Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지원은 데뷔 전에 인터넷 패션 쇼핑몰 소녀나라의 모델로 활동했으며, 2017년 굿데이라는 그룹으로 처음 데뷔했습니다. 시그니처 픽 바드의 활약에 힘입어 마지막 3세트를 가져가면서 4승 무패를 완성했다. ㅇㅎ 자꾸 흘러내리는 시그니처 지원gif 유머움짤이슈. Url 복사 이웃추가 🎤 시그니처 지원, 그녀의 모든 것.

Fc2 보지

3kg3, o형, 235mm 가족부모님, 남동생2001년생학력서울충무초등학교 졸업덕수중학교 졸업덕수고등학교 디지털경영과 졸업4소속사c9 엔터테인먼트소속 그룹, 29일 소속사 c9엔터테인먼트는 시그니처 지원이 주넥슨대표 이정헌의 인기. Url 복사 이웃추가 🎤 시그니처 지원, 그녀의 모든 것. Video player is loading. 걸그룹 시그니처 cignature가 2년 연속 초대형 뮤직 페스티벌인 ‘2024 카스쿨 페스티벌 casscool festival’에 출연하게 되어 팬들과 대중의 이목이 집중되고 있습니다. 그룹은 원래 굿데이의 일부 멤버들과 새로운 인물들을 결합하여 c9 girlz로 알려져 있었으나, 나중에 시그니처로 이름을 바꿨다.

Fc2 Ppv

조회 수 413794 ㅇㅎ 시그니처 지원 뮤비. Url 복사 이웃추가 🎤 시그니처 지원, 그녀의 모든 것. 조회 수 529979 추천 수 299 댓글 295, 오는 5일 경기 고양시 킨텍스 야외 글로벌 스테이지에서 ‘워터밤 서울 2024’ 이하 ‘워터밤’가 개최되는 가운데, 시그니처 지원이 게스트로 출연해서 화제가 되고 있습니다, 걸그룹 시그니처cignature 지원이 특급 화제성을 입증했다.

Fanza Awards

3kg3, o형, 235mm 가족부모님, 남동생2001년생학력서울충무초등학교 졸업덕수중학교 졸업덕수고등학교 디지털경영과 졸업4소속사c9 엔터테인먼트소속 그룹. 팬싸인회에서 신나게 뛰는 시그니처 지원gif, 걸그룹 시그니처의 멤버 김지원을 응원하는 갤러리입니다 지원시그니처 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

시그니처 픽 바드의 활약에 힘입어 마지막 3세트를 가져가면서 4승 무패를 완성했다. 브런치작가,여행, 글, 그림, 문화, 공연, 전시, 맛집, 카페, 미국생활read more, 시그니처cignature는 2020년 2월 4일에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 걸그룹이다, 초대 선미 feat구찌수영복 2대 권은비 순수피지컬 3대 시그니처 지원 압도적인 무력 워터밤으로 성공해야 앞으로 계속 인재가 등용된다 힘을 내자. 걸그룹 시그니처 cignature가 2년 연속 초대형 뮤직 페스티벌인 ‘2024 카스쿨 페스티벌 casscool festival’에 출연하게 되어 팬들과 대중의 이목이 집중되고 있습니다.

Fc2 리뷰

소녀나라가 운영하고 있는 유튜브 채널에서 시그니처 지원의 노래 영상을 올려주기도 하고 홍보해 주기도 했습니다 현재는 비공개 2017년에는 굿데이로 데뷔했고 2020년에는 시그니처로 데뷔를 했습니다 포지션은 센터, 리드보컬입니다 시그니처 지원 워터밤.. 시그니처cignature는 2020년 2월 4일에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 걸그룹이다.. 오늘은 시그니처 cignature의 멤버 지원에 대해 알아보는 시간을 가져볼게요.. 걸그룹 시그니처의 멤버 지원 걸그룹 시그니처의 멤버 지원은 최근 워터밤 서울 2024에서 눈부신 활약을 펼쳤습니다..

걸그룹 시그니처 cignature 지원이 ‘워터밤’에 뜬다, 2004년부터 2010년까지 수원 삼성 블루윙즈 감독을 맡았다, 굿데이는 2020년 해체되었고, 지원은, 3kg3, o형, 235mm 가족부모님, 남동생2001년생학력서울충무초등학교 졸업덕수중학교 졸업덕수고등학교 디지털경영과 졸업4소속사c9 엔터테인먼트소속 그룹. 유튜브 노빠꾸탁재훈 프로그램에서 일본 성인 배우인 오구라 유나로부터 av에 데뷔하라는 이야기를 듣고 논란이 생기면서 대중적 관심도가 높아진 탓이다. 초대남 지원 해봅니다 머릿속엔그생각뿐 20240825 이 돼지좀 그만 빨아줘라 진짜 살면서 여자본적도 없는새끼들인가 일반인중에도 얘보다 훨 슬림하면서 얼굴이쁘고 가슴은 더큰애들 많은데 왜 저런 통통한년을 띄우는거냐 병신같은 페미새끼 메카고질라 20240825.

Fc2 Ppv 2589532

캐니언의 분전 이겨낸 젠지, 기적의 역전. 그룹은 원래 굿데이의 일부 멤버들과 새로운 인물들을 결합하여 c9 girlz로 알려져 있었으나, 나중에 시그니처로 이름을 바꿨다, 지원 소속사 c9 엔터테인먼트는 21일 소셜 미디어에 노빠꾸 탁재훈의 다나카 & 오구라유나 편에서 발생한 논란과 관련해 송출 당일 지원과 장, 시그니처 지원 유튜브 라방하다가 꽁꽁 얼어붙은 한강위로.

안방1열 직캠4k 시그니처 지원 아싸 cignature jee won assa fancam @sbs inkigayo_2020. 걸그룹 시그니처cignature 지원이 특급 화제성을 입증했다. 시그니처 지원 유튜브 라방하다가 꽁꽁 얼어붙은 한강위로. 전 시그니처 지원 41 동영상 첨부파일, 지원은 데뷔 전에 인터넷 패션 쇼핑몰 소녀나라의 모델로 활동했으며, 2017년 굿데이라는 그룹으로 처음 데뷔했습니다. 포텐 ㅇㅎ 자꾸 흘러내리는 시그니처 지원gif.

fc2 왁싱 Com › 7133786484ㅇㅎ 자꾸 흘러내리는 시그니처 지원gif 유머움짤이슈 에펨코. Com › 108시그니처 지원 콘서트 드라마 최신 움짤 모음. 시그니처 지원 이력 시그니처 지원 1999년 4월 1일 서울에서 태어난 걸그룹 시그니처의 멤버입니다. 본명김지원출생1999년 4월 1일부산광역시 금정구신체166cm, 51. 그녀의 매력 포인트와 활동, 그리고 재미있는 이야기까지 하나씩 풀어볼까요. fapello

fc2 ppv 4723700 missav redirect 지원cignature. 지원은 dj 제트비zb, 에이션ation과 함께 edm 곡 eternal time으로 합동 무대를 선보이며 라이징 서머퀸으로서의 존재감을 드러냈습니다. 지원은 dj 제트비zb, 에이션ation과 함께 edm 곡 eternal time으로 합동 무대를 선보이며 라이징 서머퀸으로서의 존재감을 드러냈습니다. 지원은 j9 엔터테인먼트 소속 걸그룹 시그니처cignature 의 멤버입니다. 걸그룹 시그니처 cignature 지원이 ‘워터밤’에 뜬다. fc21619668

fc2-ppv-3825293 배우 2004년부터 2010년까지 수원 삼성 블루윙즈 감독을 맡았다. 그녀는 뛰어난 보컬과 댄스 실력, 그리고 사랑스러운 비주얼로 팬들의 마음을 사로잡고 있죠. 1세트 선픽을 선택한 bnk 피어엑스가 제이스를 경기결과 기자 신연재. 걸그룹 시그니처 멤버인 지원이 걸그룹 개인 트렌드지수에서 뉴진스의 하니를 꺾고 1위에 올랐다. 3kg3, o형, 235mm 가족부모님, 남동생2001년생학력서울충무초등학교 졸업덕수중학교 졸업덕수고등학교 디지털경영과 졸업4소속사c9 엔터테인먼트소속 그룹. fapello.xom

fc2 材質 wifi 시그니처cignature는 2020년 2월 4일에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 걸그룹이다. 16 움짤 제임스딘 조회50209 추천56. 시그니처cignature는 2020년 2월 4일에 데뷔한 대한민국의 7인조 걸그룹이다. 12 1656 자신의 장점을 적극적으로 활용할 줄 아는 모습이 아름답네요 1. Com 시그니처지원워터밤 워터밤지원 시그니처지원 시그니처지원나이 시그니처지원키 시그니처지원나무위.

fc2ppv3126833 16 움짤 제임스딘 조회50209 추천56. 시그니처 지원은 눈누난나, 아싸, 오로라, 안녕 인사해 등의 노래로 인기를 얻었습니다. 조회 수 457535 추천 수 468 댓글 275. 조회 수 529979 추천 수 299 댓글 295. 팬싸인회에서 신나게 뛰는 시그니처 지원gif.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.