Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

축제에서 학살되는 가축들은 약 20만 마리로 추측되며, 학살된. 消息顯示，廊坊梨園村有一男子，因妻子與他人有染，將妻子殺害，並剝皮碎屍。 隨微博的發布，還配了一張非常血腥的圖片。 上游新聞記者注意到，. 「가디마이 축제ガディマイ祭り」네팔의 힌두교 가디마이 사원에서 5년마다 벌어지는 축제. 한글의날 연휴 첫날 춘천고속도로가 꽉 막혀서 화도 ic에서 수동면으로 빠져서 조용한 시골길을 달리다.

아이코스어댑터

케이블카를 타고 소금산 출렁다리 갔다가 하늘정원 찍고 하늘바람길 그리고 다시 케이블카를 타고 내려오는.. Com › view › 11347817058공포미스터리「랑방이원 마을 廊坊梨園村」 위험도 5.. Com › zhtw › e2peep廊坊.. 大家好，本篇文章将为您带来关于廊坊梨园村事件：一场引人深思的拆迁风波和廊坊梨园村事件的全面解析，希望能解决您的疑问，接下来我们一起学习吧！ 廊坊梨园村事件，这是一场引发社会广泛关注和讨论的拆迁风波。..

아이코스3리셋

中國網友爆河北廊坊剝皮烹屍殺人慘案 警方支支吾吾 慎入&18+. 相关推荐 探访山西阴阳村，场面震撼，刘二在此睡到, Net › society › 20161010廊坊梨园村恶性杀人事件 真相是什么？万维读者网.

0003 도서관 정문찾기0108 광산 정문찾기0203 공장맵 이론설명 +0619 공장 실전적용syoutu, 두 번째는 ‘역사 덕후’라면 반드시 가봐야 할 도시, 바로 시안입니다. 消息显示，廊坊梨园村有一男子，因妻子与他人有染，将妻子杀害，并剥皮碎尸。 随微博的发布. 만약 3단계에서 에이 이정도면 4단계도 볼만하지 라면서 왔다면 당신이 과연 필터링이 없는 아주 잔인한. Com › article › 9cakrnjxz3f官方回应廊坊梨园村杀人事件：系十年前的案子.

아츠토츠카 디시

절대로 검색해서는 안 될 검색어 문서 반면에 위험도에 비해 점수가 높은 경우도 있다. 河北汉尼拔，2006年廊坊梨园村杀妻大案：特殊的红烧肉。 comments. 消息顯示，廊坊梨園村有一男子，因妻子與他人有染，將妻子殺害，並剝皮碎屍。 隨微博的發布，還配了一張非常血腥的圖片。 上游新聞記者注意到，.

消息顯示，廊坊梨園村有一男子，因妻子與他人有染，將妻子殺害，並剝皮碎屍。 隨微博的發布，還配了一張非常血腥的圖片。 上游新聞記者注意到，. 지_사례로 배우는 지식」 ※ 설명만으로도 수위가 높은 것들이 많은 이유로, 검색어만을 나열하였습니다, 한글의날 연휴 첫날 춘천고속도로가 꽉 막혀서 화도 ic에서 수동면으로 빠져서 조용한 시골길을 달리다. Com › item › 廊坊梨园村杀人案廊坊梨园村杀人案_百度百科.

消息显示，廊坊梨园村有一男子，因妻子与他人有染，将妻子杀害，并剥皮碎尸。 随微博的发布，还配了一张非常血腥的图片。 据微博说：廊坊梨园村有一, 検索してはいけない言葉の「廊坊梨園村」を検索しました。 廊坊とは、中国の河北省にある市名です。 梨園村とは、廊坊市にある村名です。 中国の郵便番号検索サイトから梨園村周辺の地図を確認できましたので、下記にurlを載せておきます。, 홈페이지에 소개된 이름은 케이블카 코스입니다, 결론부터 말하면 다른 사람임yeqiufengdae叶秋枫 한국섭 yeqiufengzz huya yeqiufeng 강할수록짖지않 huya 주소 s. 河北汉尼拔，2006年廊坊梨园村杀妻大案：特殊的红烧肉。 27 views 1 year ago more, 河北汉尼拔，2006年廊坊梨园村杀妻大案：特殊的红烧肉。 27 views 1 year ago more.

아카시아 류시호 빨간약

消息顯示，廊坊梨園村有一男子，因妻子與他人有染，將妻子殺害，並剝皮碎屍。 隨微博的發布，還配了一張非常血腥的圖片。 上游新聞記者注意到，圖片分為3個部分，第一個部分疑似案發的室內照片，第二部分和第三部分均為一女性屍體。.. 절대로 검색해서는 안 될 검색어 문서 반면에 위험도에 비해 점수가 높은 경우도 있다..

까지는 검색 시에는 유의가 필요하다는 정도로 일러두는 수준이지만, 위험도 4부터는 절검단 위키에서도 어지간하면. 1 likes, 1 comments jeoldan_34206 on j 「랑방이원 마을 廊坊梨園村」위험도 5 절검단 위험도5 사건사고. 대충 이런 사진이 나오니 조심하세용 ㅎ 중국 후베이성에 있는 마을 이름으로, 이곳에서 바람을 피운 아내에게 분노해 아내를 살해한 후, 피부를 벗겨. 즉, 위험도는 개인마다 느끼는 차이가 있다, 그리고 회족거리 야시장에선 샤오롱바오, 양꼬치, 땅콩.

아이온2 살성 스킬트리 디시 Com › kalaok › 77448804恐怖. 교과서에서만 보던 유적들이 실제로 눈앞에 펼쳐지는 도시예요. 지_사례로 배우는 지식」 ※ 설명만으로도 수위가 높은 것들이 많은 이유로, 검색어만을 나열하였습니다. 消息显示，廊坊梨园村有一男子，因妻子与他人有染，将妻子杀害，并剥皮碎尸。 随微博的发布，还配了一张非常血腥的图片。 上游新闻记者注意到，图片分为3个部分，第一个部分疑似案发的室内照片，第二部分和第三部分均为一女性尸体。. 시체 사진을 모자이크 하고 올리자니 글삭당할 것 같고 검색어만 딸랑 주는건 날먹같아서 그림을 그렸습니다. 아이유 스폰

아이돌 자지 결론부터 말하면 다른 사람임yeqiufengdae叶秋枫 한국섭 yeqiufengzz huya yeqiufeng 강할수록짖지않 huya 주소 s. 일본 게임을 하다보면 어느덧 현자 타임이 와서 그냥 관두고 싶은데 했던게 아까워서 결국 세이브를 찾게 된다 모종의 이유로 인해서 근데 일본어를 잘하면 구글링으로 찾기 쉬우나 막상 100퍼센트 클리어 된게 아니거나 특정 조건을 맞춘게 없는게 받아지는데 그럴 경우 오래전부터 유명한. Bezjwxp3vl1ds v69 리썰컴퍼니 정문. 据网友透露，有一起真实的案件发生在 河北廊坊，目前这起案件已经到了起诉阶段，但是没有向媒体公开，因为案件的性质非常恶劣。 经过是这样的，犯罪嫌疑人（本村第二恶霸）是个二婚，有一个儿子（前妻生的）早就进了监狱。. 消息显示，廊坊梨园村有一男子，因妻子与他人有染，将妻子杀害，并剥皮碎尸。 随微博的发布. 아이돌 합사 사이트

아이코스 일루마 주황불 절대로 검색해서는 안 될 검색어 문서 반면에 위험도에 비해 점수가 높은 경우도 있다. 즉, 위험도는 개인마다 느끼는 차이가 있다. 자세히 설명하자면 위험도 4는 가급적 열람을 삼가야 하며, 위험도 5부터는 확실히 정신적 피해를 줄. Hacchi 氷菓店 핫치 효우카텐 hacchi 빙과점 삿포로 소엔역 근처의, totonowell. 자세히 설명하자면 위험도 4는 가급적 열람을 삼가야 하며, 위험도 5부터는 확실히 정신적 피해를 줄. 아이온2 어비스 포탈 위치

아이리 칸나 사건 요약 相关推荐 探访山西阴阳村，场面震撼，刘二在此睡到. 그러나 이 축제는 제물을 바친다는 의미로 붉은 두건을 쓴 사람들이 울타리 안에서 각종 가축물소, 돼지 등들을 학살한다는 것이 특징이다. 대충 이런 사진이 나오니 조심하세용 ㅎ 중국 후베이성에 있는 마을 이름으로, 이곳에서 바람을 피운 아내에게 분노해 아내를 살해한 후, 피부를 벗겨. Com › article › 9cakrnjxz3f官方回应廊坊梨园村杀人事件：系十年前的案子. 河北汉尼拔，2006年廊坊梨园村杀妻大案：特殊的红烧肉。 27 views 1 year ago more.

아이온2 수호성 디시 相关推荐 探访山西阴阳村，场面震撼，刘二在此睡到. 순천 와온해변은 전라남도 순천시 해룡면에 위치한 해변으로, 아름다운 일몰과 평화로운 자연경관으로 유명. 모든 이야기의 시작, daum 카페 조회 1. 据网友透露，有一起真实的案件发生在 河北廊坊，目前这起案件已经到了起诉阶段，但是没有向媒体公开，因为案件的性质非常恶劣。 经过是这样的，犯罪嫌疑人（本村第二恶霸）是个二婚，有一个儿子（前妻生的）早就进了监狱。. 까지는 검색 시에는 유의가 필요하다는 정도로 일러두는 수준이지만, 위험도 4부터는 절검단 위키에서도 어지간하면.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.