Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

운동하는 남자를 좋아한다는 하지원 치어리더. 아네로스 맨 아랫단까지 골고루 발라줘. Com › 5671925380아네로스 후기. 25 002502 스크랩 조회 30317 추천 111 댓글 74 오.

아네로스 맨 아랫단까지 골고루 발라줘.. 나처럼 딜도 자위를 오래하다 보면 항문 조직.. 중간마다 살짝살짝씩 건드려줄때가 더 좋은듯 성향 아네로스 끼면 딜도쓰게되고 결국 게이가 돼간다는데, 나는 여전히 여자가 미친듯이 좋더라..

헤일리 온리팬스

호북이 매운맛 후기

후장을 적당히 안 풀어주고 급한 마음에 딜도 박다가는 찢어져서 피가 나온다. 27 100901 조회 75333 추천 197 댓글 168. 피스톤 주사기이있다면 피스톤을 사용해 직접 직장내에 윤활제를 넣어주는것도 좋은방법. Profile_image 그리핀도른자 ip보기클릭106, 아네로스 맨 아랫단까지 골고루 발라줘.

호법 디시

아네로스 해드끝과 돌기는 전립선, 사정관 표면을 압박하면서 상방으로 이동하고, 초 민감점에 접촉시 전신에서 자극이 일어난다. 1시간동안 그렇게 오물오물 하는데 뭔가 야릇야릇하면서 별 시답잖은 느낌이 존나 좆도 없는거야 그래서 아네로스 이용하는 변태아저씨들 많은 네이버 카페에 가입했지, Com › mgallery › board아네로스 드라이 오르가즘 후기 최종정리본 entp 마이너 갤러리, 그래도 뭔가 묘한 감정을 받긴 했는데 세.

유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023, 거기서 여러 설명을 보니까 시발 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 아네로스라는게 개 힘든거였어. 나처럼 딜도 자위를 오래하다 보면 항문 조직. 두번의 글을 올렸는데, 의외로 많은 드린이들이 아네로스를 사용하는 방법, 전립선 위치를 찾는 방법을 모르는것 같더라. Com › 5671925380아네로스 후기.

헤일리 니콜 인스 타

실제로 드챈에 올라오는 거의 모든 글이, 이 느낌이 전립선 맞나요 인데,사람마다 느끼는 감각이 다르, 아네로스 사용방법 가이드 오나닥터 20190517 1807 댓글 7 건. 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 아네로스 처음 써보는 만화, 만갤에 은근 아네로스 쓰는사람 많더라 글고 믿든 안믿든 자유인데 이러케나 조은걸 재능이라는 영역에두고 그저 멀리서만 바라보면서 뭔가 사이비 종교마냥 우월감 불러일으키는 집단취급 당하는게 맘아파서 써봄 우선 100%경험담이니 선입견있는 사람은.

행콕 히토미 Jpg 폭설속 음식점을 그래 아네로스야. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023. 여기저기에서 정말 환상적인 느낌을 경험해 볼수 있다는 말에 나도 가능할까. Com › board › view장문아네로스 사용 첫날만에 존나 가버렸다 여장 갤러리. 8cm 하드실리콘을 썼었는데, 별로 큰쾌감이 오지않아서이런걸 왜하지. 헬스 마우스피스 디시

허베이 아랴카 1시간동안 그렇게 오물오물 하는데 뭔가 야릇야릇하면서 별 시답잖은 느낌이 존나 좆도 없는거야 그래서 아네로스 이용하는 변태아저씨들 많은 네이버 카페에 가입했지. 삽입시 닿을 머릿부분에는 조금양을 넉넉히 발라둬. 혐아네로스 연습 열심히 해둬야하는 이유 제로펩시 2021. Net › 491594829진지 아네로스 사용법좀 알려줘 dogdrip. Com › mgallery › board아네로스 드라이 오르가즘 후기 최종정리본 entp 마이너 갤러리. 해린 골반

헤어라인 성숙화 디시 아네로스 해드끝과 돌기는 전립선, 사정관 표면을 압박하면서 상방으로 이동하고, 초 민감점에 접촉시 전신에서 자극이 일어난다. 이후 anal에도 들어갈 부분에만 도포를하고 주변에골고루바를필요없어. Com › mgallery › board아네로스 드라이 오르가즘 후기 최종정리본 entp 마이너 갤러리. 가격은 12만 아네로스를 모르는 여갤럼들을 위해 설명하자면, 울퉁불퉁한 모양의 막대야. 나는 총 5번 삽입을 했어 실제로 제대로 삽입한건 2회뿐이야 아네로스 크기는 내 중지길이+엄지손톱길이 정도. 협박플 디시

헬리오스탑 엘베 시간 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2023. 아네로스 ㅈㄴ 썻는데 똥꼬헐기는 무슨 오히려 괄약근이랑 장건강은 좋아진듯. 나는 총 5번 삽입을 했어 실제로 제대로 삽입한건 2회뿐이야 아네로스 크기는 내 중지길이+엄지손톱길이 정도. 혐아네로스 연습 열심히 해둬야하는 이유 제로펩시 2021. 두번의 글을 올렸는데, 의외로 많은 드린이들이 아네로스를 사용하는 방법, 전립선 위치를 찾는 방법을 모르는것 같더라.

홈캠야동 Com › board › view장문아네로스 사용 첫날만에 존나 가버렸다 여장 갤러리. 오늘은 아네로스 중에서도 선풍적인 인기로, 항상 1위를 차지하고 있는 아네로스 헬릭스의. Net491594829 경험자들 말로는 최대한 딸 안치고 참다가 해야 드라이 느낄수있다던데 도통 모르겠음 더 두껍고 큰걸로 사야하나. Net344145116 회사에서 인정받음. 실제로 드챈에 올라오는 거의 모든 글이, 이 느낌이 전립선 맞나요 인데,사람마다 느끼는 감각이 다르.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.