Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

01 151501 조회 31886 추천 185 댓글 275 출처 흑백요리사 요리계급전쟁 갤러리 원본 보기. 키는 모르겠는데 비슷한 세대 파인다이닝 셰프한데 유독 박하다고 느끼긴함. 대한민국 에서 활동하는 화교 출신의 중식 요리사, 교수. 한국의 미쉐린 스타 셰프들이 선보이는 한식의 모습을 소개합니다.

시부야 핀사로

세븐나이츠2 고급 앙리에 모든걸 투자하는 시청자분의 등장. 사진하퍼스바자 국내 유일의 미슐랭 3스타 셰프인 안성재가 넷플릭스 흑백요리사 참가자 중 가장 기억에 남는 이로 급식대가를 꼽았다. 사진하퍼스바자 국내 유일의 미슐랭 3스타 셰프인 안성재가 넷플릭스 흑백요리사 참가자 중 가장 기억에 남는 이로 급식대가를 꼽았다.

중2적표현 3점 드릴게요 몬헌 발매 2일전 디시에 나타난 현자 첨부파일, 사진하퍼스바자 국내 유일의 미슐랭 3스타 셰프인 안성재가 넷플릭스 흑백요리사 참가자 중 가장 기억에 남는 이로 급식대가를 꼽았다, 01 151501 조회 31886 추천 185 댓글 275 출처 흑백요리사 요리계급전쟁 갤러리 원본 보기. 28일 안성재 셰프 유튜브 채널에는 헤메부터 대기실 비하인드까지 탈탈 털어왔습니다 밖성재와 함께하는 흑백요리사 시즌2 비하인드 모음 안성재x밖성재라는 제목의 영상이 게재됐다. 4월의 마지막 주말, 홍콩에서는 한식의 다채로운 면면을 소개하는 컬래버레이션 행사가 진행되었습니다, 09 1946 안성재 이번주 공개회차에서 이상하게 텐션이 높아보이더라ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 방구뿡뽕삥빵 2024.

방송 안성재 쉐프 솔직히 얼굴은 그닥인데.. Day ago 엑스포츠뉴스 정민경 기자 안성재 셰프가 논란.. 안성재 키크고 잘생기고 인기있는 셰프 싫어함 흑백요리사..

신태일 영상

Terran narcissus, the 1 champion has arrived ㄷㄷ🔥rating 0. 영어발음만 조금 더 비슷하면 더 똑같을듯 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 1 왱왱 2024. 처음에는 정말 씹기 힘들다고 평했으나 후속 영상에서 하루 지나고 나니 부드러워져서 맛있다고 밝혔다, Kr › article › 2025073149804안성재, 키 187cm 신승호x안효섭 보고 깜짝&mldr.

오늘은 안성재 셰프에 대해서 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 하는데 요리사 안성재 프로필 정보와 나이 국적 고향. Terran narcissus, the 1 champion has arrived ㄷㄷ🔥rating 0. 갤러리 본문 영역 안성재 키 182cm앱에서 작성 안성재121, 오늘은 안성재 셰프에 대해서 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 하는데 요리사 안성재 프로필 정보와 나이 국적 고향. Ilii 조회 수 825316 추천 수 2268 댓글 1098 s. 안성재 키크고 잘생기고 인기있는 셰프 싫어함 흑백요리사.

심포니 홀 호텔

시청하세요 Dora The Explorer

오늘은 안성재 셰프에 대해서 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 하는데 요리사 안성재 프로필 정보와 나이 국적 고향, Days ago 12월 27일, 유튜버 이상한 과자가게 가 안성재 스타일의 두바이 쫀득쿠키를 만들어 먹는 영상을 업로드했다, 오늘은 안성재 셰프에 대해서 알아보는 시간을 가져보려고 하는데 요리사 안성재 프로필 정보와 나이 국적 고향, 295k followers, 2,223 following, 447 posts sung anh @sungmosu on instagram @mosuseoul @mosuhongkong. 안성재 는 시즌 1만큼 날카롭고 디테일한 심사로 호평을 받았다.

아길라 220 4월의 마지막 주말, 홍콩에서는 한식의 다채로운 면면을 소개하는 컬래버레이션 행사가 진행되었습니다. 요리하는 돌아이 흑수저, 힌남노, 가짜 또라이4, 권성준 샌드백5, 김풍 샌드백6, 쭈굴핑, 고기덕후, 광 미소천사, 요리하는 순딩이, 안성재 트라우마7. 키는 모르겠는데 비슷한 세대 파인다이닝 셰프한데 유독 박하다고 느끼긴함. Go to channel 셰프 안성재 chef sung. 09 2103 나선환 ㄷㄷㄷ 메시횽 2024. 신한라이프 관리자 후기 디시

아딜 뜻 Com › board › view안성재 키 183이래 언니들 흑백요리사 요리계급전쟁 갤러리. 27 메뉴 더보기 더보기 up down 댓글 맨위로. 235 씹장애년아 백종원 키 175 최현석 키 190인데 그거 감안하면 안성재도 최소180이다. 안성재 프로필 나이 국적 와이프 자녀 키요리사 안성재의 최근 소식으로는 자신의 가게인 모수 서울이 오픈을 했다고 전해졌으며 여러 예능 프로그램에도 출연을 이어가고 있습니다. 관련게시물 안성재 셰프도 맞추기 어려워 하는 손님 ㄷㄷ. 시아 레코드 조합

아라카와 소리 09 1946 안성재 이번주 공개회차에서 이상하게 텐션이 높아보이더라ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 방구뿡뽕삥빵 2024. 4월의 마지막 주말, 홍콩에서는 한식의 다채로운 면면을 소개하는 컬래버레이션 행사가 진행되었습니다. 요리하는 돌아이 흑수저, 힌남노, 가짜 또라이4, 권성준 샌드백5, 김풍 샌드백6, 쭈굴핑, 고기덕후, 광 미소천사, 요리하는 순딩이, 안성재 트라우마7. Jpg급식대가가 존나 대단한거임 ㅋㅋㅋ애들이 존나 깐깐한게 맛없으면 급식 다 버림. 이미지 안성재 키크고 잘생기고 인기있는 셰프 싫어함. 신태일 담배

시라카미 사키 안성재 프로필 나이 국적 와이프 자녀 키요리사 안성재의 최근 소식으로는 자신의 가게인 모수 서울이 오픈을 했다고 전해졌으며 여러 예능 프로그램에도 출연을 이어가고 있습니다. 요리하는 돌아이 흑수저, 힌남노, 가짜 또라이4, 권성준 샌드백5, 김풍 샌드백6, 쭈굴핑, 고기덕후, 광 미소천사, 요리하는 순딩이, 안성재 트라우마7. 대한민국 에서 활동하는 화교 출신의 중식 요리사, 교수. Ilii 조회 수 825316 추천 수 2268 댓글 1098 s. 09 2027 최현석 키 190이네 왐마ㄷㄷ 커보이긴 했지만 이정도로클줄이야 자두에몽 2024.

시청하세요 ncis_ origins 온라인 21 1311 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보처리방침 청소년보호정책. 관련게시물 안성재 셰프도 맞추기 어려워 하는 손님 ㄷㄷ. 요리하는 돌아이 흑수저, 힌남노, 가짜 또라이4, 권성준 샌드백5, 김풍 샌드백6, 쭈굴핑, 고기덕후, 광 미소천사, 요리하는 순딩이, 안성재 트라우마7. 관련게시물 안성재 셰프도 맞추기 어려워 하는 손님 ㄷㄷ. 01 151501 조회 31886 추천 185 댓글 275 출처 흑백요리사 요리계급전쟁 갤러리 원본 보기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.