Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Photo by 美谷朱音（元美谷朱里） on j. 本記事ではvtuber事務所「ホロライブ」に所属するメンバーホロメンの引退一覧・契約解除一覧・卒業理由・その後転生先などについて分かりやすくまとめてご紹介しています。最近順・1期生順. 〔記者馮亦寧／綜合報導〕日本av界女優移籍改名例子不斷，現年26歲的美谷朱里先是改名為「美谷朱音」，今（5）又在社群上投出震撼彈，表示. Com › @aftermat › video2025recap tiktok.

박넴

박원순 비서 이경인 얼굴

Hours ago — 福本：高校時代、引退間際に監督から「お前は弱いし、このままじゃ行く大学ないぞ」と言われたんです（笑）。 「悔しかったら勉強でみんなを見返そうぜ」と言.. 「騎乘位天才」美谷朱音突拋引退宣言！預計明年7 月退出av.. Photo by 美谷朱音（元美谷朱里） on j..

배빵 Av

배우 리카

引退の理由については「30までは続けると決めていて、いろんなインタビューでも引退について聞かれた時は、『30歳まではやり切ります』って答えていた。 自分で決めていたことなので、ここできっぱり区切りをつけたい」とした。, 日本av女優美谷朱音（美谷朱里）曾受封「騎乘位天才」封號，擁有甜美臉蛋以及魔鬼身材的她，深受廣大老司機支持與喜愛，去年還曾來來參加台北國際成人展，在台灣也擁有不少死忠粉絲。 她5日晚間突然透過各大社群平台宣布引退消息，讓粉絲相當震驚。. 大家好，我是美谷朱音。 我决定将于一年后，也就是在2025年7月19日引退！ 在接下来的一年里，我会全力以赴，不留遗憾地走完这段旅程！ 请继续支持我，谢谢！ 。 不知道是不是日本新法的问题（有兴趣的可以去搜搜），目前该行业受到了极大的动荡。.

방귀녀 영상

2024年7月5日、av女優の 美谷朱音 さんが、 2025年7月19日 をもってav女優を引退することをx（旧twitter）で発表しました。 約1年後の引退をあらかじめ公表したかたちとなり、節目の年に向けてファンとともに走り抜けたいという思いが込められています。. View the profiles of professionals named 三谷朱里 on linkedin, さらばミスターセンタープール！ sg3冠、g1・11度vで長く兵庫支部の大看板として活躍してきた魚谷智之（49＝兵庫）が電撃引退することが分かっ. Original sound yourwifey. Com › realtimenews › 20250423000055美谷朱音引退倒數3個月！證實「最後一砲」拍完 羞喊：我很幸福 娛樂, View the profiles of people named 三谷朱里.

美谷朱音（日語：美谷朱音／みたにあかね，羅馬化：mitani akane，1997年5月25日—），舊藝名為美谷朱里，日本前av女優。 2024年7月5日，在社交平台宣佈將於一年後引退。. 『嘆きの亡霊は引退したい 〜最弱ハンターによる最強パーティ育成術〜』（なげきのぼうれいはいんたいしたい さいじゃくハンターによるさいきょうパーティいくせいじゅつ）は、槻影による 日本 の ライトノベル。, コートの内外から高い決定力でスコアを重ねた琉球敵地で千葉jを相手に31点差快勝（バスケットボールキング） 1月24日、lala arena tokyobay. Com › @aftermat › video2025recap tiktok.

반디 히토미 Hours ago — 福本：高校時代、引退間際に監督から「お前は弱いし、このままじゃ行く大学ないぞ」と言われたんです（笑）。 「悔しかったら勉強でみんなを見返そうぜ」と言. 小阪昇 八段へ 引退棋士昇段規定により 大島映二 八段へ 引退棋士昇段規定により 清水市代 女流七段へ 類まれなる成績 里見香奈 女流六段へ 類まれなる成績 水町みゆ 女流初段へ 年度指し分け以上 8勝以上. 小阪昇 八段へ 引退棋士昇段規定により 大島映二 八段へ 引退棋士昇段規定により 清水市代 女流七段へ 類まれなる成績 里見香奈 女流六段へ 類まれなる成績 水町みゆ 女流初段へ 年度指し分け以上 8勝以上. コートの内外から高い決定力でスコアを重ねた琉球敵地で千葉jを相手に31点差快勝（バスケットボールキング） 1月24日、lala arena tokyobay. There are 2 professionals named 三谷朱里, who use linkedin to exchange information, ideas, and. 밤토털

박라희 터미널 「騎乘位天才」美谷朱音突拋引退宣言！預計明年7 月退出av. View the profiles of professionals named 三谷朱里 on linkedin. Jp › blog › mitaniakaneretirement美谷朱音さん、2025年7月19日にav女優を引退へ。「悔いの残らない1年. 〔記者馮亦寧／綜合報導〕日本av界女優移籍改名例子不斷，現年26歲的美谷朱里先是改名為「美谷朱音」，今（5）又在社群上投出震撼彈，表示. Net › news › 2771708老司機哭了！av女神美谷朱音「無預警宣布引退」：不留任何遺憾 etto. 밤가드 디시

바이퍼 야동 以下では引退・卒業した 「ホロライブ」vtuber を数人ピックアップしてご紹介します。 調べてわかった引退理由を解説してますので、参考にしてください。 鏡見キラ 引用： 鏡見キラ 公式twitter 月下カオルさんは「アイドル目指して元気いっぱいの男の娘。. コートの内外から高い決定力でスコアを重ねた琉球敵地で千葉jを相手に31点差快勝（バスケットボールキング） 1月24日、lala arena tokyobay. 27歲日本av女優美谷朱音出道6年，擁有166 公分、e罩杯身材，曾受封「騎乘位天才」，去年曾來台參加台北國際成人展，擁有大票粉絲。豈料，昨（5. 美谷朱音（元美谷朱里） @akanemitani0415. Net › news › 2771708老司機哭了！av女神美谷朱音「無預警宣布引退」：不留任何遺憾 etto. 백사키 미이로

백지영 야동 영상 『嘆きの亡霊は引退したい 〜最弱ハンターによる最強パーティ育成術〜』（なげきのぼうれいはいんたいしたい さいじゃくハンターによるさいきょうパーティいくせいじゅつ）は、槻影による 日本 の ライトノベル。. Com › realtimenews › 20250423000055美谷朱音引退倒數3個月！證實「最後一砲」拍完 羞喊：我很幸福 娛樂. 昨日7月19日は涙あり笑いありの引退イベントでした！ 来てくれて暖かく見送ってくれた. 朱里） （japanese porn actress akane mitani） ※2025年7月19日にav女優を引退！ 美谷朱音 美谷朱里 セクシー 女優 セクシー女優 かわいい. Original sound yourwifey.

박지현 포르노 美谷朱里出事了，首先是账号在11月初后就没有发文，而且三个主要使用的社群账号都烂了，自我介绍栏全都删光光了，小号甚至把名字改成了句号。 她确实承受了不. 168 likes, 3 comments makoto__kamijo on j extension new ‍♂️ @akarimitani0415 三谷朱里. ＜ライバー・ファルガー・オーヴィドについての情報＞ 引退理由 引退理由は 「会社との方向性の違い」 などです。 2024年の終わりに、引退を決意したとのことです。 彼には元々精神的な不調があり、活動休止したこともありました。. Com › realtimenews › 20240706001494謎片女優美谷朱音不幹了！突宣布引退「不留遺憾」老司機哭了. 「五木ひろし」55周年記念ツアー開幕 昨夏体調崩すも完全禁煙.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.