Duan candice yushuang 段余霜 is a desk host for the lpl.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Candice liquipedia league of legends wiki. 다음은 캔디스 유 수앙과의 인터뷰 전문이다. 근데 아이리스는 네이티브 가능하지만 캔디스는 조금 어색함. Title중국 롤 lpl 캔디스 유슈앙 미녀 아나운서 인터뷰어 열애 결별 나무위키 93년생 나이.

5 Lpl 근데 Blg 우지랑 독고 같이 쓰는건 좀 돈낭비 같은데 18 Lyh0814 2021.

18 2336 Lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 인스타그램.

그리고 힐다 는 자기가 생각할 때 완벽할 때만 한국어로 인터뷰 하겠음 이라고 밝혀서 아직은 한국어 실력 미공개, 15일 오후 중국 상하이 메르세데스 벤츠 아레나에서 열린 2023 lpl 스프링 결승전을 앞두고 관저위안이 유슈앙에게 프로포즈했다. Lpl 결승전서 호스트 캔디스에 프로포즈 한 해설자 스포츠.

캔디스 유슈앙은 한국 Lol 팬들에게도 알려진 Lpl 호스트다.

중국 롤 lpl 캔디스 유슈앙 미녀 아나운서 인터뷰어 열애 결별.. Kr › news › view2025 msi lpl 호스트 캔디스 선수와 팬 연결하는 번역기선수 감.. 4일부터 7일까지 서울 장충체육관에서 2019 lol 리프트 라이벌즈 레드가 진행된다.. Twitter&weibo @余霜yscandice..

17 2156 애플코리아 캔디스 실물도이쁜디 3 애플코리아 2021. 15일 오후 중국 상하이 메르세데스 벤츠 아레나에서 열린 2023 lpl 스프링 결승전을 앞두고 관저위안이 유슈앙에게 프로포즈했다. 9년차 베테랑 lpl 호스트선수팬 이어주는 역할 al과 젠지 경기 인상깊어샹크스 발언 감동 받았다 리그 오브 레전드lol롤를 좋아하는. Com › kokr › news2025 msi lpl 호스트 캔디스 선수와 팬 연결하는 번역기선수 감. 외국 유학을 한 건 아니지만 빼어난 영어 실력을 보여줬으며 lol 월드 챔피언십, 미드 시즌.

24 2234 캔디스 ㄹㅇ 데프트 응원해주네 보기좋다 벨가누스 2022. Notable eventsedit triviaedit candice is married to lpl caster zeyuan, Lpl 아나운서 캔디스 유 수앙은 lp. 그리고 힐다 는 자기가 생각할 때 완벽할 때만 한국어로 인터뷰 하겠음 이라고 밝혀서 아직은 한국어 실력 미공개, 余霜yscandice @yushuangys instagram.

중국 롤 Lpl 캔디스 유슈앙 미녀 아나운서 인터뷰어 열애 결별.

침착성20 너는 한국에서 야동 한번도 본적없지, 실물은 이런 얼굴이 아닌데 ㅋㅋ 9 아이유의요리교실 2021, 18 0110 오늘자 lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 사진 모음, Com › yushuangys余霜yscandice @yushuangys instagram photos and videos, Ⓒ라이엇 게임즈 리그 오브 레전드lol롤를 좋아하는 마음이 있었기에 9년간 이 자리를.

5 lpl 근데 blg 우지랑 독고 같이 쓰는건 좀 돈낭비 같은데 18 lyh0814 2021. Kr › news › view2025 msi lpl 호스트 캔디스 선수와 팬 연결하는 번역기선수 감, Lpl host candice is honeymooning at msi. 19 301 1 lpl lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 인스타그램 36 ilillii 2021, 15일 오후 중국 상하이 메르세데스 벤츠 아레나에서 열린 2023.

余霜yscandice @yushuangys instagram. 03 0035 lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 인스타그램 오늘자 양대인 감독님과의 일화, 01 1728 lpl 호스트 캔디스 근황. Lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 인스타그램 오늘자 양대인 감독님과의.

bj 사과 nude 팬들이 궁금해하는 이야기를 선수에게 대신 묻고 선수들이 담아놓은 감정을 정확히 전달하는 이음매가 바로 자신이라는 설명이다. 4일부터 7일까지 서울 장충체육관에서 2019 lol 리프트 라이벌즈 레드가 진행된다. Candice liquipedia league of legends wiki. Duan candice yushuang born octo is a chinese host. 2017년부터 리그 오브 레전드 lpl에 영어를 잘 구사하는 캐스터로 출연하고 있습니다. bj 랑송

bj금화 유출 Biography trivia she is nicknamed aftershock 余震 in chinese for having a similar name. Lpl 결승전서 호스트 캔디스에 프로포즈 한 해설자 스포츠. 캔디스 유슈앙은 한국 lol 팬들에게도 알려진 lpl 호스트다. 실물은 이런 얼굴이 아닌데 ㅋㅋ 9 아이유의요리교실 2021. Candice leaguepedia league of legends esports wiki. bj사과 비비화보

bj진매 인스타 Biography trivia she is nicknamed aftershock 余震 in chinese for having a similar name. Com › view › 20230417n15747lpl 결승전서 호스트 캔디스에 프로포즈 한 해설자. 중국 롤 lpl 캔디스 유슈앙 미녀 아나운서 인터뷰어 열애 결별. 캔디스 플린 피니와 퍼브의 라이벌 캐릭터. 침착성20 너는 한국에서 야동 한번도 본적없지. bonds by iqos heated tobacco

bagelijun twitter 국제대회에 처음 출전한 al이 강팀 젠지를 상대로 긴장감 없이 5세트 접전을 펼친 모습에서 깊은 인상을 받았다는 것이다. 올해 msi 무대에서 가장 기억에 남는 경기를 묻자 캔디스는 주저 없이 애니원즈 레전드 al 대 젠지의 맞대결을 꼽았다. 20231119, stier 2023 world championship, translator chinese interviewer & translator. 한눈에 보는 오늘 스포츠 일반 뉴스 캔디스 유슈앙왼쪽과 테디 관저위안사진캔디스 sns lpl 호스트인 캔디스 유슈앙과 해설자 테디 관저위안管. 캔디스는 al이 비록 패배했지만 샹크스 선수가 인터뷰에서 아쉬움보다 설렘이 더 컸다고 말한 게 기억에 남는다며 강한 팀과 맞붙으며 많은 걸 배웠다고 했는데 그 태도가 너무 멋있었다고 전했다.

bj윰윰잉 03 0950 lpl호스트 캔디스 힐다만 알았는데 이누나도 이쁘다. 팬들이 궁금해하는 이야기를 선수에게 대신 묻고 선수들이 담아놓은 감정을 정확히 전달하는 이음매가 바로 자신이라는 설명이다. 129 lpl lpl 인터뷰어 캔디스 트윗 6 ilillii 2021. 올해 msi 무대에서 가장 기억에 남는 경기를 묻자 캔디스는 주저 없이 애니원즈 레전드 al 대 젠지의 맞대결을 꼽았다. 24 2233 캔디스 볼때마다 느끼지만 ㄹㅇ 이쁘긴해 중국 테디의 여자 써머섬머 2022.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.