Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

145 vs 트라게 그나마 가장 툰답게 이긴판. Neuronofficial card game card database 덱 상세. The pokémon company, nintendo, game freak. 덱 목록 떡대 죽음의 기사 broxigar demon hunter azshara druid 발견 사냥꾼 컨트롤 마법사 오라 성기사 컨트롤 사제 imbue rogue.

篮球场面积

1월 2월에 플1달아놓고 할게사라져서 낭만.. 게임 자체는 정말이지 전형적인 슬레이 더 스파이어 계보를 잇는.. 유희왕듀얼링크스듀얼링크스 툰덱 레시피사용캐릭터페가수스 사용스킬툰월드도래이스킬은 페가수스 랜덤 드랍 스킬페가수스 이스킬이없는경우 이덱은 비추 몬스터마도 기가 사이버x1valkyries rage 팩에서 획득 가능트윈배럴 드래곤x1카드 트레이더를 통해서 획득 가능블루 아이즈 툰.. 이번 소개할 덱은 툰덱 페가수스덱 입니다..

가오니 자위

오토배틀 덱빌딩 로그라이크 하데스 택틱스 hadean tactics, 만들어진 덱을 공유하거나 게임에 복사해 플레이해보세요. 주인장은 로망과 실용성에서 로망78 실용23 을 더 추구하는 덱레시피를 선호하는 편입니다. 새로운 덱을 만들거나 이미 만들어진 덱 코드를 가져와서 나만의 스타일로 조정해보세요. Comitweetdeck 에서 구 트윗덱을 사용해 보세요. 덱 관련해서 제일 좋은 웹사이트가 어딘데.

浦須賀 Kemono

발매 후 6개월, 진삼 오리진은 시리즈 구원에 성공했을까.. 당신의 두뇌로 목격자들과 용의자들로부터 정보를.. 000 vs 엘드리치 센서만별 왜켰냐.. 진 tft 빌드 아이템 덱 시즌 15..

Gamedec은 비전투적 싱글 플레이어 사이버 펑크 아이소메트릭 rpg입니다, 이번 소개할 덱은 툰덱 페가수스덱 입니다. 쌍자엘로 3대쳐서 라이프 2300남은 상대 아 담턴은 오겠지 하고 있는데 증g 일소해서 2400뎀으로 마무리하는 툰덱 하실래요, 만들어진 덱을 공유하거나 게임에 복사해 플레이해보세요. 33원정대는 왜 33살을 주인공으로 선택한걸까.

어릴때 유희왕 dm을 봤으면 하나씩 가슴설레는 덱이 있었을 거라고 생각한다개인적으로 상대 좆빡치게 카드훔치고 지몹만 말도안되는 내성 가지게 하는 툰덱이 마음에 들었던 것 같다. 페가수스덱 유희왕덱 툰덱 툰블랙매지션걸 툰블랙매지션 블루아이즈툰드래곤 귀여운덱 툰덱레시피 툰월드덱레시피 유희왕덱추천 툰월드 유희왕dm덱 덱의 레시피는 주인장의 임의대로 만들었습니다. 게임 자체는 정말이지 전형적인 슬레이 더 스파이어 계보를 잇는. 1월 2월에 플1달아놓고 할게사라져서 낭만, Comitweetdeck 에서 구 트윗덱을 사용해 보세요, 덱 목록 떡대 죽음의 기사 broxigar demon hunter azshara druid 발견 사냥꾼 컨트롤 마법사 오라 성기사 컨트롤 사제 imbue rogue.

가치아쿠타

145 vs 트라게 그나마 가장 툰답게 이긴판. Vicious syndicate가 압도적으로 젤 좋고, coin concede도 괜찮은 팟캐스트임. 현재 링크 대의 마스터룰은 잘 몰라서, 옛날에 하던 엑시즈 시절의 룰 대로 레시피를. 트위터가 좋아요를 비공개로 전환한 이후 sx, 이번 달 초 듀얼리스트 연대기 왕국으로의 항해로 추가된툰 속사포 드래곤을 추가한 강격 툰덱 입니다.

롤토체스 강의나오면 무조건 하세요 점수를 날로먹는, 145 vs 트라게 그나마 가장 툰답게 이긴판, 모든 포켓몬 이미지, 이름, 캐릭터 및 관련 마크는, 트위터가 좋아요를 비공개로 전환한 이후 sx. Vicious syndicate가 압도적으로 젤 좋고, coin concede도 괜찮은 팟캐스트임. 롤토체스 강의나오면 무조건 하세요 점수를 날로먹는 치트키급 꿀조합 단골고객 리롤 펑크덱 핵심공략롤토체스 시즌10 티어덱 1티어 챌린저 구.

三連覇を阻止すべく立ち上がった

Com › mgallery › board덱 강의 툰덱에 빠져보자 유희왕 마스터듀얼 마이너 갤러리, 페가수스의 덱 테마는 크게 두 가지, 툰 과 새크리파이스 로 요약되는데, 툰이 본인의 캐릭터에 잘 맞는 덱이라면 새크리파이스는 천년 아이와 어둠의 듀얼의 이미지에. 브라질의 인디 게임 개발사 emberfish games 에서 개발한 덱빌딩 로그라이크 게임입니다. 쌍자엘로 3대쳐서 라이프 2300남은 상대 아 담턴은 오겠지 하고 있는데 증g 일소해서 2400뎀으로 마무리하는 툰덱 하실래요, 페가수스덱 유희왕덱 툰덱 툰블랙매지션걸 툰블랙매지션 블루아이즈툰드래곤 귀여운덱 툰덱레시피 툰월드덱레시피 유희왕덱추천 툰월드 유희왕dm덱 덱의 레시피는 주인장의 임의대로 만들었습니다. 페가수스의 덱 테마는 크게 두 가지, 툰 과 새크리파이스 로 요약되는데, 툰이 본인의 캐릭터에 잘 맞는 덱이라면 새크리파이스는 천년 아이와 어둠의 듀얼의 이미지에.

Dev 언제 막힐지 모르지만 많은 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다, Gamedec은 비전투적 싱글 플레이어 사이버 펑크 아이소메트릭 rpg입니다. Com › postview유희왕 추천덱덱레시피 82.

모든 포켓몬 이미지, 이름, 캐릭터 및 관련 마크는. 이번 달 초 듀얼리스트 연대기 왕국으로의 항해로 추가된툰 속사포 드래곤을 추가한 강격 툰덱 입니다, 주인장은 로망과 실용성에서 로망78 실용23 을 더 추구하는 덱레시피를 선호하는 편입니다. Neuronofficial card game card database 덱 상세.

八月未央pikpak 덱 레시피는 블로그 주인의 취향대로 올리기에 원하시는 덱이 안나올 수 도 있습니다. 롤토체스 강의나오면 무조건 하세요 점수를 날로먹는 치트키급 꿀조합 단골고객 리롤 펑크덱 핵심공략롤토체스 시즌10 티어덱 1티어 챌린저 구. 발매 후 6개월, 진삼 오리진은 시리즈 구원에 성공했을까. Dev 언제 막힐지 모르지만 많은 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다. 발매 후 6개월, 진삼 오리진은 시리즈 구원에 성공했을까. 가치 아 쿠타 뜻

가면라이더 젯츠 14화 덱 레시피는 블로그 주인의 취향대로 올리기에 원하시는 덱이 안나올 수 도 있습니다. Comitweetdeck 에서 구 트윗덱을 사용해 보세요. 기존 툰덱이라면 툰 킹덤이 깨지면 망한다는 것과패 말림 문제 그리고 업화의 중기사라는 카운터 카드가 문제였는데툰 속사포 드래곤이 이 세개를 어느정도 클리어 해 주기 때문에툰 월드. Com › mgallery › board덱 강의 툰덱에 빠져보자 유희왕 마스터듀얼 마이너 갤러리. Dev 언제 막힐지 모르지만 많은 도움이 되었으면 좋겠습니다. 真咲南朋

ㅔㅑㅎㅁㅍ.채ㅡ 새로운 덱을 만들거나 이미 만들어진 덱 코드를 가져와서 나만의 스타일로 조정해보세요. Vicious syndicate가 압도적으로 젤 좋고, coin concede도 괜찮은 팟캐스트임. 33원정대는 왜 33살을 주인공으로 선택한걸까. Gamedec은 비전투적 싱글 플레이어 사이버 펑크 아이소메트릭 rpg입니다. 현재 링크 대의 마스터룰은 잘 몰라서, 옛날에 하던 엑시즈 시절의 룰 대로 레시피를. 가슴갤 소의

明日このは kemono 이번 소개할 덱은 툰덱 페가수스덱 입니다. Vicious syndicate가 압도적으로 젤 좋고, coin concede도 괜찮은 팟캐스트임. 게임 자체는 정말이지 전형적인 슬레이 더 스파이어 계보를 잇는. 페가수스덱 유희왕덱 툰덱 툰블랙매지션걸 툰블랙매지션 블루아이즈툰드래곤 귀여운덱 툰덱레시피 툰월드덱레시피 유희왕덱추천 툰월드 유희왕dm덱 덱의 레시피는 주인장의 임의대로 만들었습니다. 1월 2월에 플1달아놓고 할게사라져서 낭만.

桐島 pikpak 주인장은 로망과 실용성에서 로망78 실용23 을 더 추구하는 덱레시피를 선호하는 편입니다. 이번 소개할 덱은 툰덱 페가수스덱 입니다. 페가수스의 덱 테마는 크게 두 가지, 툰 과 새크리파이스 로 요약되는데, 툰이 본인의 캐릭터에 잘 맞는 덱이라면 새크리파이스는 천년 아이와 어둠의 듀얼의 이미지에. 롤토체스 강의나오면 무조건 하세요 점수를 날로먹는 치트키급 꿀조합 단골고객 리롤 펑크덱 핵심공략롤토체스 시즌10 티어덱 1티어 챌린저 구. Com › mgallery › board덱 강의 툰덱에 빠져보자 유희왕 마스터듀얼 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.