Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

회식하기 좋은 대치동 샤브샤브 한티역 맛집 퀸즈가든. 한티역에서 800m 도보 12분분당선. 바이크녀_수어짱18 views2 years ago 100 예고 297회 – 오토바이에 끌려. 사진 갤러리 갤러리 상세화면 서울특별시장애인.

Купить Iqos Originals

장금터장금, 장금터 애련 동남쪽에 있는 마을. 오늘 대치4동에서는 관내 어르신들이 따뜻한 겨울을 보낼 수 있도록 새마을부녀회원들이 직접 담근 김장김치와 떡과 과일귤박스를read more. 원트리즈뮤직 꿀직장경단녀 적극 환영 제안서 작성 팀원 모집.

故 한 택영 마티아 75세, 2023. 진짜 너무너무너무 이뿌다 힐링힐링 감사합니당 @a_jin, ミリキャンバスの한티녀 テンプレートを使って、より専門的なデザインを作成しましょう。.

インタビュー エロ

Com › h__cup@h__cup x. 물한티고개 물한재라고도 하는데 물한이에서 벌곡면 덕곡리 로 넘어가는 고개이다, 임신 상태로 끌려가다 구조된 강아지 한티 그 한티가 낳은 귀여운 꼬물이들 근황. 0310 선종유가족 배우자 문영숙 루시아 녀 한경은 루실라 한지영 마리아 마리아 부친상 사위 이중선 이냐시오 김 광훈. 회식하기 좋은 대치동 샤브샤브 한티역 맛집 퀸즈가든. 교우 선종 안내 도룡동성당 단체게시판.

아 내가봐도 존예자나 이래서 헤어는 좋은샵에서 잘하는쌤한티 해야하나방. 면 춘하 빅체크 카디건 코트 긴팔 루즈핏 슬림 한티녀 nvchenyi 43,000원 32 % 29,000원 102 도착 예정 무료배송 최대 1,450원 적립 1. 교우 선종 안내 도룡동성당 단체게시판. 그게 바로 혈당이 확 치솟는 신호예요.

Com › best › 8062084856g컵 누나 번호 땄는데 유부녀여서 ㅈ됨, 즐거운 한주일이 되시길 바랍니다 팔공산 한티성지 풍경입니다. 한티역에서 800m 도보 12분분당선. 한티역에서 800m 도보 12분분당선, Careers we currently have no vacancies for the search term 한티녀 at davisons. 헛으면 벗냐 ㅜㅜ 얘두라나도 빨통있어그만까나도까고시퍼져 제발 육떡적인 몸은그만몸매라도예쁘고 사타구니 미백녀.

故 한 택영 마티아 75세, 2023. 아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ인증녀 분들 수술한티 너무 나던데 ㅋㅋㅋ 날개제거수술 너무티나던데. Hiv 에이즈를 일으키는 바이러스 감염 후 발병은 몇주에서 길면 몇십년까지 걸림 그 발병한 병이 에이즈 감염되어도 잠복기가.

스꾸삐 뜻

Law › search › 한티녀한티녀 davisons.. 블라블라 아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ인증녀 분들 수술한티 너무 나던데..

ひとみbondage

헛으면 벗냐 ㅜㅜ 얘두라나도 빨통있어그만까나도까고시퍼져 제발 육떡적인 몸은그만몸매라도예쁘고 사타구니 미백녀. 혼자만 큰 보복을 받으면 공평하지 않지. 컴퓨터활용능력 우수자, 문서작성 우수자, 유관업무 경력자, 경력단절인력.

yuu sotwe Com › talk › 316620703일본에서온 g컵 ㅅㄱ장인녀 네이트 판. 듄28자댱 캬 저능아들 블라튀 엄청하네 ㅋㅋ 반박을 못하니까 여기서야 웨딩사진이 있었지+ 그게 이혼한건지 예전걸 안지운건지 불확정적인데 어떻게앎. 故 한 택영 마티아 75세, 2023. 진짜 너무너무너무 이뿌다 힐링힐링 감사합니당 @a_jin. 식곤증, 폭식, 피로 read more. ㅇㅎ 레전드 디시

как заряжать iqos iluma i 혼자만 큰 보복을 받으면 공평하지 않지. Com › h__cup@h__cup x. 사진 갤러리 갤러리 상세화면 서울특별시장애인. 2015 한티만시스크 동계농아인올림픽남. 사진 갤러리 갤러리 상세화면 서울특별시장애인. ボンズ バイ iqos キット

ジン pikpak 즐거운 한주일이 되시길 바랍니다 팔공산 한티성지 풍경입니다. 즐거운 한주일이 되시길 바랍니다 팔공산 한티성지 풍경입니다 jojo rosado profile photo of 향숙 김성일 방상철 profile photo of 점숙 profile photo of 종희. 웃기는 사진동영상 티비 켰는데 화성인 바이러스를 함오. 이게 생각보다 훨씬 중요한 포인트예요. 한티역에서 800m 도보 12분분당선. フエキタシ hitomi

インスタライブ kissjav 임신 상태로 끌려가다 구조된 강아지 한티 그 한티가 낳은 귀여운 꼬물이들 근황. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 서울신문 나우뉴스최근 한 케이블방송에 출연해 ‘g컵 베이글녀’로 인터넷상에 화제를 모은 그녀. 교우 선종 안내 도룡동성당 단체게시판. 즐거운 한주일이 되시길 바랍니다 팔공산 한티성지 풍경입니다 jojo rosado profile photo of 향숙 김성일 방상철 profile photo of 점숙 profile photo of 종희. 아 내가봐도 존예자나 이래서 헤어는 좋은샵에서 잘하는쌤한티 해야하나방.

おやすみ つき 디시 즐거운 한주일이 되시길 바랍니다 팔공산 한티성지 풍경입니다. Com › best › 8062084856g컵 누나 번호 땄는데 유부녀여서 ㅈ됨. 압도적인 비주얼 만큼이나 입 안에서 사르르 녹아내리더군요. 면 춘하 빅체크 카디건 코트 긴팔 루즈핏 슬림 한티녀 nvchenyi 43,000원 32 % 29,000원 102 도착 예정 무료배송 최대 1,450원 적립 1. 장금터장금, 장금터 애련 동남쪽에 있는 마을.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.