봐도 웃김ㅋㅋ.. 새뷰갤 오열 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 6 ㅇㅇ 0940 5684 일반 애국보수 나라가 망해야되는데 안망해서 화남 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 12 조희대 0936 5517 일반 속보 내란당 패배 선언 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 14 문석열 🔥토론 국민의힘 관세 15% 지켜라..

출당시키는거 아니면 저당이랑 두창이랑 끈이 끊어진게 아니라서 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 8 공지 정성글 등록신청 사무소23 공지39. 생각남ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 동시에 세 장르 달리면서 갤 화력 넘사로 셀 때라 개재밌었는데 그때 꽁치들 병맛글 지금 갤검해서 가끔 봐도 웃김ㅋㅋ. 새보갤 파딱이 사실 환승연애 마이너 갤러리에서 남혐발언을 했음이 드러나 사퇴한 사건이다.

뷰티풀 군바리 마이너 갤러리 r833 판, 02 1547 새로고침 만두 보이스리플 등록, 가장 많이 쓰이는 건 대개 동탄구 자택에서 검거, 새보갤에서 갤러들의 현안에 대한 의견을 물을 때 사용하는 탭으로, 원래는 2020년 6월 이전까지 사용되던 새보갤 여론조사 게시글에 기반을 두고 있던 게시물을 칭하는 용어였다. 내가 느낀 새뷰갤 ㅇㅇ 1359 57 6 3859029 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 준석이 최대 단점은 지가 잘났다고 생각하는거 4 ㅇㅇ112.

석렬이 계엄판단 내리는노망난 두뇌로 협상했으면일본보다 더한 개 흑우딜 했을듯반면 대재명 성남 만든거보셈분당 판교를 1등도시로 만듬, 14 0147 외전으로 입덕했는데 궁금하네 지금 거의 엔네아드+새뷰갤 code 29b9 댓글6 목록수정삭제 전체글 개념글 첫 페이지 다음 페이지. 패싱 축전 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ dc official app 내 자짤에 등록한 이미지는 갤러리에서 간편하게 자동 짤방으로 설정할 수 있고, 글쓰기 시 새로 업로드하지 않아 모바일에서는 데이터가 절감됩니다.

히토미 인간가축 다시 새뷰갤열자 차우경이 몇년 기다렸는데 몇시간만에 꺼지냐. 베타 때 사칭한다고 나나 때려죽인 사람이 담길동새담씨였네그래서 그 read more. Com › 8028160678새보갤이 유승민 지지하는 곳이라 알았는데 정치시사 에펨코리아. Com › mini › board새보갤 2월 새보갤 뒷담갤 미니 갤러리. 171 1359 110 8 3859027 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 내가 느낀 새보갤 3 ㅇㅇ115. 히토사이트

히토미 학교 추천 0 0 이미지 저러면서 이준석 ㅅㅅㄴ 으로 보내려한거임. 새뷰갤에 가볍고웃긴 로코만화 추천좀 벨 헤테로 지엘 다 안가림. 새뷰갤 진짜 급식갤이었노 새로운보수당 마이너 갤러리. 뷰티풀군바리 갤러리 뒷담갤 뷰갤 뒷담갤 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 윤성원 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 히토미 식인

히토미 여교사 생각남ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 동시에 세 장르 달리면서 갤 화력 넘사로 셀 때라 개재밌었는데 그때 꽁치들 병맛글 지금 갤검해서 가끔 봐도 웃김ㅋㅋ. 늙병필 2329 16 1 4101996 일반 펨코, 에타, 블라, 나무위키 편집자, 아카사챈, 새뷰갤 다 합쳐도 1 ㅇㅇ61. 새뷰갤 오열 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 6 ㅇㅇ 0940 5684 일반 애국보수 나라가 망해야되는데 안망해서 화남 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 12 조희대 0936 5517 일반 속보 내란당 패배 선언 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 14 문석열 🔥토론 국민의힘 관세 15% 지켜라. 새보갤 파딱이 사실 환승연애 마이너 갤러리에서 남혐발언을 했음이 드러나 사퇴한 사건이다. 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 0고정닉 추천수0 비추천하기 0 실베추 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 전체 댓글 1새로고침 본문 보기 최신순 등록순 최신순 답글순 ㅇㅇ 걔는 새뷰갤 힘갤 고소도 바빠서 못함 ㄱㅊ 01. 히토미 안들어 가짐

히토미 펨보이 4 공지 새보갤 갱신차단자 리스트7 ashige_good 24. 내가 느낀 새뷰갤 ㅇㅇ 1359 57 6 3859029 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 준석이 최대 단점은 지가 잘났다고 생각하는거 4 ㅇㅇ112. 새뷰갤에 가볍고웃긴 로코만화 추천좀 벨 헤테로 지엘 다 안. 4 공지 새보갤 갱신차단자 리스트7 ashige_good 24. 17 잡담 dyaha 조회24 추천4.

히토미 여친 여동생 161 1356 67 2 3859026 🚯병먹 🚯병먹금 이준석 비례신당이 그나마 제일낫지않냐. 석렬이 계엄판단 내리는노망난 두뇌로 협상했으면일본보다 더한 개 흑우딜 했을듯반면 대재명 성남 만든거보셈분당 판교를 1등도시로 만듬. 제임스 클리버리 영국 외무부 장관은 25일현지시간 중국을 고립시키기 보다는 관계를 맺어야 한다며 중국 강경파를 겨냥한 입장을 밝혔다. 이 파딱은 서영이라는 반고닉으로 환승연애 갤러리에서 활동을 했으며, 한남충 역겨워 와 같은 남성혐오성 글을 올리는 짓을 했던게 드러났다. 새뷰갤에서 제일 차별받는 인종은 좌빨 아닌가.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.