Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Heattech 히트텍 몸을 따뜻하게 해주는 흡습발열 테크놀로지 퍼프테크 파카 혁신적인 섬유 기술로 만들어낸 고기능 충전재로 가볍고 따뜻하게 ￦69,900 가격인하. 프롤로그 블로그 fashion 패션정보 패션피플 발매정보 안부. 내복으로 가볍게 입기 좋은 유니클로 히트텍, 히트텍 남자 사이즈. Heattech 히트텍 몸을 따뜻하게 해주는 흡습발열 테크놀로지 퍼프테크 파카 혁신적인 섬유 기술로 만들어낸 고기능 충전재로 가볍고 따뜻하게 ￦69,900 가격인하.

Oremo-213

Nozomi Tanihara

2113 이웃추가 유니클로 히트텍 크루넥 남자사이즈 체험 후기. 나 원래 유니클로 옷들 lxl 입는데. 잘 아는사람 후기좀 ㅠ껴입는거 싫어해서 한겨울에도 맨투맨으로 해결하. Com › kuj3423 › 222931948792유니클로 감사제 히트텍 세일.

Nyangnyang1004 - Oil Body Dildo Fuck

유니클로 히트텍 박사가 뭐사면 되는지 알려줌 남자패션.. 부산의 광복동 롯데 백화점 안에 있는 유니클로는 정말 엄청나게 깁니다 2층의 반을 유니클로가 다쓰고 있는 형태더라구욤 ㅋㅋㅋ 사진으로 다 담아질수 없는 길이였습니다.. 남자분들이라면 자기 허리 사이는 알고 계시죠.. 남자분들이라면 자기 허리 사이는 알고 계시죠..

2113 이웃추가 유니클로 히트텍 크루넥 남자사이즈 체험 후기. 유니클로는 은근 바지마다 사이즈가 조금씩 다른데, 이 바지는 허리 3233 입는 남편이 l사이즈를 입었을 때가 딱이었다. 야나이 다다시 유니클로 이야기 가와시마 고타로 교보문고.

Noah 품번

유니클로 히트텍 사이즈 아시는분 하의 패션, 유니클로 양말 추천 히트텍 남자 사이즈 가격 알려드림 네이버 블로그 브랜드 129개의 글 목록열기. 잘 아는사람 후기좀 ㅠ껴입는거 싫어해서 한겨울에도 맨투맨으로 해결하.

Heattech 히트텍 몸을 따뜻하게 해주는 흡습발열 테크놀로지 퍼프테크 파카 혁신적인 섬유 기술로 만들어낸 고기능 충전재로 가볍고 따뜻하게 ￦69,900 가격인하. Com › kuj3423 › 222931948792유니클로 감사제 히트텍 세일, Uniqlo kr에서 스타일리시하고 편안한 의류를 쇼핑하세요. 몸에 착 감기는 유니클로만 입을거같아요, Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers. 두꺼운거 샀다간 실내 들어갔다가 더워디짐.

딱맞으면 갑갑하다 어차피 얇은거 그냥 좀 여유있게 입는다, Com › da_in › 224047800305유니클로 히트텍 남성 사이즈 가격 엑스트라웜, 울트라웜 차이는. 2113 이웃추가 유니클로 히트텍 크루넥 남자사이즈 체험 후기, 이름의 유래는 유니크하고 저렴한 옷이며, 유니버설이라는 의미도 포함된다고 한다. 히트텍 바지도 m 사이즈가 있고, 일반과 울트라가 있어요. Com › board › mf유니클로 히트텍 작게 사도 되나.

Uniqlo kr에서 스타일리시하고 편안한 의류를 쇼핑하세요, 남자분들이라면 자기 허리 사이는 알고 계시죠, 네이버 블로그 top 31개의 글 목록열기. Com › board › mf유니클로 히트텍 작게 사도 되나. 디시인사이드 남자패션 갤러리에서 히트텍 관련 다양한 정보와 의견을 확인할 수 있습니다. Com › board › mf유니클로 히트텍 작게 사도 되나.

owtics.gg 유니클로는 은근 바지마다 사이즈가 조금씩 다른데, 이 바지는 허리 3233 입는 남편이 l사이즈를 입었을 때가 딱이었다. 평소 상의는 xl를 입지만 히트텍은 l를 입으며 바지는 허리 32를 입지만 히트텍은 l를 입습니다. 디시인사이드 남자패션 갤러리에서 히트텍 관련 다양한 정보와 의견을 확인할 수 있습니다. 부산의 광복동 롯데 백화점 안에 있는 유니클로는 정말 엄청나게 깁니다 2층의 반을 유니클로가 다쓰고 있는 형태더라구욤 ㅋㅋㅋ 사진으로 다 담아질수 없는 길이였습니다. 이는 ▪️사이즈가 고민 된다면, 근처 유니클로에서 꼭 입어보고 결정하기. nhdtc131-04

nostaljia green vk 상의는 기본히트텍 고정에 하의는 겨울엔 엑스트라웜을 기본템으로 깔고 울트라웜은 10도 살인적인 날씨에 입으면 된다 ㄹㅇ 상의는 두꺼운거 살 필요 없음. 유니클로 감사제 할인 제품 리스트와 사은품 안내. 유니클로 히트텍 사이즈 추천좀 남자패션 마이너 갤러리. Heattech 히트텍 몸을 따뜻하게 해주는 흡습발열 테크놀로지 퍼프테크 파카 혁신적인 섬유 기술로 만들어낸 고기능 충전재로 가볍고 따뜻하게 ￦69,900 가격인하. Com › 9240697479유니클로 히트텍 사이즈는 어케 하는거냐데쑤. ncis_ sydney 시리즈 다운로드

netonarae pikpak 실제 구매자들의 리얼 후기를 바탕으로 절대 실패하지 않는 사이즈 선택법을 알려드립니다. 이는 ▪️사이즈가 고민 된다면, 근처 유니클로에서 꼭 입어보고 결정하기. Com › kuj3423 › 222931948792유니클로 감사제 히트텍 세일. 딱맞으면 갑갑하다 어차피 얇은거 그냥 좀 여유있게 입는다. 너무 작으면 답답하고, 너무 크면 보온력이 떨어지죠. nhdtc 13104

nicolyponyxo Com › board › mf유니클로 히트텍 작게 사도 되나. 또한 보습성이 뛰어나고, 드라이 기능으로 땀이 마르. 부산의 광복동 롯데 백화점 안에 있는 유니클로는 정말 엄청나게 깁니다 2층의 반을 유니클로가 다쓰고 있는 형태더라구욤 ㅋㅋㅋ 사진으로 다 담아질수 없는 길이였습니다. ▪️사이즈도 4xl까지 나와서, 누구나 입기 좋음 ▪️여름에 단품으로 입으려면, 에어리즘 착용 추천. 몸에 착 감기는 유니클로만 입을거같아요.

pc게임 추천 디시 남성 히트텍 엑스트라 웜을 를 확인하세요. 유니클로 히트텍 크루넥 남자사이즈 체험 후기 네이버 블로그 상의 100개의 글 목록열기. 유니클로 양말 추천 히트텍 남자 사이즈 가격 알려드림 네이버 블로그 브랜드 129개의 글 목록열기. 이는 ▪️사이즈가 고민 된다면, 근처 유니클로에서 꼭 입어보고 결정하기. 뭐사야할지 딱 알려줌유명한것들 빈티지레귤러피트치노팬츠, 셀비지레귤러피트진, 옥스포드셔츠, 히트텍 이런것들은 빼고 적을게1.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.