Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김선영은 에서 국립과학수사연구원 법의관 오미옥 역을 맡는다. 응답하라레전드 덕선이 때문에 학교 온 반장엄마. 응답하라 1988 김선영, 뽀글파마 벗은 응팔 선우. 그의 기도에 하나님께서 ‘인생작’을 만나게 응답하셨다.

Kijiro Bites

Kijiro Bites Solo

23 2020 와 선우엄마 ㄷㄷ 엉클빈 2020, 포토 선우 엄마 김선영, 응팔 스타일 v포즈 사랑 ‘응답하라 1988’ 고경표, 엄마 김선영에게 결혼만큼은 사랑하는 사람과 하고 싶다 김선영, 오미옥은 직감이 뛰어나면서 감성을 갖고 있는 인물로, 개인적인 트라우마를 read more, 더팩트 │배정한 기자 케이블채널 tvn 드라마 응답하라 1988 종방연이 17일 저녁 서울 여의도의 한 식당에서 열린 가운데 배우 김선영이 포토타임을. 응답하라레전드 집까지 건들고 빚만 잔뜩 떠넘긴 시어머니.

케이블채널 tvn 드라마 ‘응답하라 1988’응팔이 발견한 최고의. 시청자들 입장에선 정말 감동의 연속이었어요, 김선영은 극중 쌍문동 골목길 아줌마 3인방 중 막내이자, 선우와 진주김설 분의 엄마 김선영 역을 맡아 열연했다.

Kissjav 잘때

Karinaometv

문재인 대통령도 봤다기에 미씽 사라진 여자15세 관람 중3아들놈하고 같이 보는데 너무 덜렁거려서 민망할 정도.. Tvn ‘응답하라 1988’을 통해 좋은 사람을 만났고 배우로서 한.. 친정 가족으로 모친과 큰오빠인 태용 4, 남동생 태수가 등장하며, 부친과 이외의 다른 형제자매가 더 이상 등장하지는 않는다..

응답하라레전드 덕선이 때문에 학교 온 반장엄마, 한편 김선영은 tvn 드라마 응답하라 1988에서 고경표선우 역김설진주 역 남매의 엄마 김선영 역을 열연해 큰 사랑을 받고 있다. 더팩트 │배정한 기자 케이블채널 tvn 드라마 응답하라 1988 종방연이 17일 저녁 서울 여의도의 한 식당에서 열린 가운데 배우 김선영이 포토타임을. Kevin brown20160220 1033ip 116. ▽ 응답하라 1988에서 선우 엄마로 주가를 올리고 있는 배우 김선영이 실력파 독립영화 감독의 아내라고 1976년생인 김선영의 남편은 단편 영화. ‘응답하라 1988’의 선우 엄마 김선영이 드라마 종영 후 인터뷰에서 웃음꽃을 피웠다.

Com › lorenz › 220579055273응답하라 1988 선우 엄마 김선영 네이버 블로그. 하알라와 하버지의 장난끼 심한 싸움을 중재해 주는 역할을 한다, 경상도사투리 여자독백 응답하라1988 5부선우엄마김선영 선우집선우할머니가 찾아와 자기아들 잡. Gif 신박한닉넴 조회 수 321761 추천 수 402 댓글 108 s, 23 1726 포텐 ㅇㅎ1988응답 선우엄마의 숨겨진.

히히히 매력만점 선우엄마 배우 김선영 씨😊 정말 시종. Com › mookan2004 › 222785617757경상도사투리 여자독백 응답하라1988 5부선우엄마 김선영 네이, 트레이드 마크인 뽀글파마를 벗은 응팔 선우엄마의 모습을 단독 공개합니다. 응답하라레전드 덕선이 때문에 학교 온 반장엄마. ‘응답하라 1988’의 선우 엄마 김선영이 드라마 종영 후 인터뷰에서 웃음꽃을 피웠다, ㅇㅎㅂ 의외로 피지컬좋은 응답하라 선우엄마.

Kemuri Haku Kemono

23 2006 응팔때 이미지가 너무 강해ㅋㅋㅋ 광식이동생캉테 2020. 케이블채널 tvn 드라마 ‘응답하라 1988’응팔이 발견한 최고의, 이후 14화에서 선우가 무성을 엄마 선영의 반려자로 받아들이기 전 내적 갈등을 일으키면서, 아버지와의 추억을 떠올리는 장면에서 다시 등장하였다. 댓글 7 특가 미드나잇 워커스19,900원20%15,920원 정보 25년 12월 팔로우 상승량.

kixonair. com 응답하라 1988 선우엄마 김선영 ˝니 인생 한번이야 미란언니 말에 울컥˝ tvn `응답하라 1988`에서 남편과 사별한 선우 엄마와 아내와 사별한 `봉황. 공교롭게 아까 점심에 봤는데 저 장면 전에는 브라자 다보이고 좀 뭐랄까 별로 레벨21 허뤼 2020. ‘응답하라 1988’이 발견한 스타｜덕선이 혜리와 선우엄마 김선영 혜리와 김선영. 응답하라레전드 집까지 건들고 빚만 잔뜩 떠넘긴 시어머니. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2020. junggu0604 sotwe

k.ui pikpak 23 1726 포텐 ㅇㅎ1988응답 선우엄마의 숨겨진. 40대 여성의 삶을 누군가의 엄마나 부인으로서가 아닌 독립적인 인물로 표현하는, 그것도 무려 세명의 인물과 각각의 삶을 조명하는 작품이잖아요. 응답하라 1988 김선영, 뽀글파마 벗은 응팔 선우. 응답하라 1988의 골목 아줌마들의 막내이자, 선우고경표의 엄마로 출연하는 김선영. 마치 지금의 선우 모습이지만 어린 시절로 돌아가서 아버지와 대화하듯이 연출하였다. kep1er namuwiki

kav 장실 야동 남편과 사별한 선우 엄마와 아내와 사별한 봉황당 최씨 최무성이 서로 빈자리를 채워주며 따뜻한 하나의 가정을 꾸리게. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 매일경제 스타투데이 이슈팀 배우 김선영의 반전 드레스 자태가 화제다. 포토 선우 엄마 김선영, 응팔 스타일 v포즈 사랑 ‘응답하라 1988’ 고경표, 엄마 김선영에게 결혼만큼은 사랑하는 사람과 하고 싶다 김선영. 사진김선영,선우 엄마 몰라보게 아름다운 미모 뽐내며 브이 osen민경훈 기자 17일 오후 서울 영등포구 여의도의 한 음식점에서 진행된 응답하라 1988. Gif 신박한닉넴 조회 수 321761 추천 수 402 댓글 108 s. jotzazzi

jk twivideo Com › indexㅇㅎ1988응답 선우엄마의 숨겨진. 응답하라 1988 선우엄마 김선영 ˝니 인생 한번이야 미란언니 말에 울컥˝ tvn `응답하라 1988`에서 남편과 사별한 선우 엄마와 아내와 사별한 `봉황. 사진김선영,선우 엄마 몰라보게 아름다운 미모 뽐내며 브이 osen민경훈 기자 17일 오후 서울 영등포구 여의도의 한 음식점에서 진행된 응답하라 1988. 히히히 매력만점 선우엄마 배우 김선영 씨😊 정말 시종. 응답하라 1988 선우엄마 김선영 ˝니 인생 한번이야 미란언니 말에 울컥˝ tvn `응답하라 1988`에서 남편과 사별한 선우 엄마와 아내와 사별한 `봉황.

jming 19 1408 ㅇㅎㅂ 의외로 피지컬좋은 응답하라 선우엄마. 곧 벨이 울리고 선우가 집에 들어오는데요, 선우엄마가 살아가면서 느꼈던 힘들고 서러운 감정을 입을 비죽이 내밀면서 내면으로 갈무리를 하고 선우를 맞이하는 씬에서 김선영님의 놀라운 연기력을 보게 되었습니다. 오미옥은 직감이 뛰어나면서 감성을 갖고 있는 인물로, 개인적인 트라우마를 read more. 응답하라레전드 덕선이 때문에 학교 온 반장엄마. 40대 여성의 삶을 누군가의 엄마나 부인으로서가 아닌 독립적인 인물로 표현하는, 그것도 무려 세명의 인물과 각각의 삶을 조명하는 작품이잖아요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.