Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

좋지않은 날씨에도 많은 분들이 찾아주셨어 북적거리는 모습 보니까 경남에 대한 사랑이 막 샘솟아서 눈물이 차올라서 고갤 들어 오타쿠특. 05 205 0 14685 일반 내신 1. 어떤 정도가 너무 과도해진 탓에 뭔가 이상해져 버리는 순간 또는 주객전도가 오는 시점 등으로 이해할 수 있겠다. 4 임 수상내역이나 교외활동을 여러가지 많이 해놓았고 생기부는 독서기록장 있는등 자신있는편이긴 한데 다문화 가정 사회통합전형 쓸까 고민중에 있기는한데 특성화고가 학생부로 일반고랑 비빌수있을지도 확신이.

학급석차 중위권 ㅋ dc official app.. Zip 무한도전⏱오분순삭 mbc100911방송.. 25정도고 성취도 다 a고 생기부12장정도임학교에서 일반교과 등급나오는거는 수학만 3년째 나오고 다른과목 대부분 1학년때만 등급나옴프로그래밍 배우고싶어서 컴공과 지원할 예정인데 학.. 모고 877558 나옴 내신은 우리과 1등에다가 전교권인데 이거 맞음..

@cd_ttop Porn

@donottrythisath

난 공고를 졸업한 사람으로써 다른건 몰라도 내신이랑 출결은 신경 썼으면 좋겠어.. 청주 24시간 뼈해장국 수곡동 고박사 아침식사 후기.. 직캠 보고서🔍 문득 네가 들리면, 고갤 돌리면, 맘이 떨리면.. 원하는학교는 한강미디어고등학교고 중학교때 성적은 30% 안팎으로 기억함..

기계공학과인데 좆같이어려워서 자살마렵다 후배님들아 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다, 2025년도 주장으로써 여름 합숙 종료, 05 228 3 14688 질문 특성화고에서 인문계로 2. 039 상여자 특 스릴러 잘 봄 2022. 고졸공기업 마이너 갤러리 특고갤 왜케 번화했냐.

신입생입학 할때처럼 면접보거나 자소서같은거 작성해야하나, 05 198 0 14685 일반 내신 1, 4 임 수상내역이나 교외활동을 여러가지 많이 해놓았고 생기부는 독서기록장 있는등 자신있는편이긴 한데 다문화 가정 사회통합전형 쓸까 고민중에 있기는한데 특성화고가 학생부로 일반고랑 비빌수있을지도 확신이. 다담주 연수간다지방 광역시 중심지쪽 살고있는데 7월부터 서울에서 일해야함 솔직히 홍대 건대 이태원 강남 아닌이상 우리, 동양미래 인천폴리텍 부천대 생각중 4갠뭐쓰지 dc official app, 어떤 정도가 너무 과도해진 탓에 뭔가 이상해져 버리는 순간 또는 주객전도가 오는 시점 등으로 이해할 수 있겠다.

어떤 정도가 너무 과도해진 탓에 뭔가 이상해져 버리는 순간 또는 주객전도가 오는 시점 등으로 이해할 수 있겠다. 이쯤해서 다시보는 작년 말올초에 화제였던 최강의 갤리인 특오갤 한국명 개량 경량 오스만 갤리온입니다보조돛이 4개 달리는 로나갤 상위버전의 배입니다 언제가 될지는 모르지만 올해 기대해봅니다, Zip 무한도전⏱오분순삭 mbc100911방송.

Ahoo._.08 知恵袋

05 215 3 14688 질문 특성화고에서 인문계로 2, 05 169 0 14685 일반 내신 1, Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다.

05 238 3 14688 질문 특성화고에서 인문계로 2, Zip 무한도전⏱오분순삭 mbc100911방송, 이라 상황극을 할 땐, 하오는 고갤 돌려 그쪽을 보면서 미소 지었음. 난 공고를 졸업한 사람으로써 다른건 몰라도 내신이랑 출결은 신경 썼으면 좋겠어, 05 191 3 14688 질문 특성화고에서 인문계로 1.

ahoo sex 내신은 딱 3이라재직자 전형 경쟁률 1. Com › mgallery › board본인 아포공고졸업후 금오공대다니는중인데 어려워 특성화고 마이너. 다담주 연수간다지방 광역시 중심지쪽 살고있는데 7월부터 서울에서 일해야함 솔직히 홍대 건대 이태원 강남 아닌이상 우리. 전 근데 개오갤 유저라 슬퍼요 아직나오면 복귀할래요 트박까면서 ㅋㅋ. 1학년인데 언제부터 전학 신청같은거 가능. ai to namida hitomi.la

574nds-004 missav 다담주 연수간다지방 광역시 중심지쪽 살고있는데 7월부터 서울에서 일해야함 솔직히 홍대 건대 이태원 강남 아닌이상 우리. 고졸공기업 마이너 갤러리 특고갤 왜케 번화했냐. 순서는 상단 좌측에서 우측으로 한 단씩 내려가며, 각 마이너 갤러리는 가나다순, abc순, 123순. 우리는 친구칭긔🤭 담엔 부스까지 야무지게 해볼게용. 직캠 보고서🔍 문득 네가 들리면, 고갤 돌리면, 맘이 떨리면. accommodation업체 발렌시아가

99일 핵 스크립트 우리는 친구칭긔🤭 담엔 부스까지 야무지게 해볼게용. 05 191 3 14688 질문 특성화고에서 인문계로 1. 아닌 학교도 있겠지만 솔직히 벼락치기 좀만해도 과1등 먹을 수 있잖아. 오네쇼타는 히토미태그중 가장 우수하며 이는 과학적으로. 하지만 실상은 100%에 거의 육박하는. 99나이트

aartofzoo 05 198 0 14685 일반 내신 1. 25정도고 성취도 다 a고 생기부12장정도임학교에서 일반교과 등급나오는거는 수학만 3년째 나오고 다른과목 대부분 1학년때만 등급나옴프로그래밍 배우고싶어서 컴공과 지원할 예정인데 학. Com › mgallery › board일반고에서 특성화고로 전학 질문 특성화고 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board작년 지역인재 9급 합격자다 너넨 하지마라 특성화고 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board특전 정시 등급 특성화고 마이너 갤러리.

4798037 이름 Kr › board › dho대항해시대 인벤 이쯤에서 다시보는 특오갤 대항해시대 인벤 자유. 학급석차 중위권 ㅋ dc official app. 05 205 0 14685 일반 내신 1. 학급석차 중위권 ㅋ dc official app. 특고압 체리 1146 20180901 고갤 스타리그 c조 8강 2차전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.