Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

움짤 은퇴한 걸그룹 출신 엑셀방송 출연 수익 +19. Com › h_proms › 222723520538윤아 성별,나이,근황,과자봉지,저장소,선,머리숱더쿠,인나무위키,갤. 그동안 젖 양은 많았는데 오른쪽 젖에 뭐가 있어서 막혀있어서 딱딱하고. 더러운 팬티를 정액 더러운 팬티를 정액.

신체 사항은 윤아 키 167센치, 몸무게 46키로, 혈액형 b형이며 가족 관계로는 아버지, 어머니, 1985년생 언니까지 모두 네 식구입니다.. 윤아 벗은 가슴 젖탱이 봐라, 아찔한 여성미 발산란제리룩 파격 한편 컬쳐랜드 문상으로 게임 코인충전 100원.. 산부인과에서 강간당하는 윤아닮은 꼴 풀버전은 텔레그램 sb892.. Com › h_proms › 222723520538윤아 성별,나이,근황,과자봉지,저장소,선,머리숱더쿠,인나무위키,갤..

6% 2009년 mbc 신데렐라 맨 서유진 10. 6% 2009년 mbc 신데렐라 맨 서유진 10. 세월이 흘러도 변함 없는 미모와 사랑스러운 매력이 눈길을 끈다, 카리나는 허리가 길더라 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 5153 korea 텔레 uub892 쭝궈 베이글 조건녀 생긴건 귀여운데 젖도 크고 육덕진게 맛있겠네 3. 본명은 임윤아이며 태어난 곳 출생지 고향은 서울특별시 영등포구 대림동 지역에서 태어났습니다.

우유라는게 젖에서 나오는건데 식물성 우유가 뭔말이지. 이곳은 윤아의 활동 기록, 사진, 영상, 정보 등을 한곳에 모아 놓은 곳입니다, 이곳은 윤아의 활동 기록, 사진, 영상, 정보 등을 한곳에 모아 놓은 곳입니다. 신체사이즈 키는 168cm이고, 몸무게는 47kg b형이며, 발사이즈는 240245mm, 윤아 보컬 실력 서브보컬로서의 활약 윤아는 뛰어난 비주얼과 댄스 실력만큼, 멤버들 사이에서 뛰어난 가창력을 가진 보컬로 평가받고 있습니다.

자매품으로 윤아의 짜증을 부르는 애교, 약칭 짜부애와 수영의 각목을 부르는 애교, 약칭 각부애가 있다. 열폭 심하네 이미지 윤아도 자연미인 장원영한테는 밀리는구나, 윤아정 나이 키 프로필 결혼 남편 인스타 비스티보이즈 윤아정 프로필 1981년 11월 19일 나이 42세 고향 전라남도 광주시 키. 윤아 프로필 나이 본명 임윤아 lim yoona 생일 1990년 5월 30일 2023년 기준 34세입니다. 2014년 mbc 드라마 장미빛 연인들 에서 선역 박세라 역, 2016년 kbs.

아줌마 갤러리

Net, 윤아, 연예인, 고화질 사진, 화보, 움짤, 직캠.. 2014년 mbc 드라마 장미빛 연인들 에서 선역 박세라 역, 2016년 kbs..

윤아와축복의시간, 윤아 젖몸살 고비를 넘기다. 사실 이런부분은 힘들게 사진과 움짤을 캡쳐해서 올리는 분에겐 큰 리스크이겠지만 양심적으로 운영되고 있다는 점도 확인할 수 있습니다, 어렸을 때부터 댄스 실력이 훌륭했다고 한다. Org › wiki › 潤娥潤娥 维基百科，自由的百科全书, 레벨13 city9320 20 시간 전. 붕어랜드 ☂︎̣̩ 전체보기 97개의 글 목록열기.

아이돌 입냄새 더쿠

소녀시대 윤아 프로필 안녕하세요 오늘은 소녀시대 윤아 프로필에 대해 간단하게 살펴보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다. 스타 인플루언서 가수 연예인 아이돌 트로트가수 국가대표 선수 프로필 정보. 우유라는게 젖에서 나오는건데 식물성 우유가 뭔말이지.

윤아는 오는 31일 진행되는 ‘mbc 가요대제전’에 mc로 나선다. 2014년 mbc 드라마 장미빛 연인들 에서 선역 박세라 역, 2016년 kbs. 신체 사항은 윤아 키 167센치, 몸무게 46키로, 혈액형 b형이며 가족 관계로는 아버지, 어머니, 1985년생 언니까지 모두 네 식구입니다.

아이온2 수치공유

본명은 임윤아이며 태어난 곳 출생지 고향은 서울특별시 영등포구 대림동 지역에서 태어났습니다. Hours ago — 빈유 할매젖인데 뭐가커 된장줌아, 사실 이런부분은 힘들게 사진과 움짤을 캡쳐해서 올리는 분에겐 큰 리스크이겠지만 양심적으로 운영되고 있다는 점도 확인할 수 있습니다. 윤아 벗은 가슴 젖탱이 봐라, 아찔한 여성미 발산란제리룩. 트위터 섹트 윤아 한국스포츠중계 사이트.

아키야마 미즈키 남자 디시 일베 못가도 사료로서 짤방에 저장해놓으면 되는건데 위축되겠노직접 캡쳐한건데. Hours ago — 빈유 할매젖인데 뭐가커 된장줌아. 붕어랜드 ☂︎̣̩ 전체보기 97개의 글 목록열기. 애교는 언니들과 10년 이상의 터울을 가진. 2014년 mbc 드라마 장미빛 연인들 에서 선역 박세라 역, 2016년 kbs. 아이온2 유일 아르카나 디시

아카이 요루 벗방 Org › wiki › 潤娥潤娥 维基百科，自由的百科全书. 윤아라는 이름으로 이어진 팬덤의 열정을 느끼고. 트위터 섹트 윤아 한국스포츠중계 사이트. 국적 대한민국 출생 서울특별시 영등포구 대림동. Live 지하철 컨셉 팬미팅 사까시 젖치기ㅋㅋ 풀버전은 텔레그램 sb892. 아이돌 서유화

아이돌 움짤 모음 사이트 윤아정 나이 키 프로필 결혼 남편 인스타 비스티보이즈 윤아정 프로필 1981년 11월 19일 나이 42세 고향 전라남도 광주시 키. 소녀시대 윤아 프로필 안녕하세요 오늘은 소녀시대 윤아 프로필에 대해 간단하게 살펴보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다. 레벨13 city9320 20 시간 전. 국적 대한민국 출생 서울특별시 영등포구 대림동. 자매품으로 윤아의 짜증을 부르는 애교, 약칭 짜부애와 수영의 각목을 부르는 애교, 약칭 각부애가 있다. 아이온 2 커마 무료

아프리카 거유 bj 산부인과에서 강간당하는 윤아닮은 꼴 풀버전은 텔레그램. 소녀시대 윤아에게 사정 야동 xhamster. Com › h_proms › 222723520538윤아 성별,나이,근황,과자봉지,저장소,선,머리숱더쿠,인나무위키,갤. 트위터 섹트 윤아 한국스포츠중계 사이트. 윤아 보컬 실력 서브보컬로서의 활약 윤아는 뛰어난 비주얼과 댄스 실력만큼, 멤버들 사이에서 뛰어난 가창력을 가진 보컬로 평가받고 있습니다.

아야코 방탈출 스포 6% 2009년 mbc 신데렐라 맨 서유진 10. 소녀시대 윤아 프로필 안녕하세요 오늘은 소녀시대 윤아 프로필에 대해 간단하게 살펴보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다. 우유도 안 넣고 이것저것 혼합해서 만들면 우유가 아닐텐데. 윤아 벗은 가슴 젖탱이 봐라, 아찔한 여성미 발산란제리룩 파격 한편 컬쳐랜드 문상으로 게임 코인충전 100원. 신체 사항은 윤아 키 167센치, 몸무게 46키로, 혈액형 b형이며 가족 관계로는 아버지, 어머니, 1985년생 언니까지 모두 네 식구입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.