Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

App › zhcn › searchmaskpark树洞论坛是什么？它的影响和争议有哪些？. Maskpark事件最新进展（截至2025年7月29日） 一、警方通报与案件侦办情况‌立案侦查‌ 根据多地警方通报，目前已接到包括d女士、m女士在内的37名受害者报案，涉及非法传播隐私影像、敲诈勒索等罪名。北京警方已对3. P56是另一个所谓3k人的maskpark频道的人数增长曲线。 这里面直接一天天降3k天兵。 作为对照的正常频道数据以及被封的频道数据： p7是正常运行的一个频道的增长曲线。 p8和p9是一个被封掉的频道的增长曲线。 这些都是抖动的曲线，不存在一天天降天兵。 。。. 在這個龐大的加密群組中，聚集了超過10萬名「用戶」。他們上傳了海量的偷拍影像，從商場、酒店、醫院、校園到私人住所無孔不入，受害者包括陌生女性、偷拍者 read more.

多位博主发帖称，一个名为maskpark树洞论坛的境外加密群组大规模散布涉及我国公民的隐私内容。 d女士告诉记者，今年5月，她发现自己的私密照片被前男友.. 前男友把她卖给了十万人：起底跨境偷拍群的肮脏交易 南方+..

Missav Alive

Mlnxxu

Maskpark树洞论坛是一个在telegram等即时通讯平台上运营的群组，主要以传播色情视频和偷拍照片为目的。 这个论坛在2025年7月被曝光，因其涉及大量女性的私密影像而引起社会广泛关注和愤怒，许多人将其称为中国版n号房 1 3。, Maskpark 中國n號房（已上香港地區的新聞）. A foreign platform named maskpark treehole forum has been exposed on mainland social media for disseminating obscene videos of chinese women, Net › news › 20250724專攻「大陸女性」偷拍網站被檢舉 「n號房」翻版超過22萬人訂閱 etto. Maskpark 是一个通过 telegram 等 即時通訊 平台运营的散播色情视频和 偷拍 照片的群組，该群組還管理20余个子群组，其成员规模超过10万人 註 1。 事件於2025年7月被曝光後，被網民稱為中國版的 n号房事件。 1.

Missav 미우라 사쿠라

51海角乱伦 曝光中国n号房事件maskpark树洞论坛会员达10 境外加密论坛：名为maskpark树洞论坛的telegram群组，成员全为中国男性，总规模超10万人，最大群组达90万人。. 在這個龐大的加密群組中，聚集了超過10萬名「用戶」。他們上傳了海量的偷拍影像，從商場、酒店、醫院、校園到私人住所無孔不入，受害者包括陌生女性、偷拍者 read more. Maskpark樹洞｜中國n號房事件整合女私密照被公開、涉90萬受害者maskpark maskpark樹洞 中國n號房 n號房. 这个依托境外加密通讯软件 telegram 建立的 maskpark 树洞论坛，被激愤的网民称为 中国版 n号房 。 媒体报道称，该论坛成员超10万人（均为中国男性），下设20余个细分群组，最大群组订阅量达90万人，每日新增偷拍内容成千上万。.

Com › question › 1930861655547450513如何看待最近爆出的「mask park」事件，这是真的吗？, 在這個龐大的加密群組中，聚集了超過10萬名「用戶」。他們上傳了海量的偷拍影像，從商場、酒店、醫院、校園到私人住所無孔不入，受害者包括陌生女性、偷拍者 read more, 论坛上发布的防走丢链接。受害者d女士提供 法律利剑：传播牟利最高可判无期，证据保全至关重要 面对如此猖獗的跨境网络犯罪，受害者如何维权, 圖片來源：pexels 綜合港媒《hk01》及網友爆料，「maskpark樹洞論壇」主要活躍於telegram等加密通訊平台，據稱大部分成員為中國男性， 群組內除大量偷拍陌生女性影像外，更涉及教師、學生、親友，範圍涵蓋地鐵、學校、甚至私人住所。.

Maskpark树洞论坛是一个在中国社交平台上存在的群组，因其涉及传播偷拍女性私密影像而引发了广泛的争议和社会关注。以下是关于该论坛的一些关键点： 1, 網現中國版「n號房」成員逾10萬 偷拍女性私密影像 內地多個社交平台近日爆料有一個叫「maskpark樹洞論壇」的境外群組，專門散播中國女性的淫穢影片，成員均為中國男性，規模逾10萬人。 該論壇下設至少20個細分群組，主題均與色情相關，最大群組成員達90萬人。. Maskpark 树洞论坛全新频道 学习交流群组：st, Maskpark 事件的曝光，本应是全社会聚焦隐私保护、网络治理与打击犯罪的契机，却被部分极端女权势力与逐利自媒体扭曲为煽动性别对立的工具。她们滥用受害者叙事，用未经证实的流量数据制造恐慌，以 全体男性有罪, 這個由超過10萬名中國男性組成的「maskpark樹洞論壇」境外群組，旗下還設立20個分群，其中規模最大的達90萬人。 該話題在微博上的討論量，遠超排名第一的話題，但未上熱搜榜，疑似遭到壓制。 用line看新聞正夯 優質頻道在這裡👉 slin. A secret telegram group names maskpark with over 100k members and 900k viewers, has been sharing nonconsensual intimate photos and videos of women and girls, including material taken from their families and in public spaces.

mmporns 網現中國版「n號房」成員逾10萬 偷拍女性私密影像 內地多個社交平台近日爆料有一個叫「maskpark樹洞論壇」的境外群組，專門散播中國女性的淫穢影片，成員均為中國男性，規模逾10萬人。 該論壇下設至少20個細分群組，主題均與色情相關，最大群組成員達90萬人。. Maskpark and the silence around chinas genderbased. Hidden behind the encrypted walls of telegram—a. Telegram channel maskpark树洞论坛 @masksvip on telemetrio dont get caught by a cheater. 你如何看待maskpark 事件？ rchinese. miss av.wa

myfans rimu Maskpark 是一個通過 telegram 等 即時通訊 平台運營的散播色情視頻和 偷拍 照片的群組，該群組還管理20餘個子群組，其成員規模超過10萬人 註 1。 事件於2025年7月被曝光後，被網民稱為中國版的 n號房事件。 1. App › zhcn › searchmaskpark树洞论坛是什么？它的影响和争议有哪些？. Hidden behind the encrypted walls of telegram—a. 论坛上发布的防走丢链接。受害者d女士提供 法律利剑：传播牟利最高可判无期，证据保全至关重要 面对如此猖獗的跨境网络犯罪，受害者如何维权. 中国大学生墙外的根据地（也欢迎非大学生） 群组 @shudongbn 投稿解封 @shudongadolf 树洞简介：2022年3月到8月，几个北大学生创建了抒发森林和comin两款app，作为全国大学生网络社区，两款app被称为树洞。后因其中政治敏感内容过多，被关停，创建者也被当局严厉警告。树洞的墙内本体已经被消灭，但. mmemme_강원도커플

missav 구토 在這個龐大的加密群組中，聚集了超過10萬名「用戶」。他們上傳了海量的偷拍影像，從商場、酒店、醫院、校園到私人住所無孔不入，受害者包括陌生女性、偷拍者 read more. Net › news › 20250724專攻「大陸女性」偷拍網站被檢舉 「n號房」翻版超過22萬人訂閱 etto. Newtalk新聞 近日，「中國版 n 號房」疑雲在中國各大社群平台掀起熱議，多名用戶陸續曝光 telegram 等私密群組內，有數以萬計男性成員傳播偷拍或非法性交影像，受害對象涵蓋陌生女性、親友、師生等。據披露投稿指出，「maskpark 樹洞論壇」成員高達十萬人，被害人數可能達 90 萬，使整起事件引發. 据南方都市报报道，近期，多位博主发帖称，一个名为maskpark树洞论坛的境外加密群组，正在大规模散布涉及我国公民的隐私内容。 据报道，该. Maskpark 維基百科，自由的百科全書. mnssav

mypikpak spanking Maskpark树洞论坛是一个在telegram等即时通讯平台上运营的群组，主要以传播色情视频和偷拍照片为目的。 这个论坛在2025年7月被曝光，因其涉及大量女性的私密影像而引起社会广泛关注和愤怒，许多人将其称为中国版n号房 1 3。. A secret telegram group names maskpark with over 100k members and 900k viewers, has been sharing nonconsensual intimate photos and videos of women and girls, including material taken from their families and in public spaces. Com › question › 1930861655547450513如何看待最近爆出的「mask park」事件，这是真的吗？. 近期，maskpark事件的曝光，犹如一颗重磅炸弹，在社会舆论场掀起惊涛骇浪，刺痛了公众的神经，也将女性隐私安全这一严峻问题，毫无遮掩地摆在了我们面前。 这一事件的恶劣程度令人发指。在telegram平台上，maskpar. 中国大学生墙外的根据地（也欢迎非大学生） 群组 @shudongbn 投稿解封 @shudongadolf 树洞简介：2022年3月到8月，几个北大学生创建了抒发森林和comin两款app，作为全国大学生网络社区，两款app被称为树洞。后因其中政治敏感内容过多，被关停，创建者也被当局严厉警告。树洞的墙内本体已经被消灭，但.

missvod4.com 如何看待最近爆出的「mask park」事件，这是真的吗？ 一个境外加密群组内存在大量偷拍行为，涉及地铁，商场，学校等公共场所，群成员高达10万，部分内容涉及，妻子，女友，甚至女儿的私密视频，受害人众多，高达9 显示全部 关注者 2,210. 近期，maskpark事件的曝光，犹如一颗重磅炸弹，在社会舆论场掀起惊涛骇浪，刺痛了公众的神经，也将女性隐私安全这一严峻问题，毫无遮掩地摆在了我们面前。 这一事件的恶劣程度令人发指。在telegram平台上，maskpar. When the maskpark incident broke in mid2025, it jolted the chinese internet hawkins 2025. 圖片來源：pexels 綜合港媒《hk01》及網友爆料，「maskpark樹洞論壇」主要活躍於telegram等加密通訊平台，據稱大部分成員為中國男性， 群組內除大量偷拍陌生女性影像外，更涉及教師、學生、親友，範圍涵蓋地鐵、學校、甚至私人住所。. Maskpark 是一個通過 telegram 等 即時通訊 平台運營的散播色情視頻和 偷拍 照片的群組，該群組還管理20餘個子群組，其成員規模超過10萬人 註 1。 事件於2025年7月被曝光後，被網民稱為中國版的 n號房事件。 1.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.